Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rich@1967z28.com: 80 ]

Total 80 documents matching your query.

21. [TenTec] Updating Radios... (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 19:06:11 -0500
John, I agree with your point about TenTec charging a yearly fee for the updates. As much as they think they are doing the ham community a favor by offering it for free, I for one would rather the fu
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00020.html (11,172 bytes)

22. [TenTec] Re: Jupiter firmware problems...NOT! (SO!... ) (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 12:01:55 -0500
Reminds me of the old saying.... Best price, High quality, Great service.. Pick two ! Count me in for charging for annual updates. Still cheaper than the postage to send a radio back. 73, kd0zv -- Or
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00035.html (12,897 bytes)

23. [TenTec] Pegasus annoyance (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 21:51:27 -0500
Something that bugs me about the Pegasus is that mine makes a very = slight "tick" (in the speaker) sound every 2.5khz when tuning. I am not = sure but is seems more noticable with the remote POD. An
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00053.html (7,358 bytes)

24. [TenTec] Pegasus annoyance (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 08:59:36 -0500
Thanks Carl, Where did you learn so much about this stuff :) It is not too bad, but I find it annoying. I can hear it even if the band is not quiet. Sounds like a small electric discharge each 2.5khz
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00060.html (9,376 bytes)

25. [TenTec] Re: Jupiter firmware problems...NOT! (SO!... ) (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 12:29:28 -0500
" I do not like the idea of paying for software updates which are now free, without something in exchange" That is kinda like saying I do not like paying for automobiles when walking is currently fre
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00069.html (12,035 bytes)

26. [TenTec] Pegasus annoyance (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:50:08 -0500
Dont be so serious Carl :) We all know why you could answer that question ! Rich band
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00074.html (11,823 bytes)

27. [TenTec] Re: Jupiter firmware problems...NOT! (SO!... ) (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 13:59:28 -0500
Bob, I am not sure if it is a good analogy or not, but all I am saying is I think we could expect more if we were paying for it. All I feel I am entitled to is what I got when I opened the box. Any i
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00075.html (15,390 bytes)

28. [TenTec] Re: Jupiter firmware problems...NOT! (SO!... ) (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 16:06:13 -0500
I think the whole "lets pay more" is taken out of context. Lets look at the much bigger picture. First of all, let me turn my statement around and say. " I want more and I am willing to pay for it" A
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00081.html (20,192 bytes)

29. [TenTec] Re: Jupiter firmware problems...NOT! (SO!... ) (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2002 18:31:54 -0500
"Who in the world would cheer on paying out more taxes or paying out of pocket for what is already cheerfully provided" Mike, you are assuming what they cheerfully provide" is even close to what it c
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00085.html (10,667 bytes)

30. [TenTec] Pegasus Plus observations (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 19:42:25 -0500
It looks like the next BETA of the 32 bit Pegasus Plus software is about = ready to hit the web. I have been lucky enough to play with it and could = not resist posting a screen shot. You can see the
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00125.html (9,010 bytes)

31. [TenTec] Pegasus Plus observations (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2002 22:08:03 -0500
This is true. Since I already have the Remote POD I am torn between the new "super mouse" and it. The new mouse has all the same fucntions as the remote POD. With the new mouse you can actually acces
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00128.html (11,361 bytes)

32. [TenTec] Pegasus Plus observations (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 11:54:10 -0500
I have heard that some of the USB port adapters are flakey and I ended up using an 8 port PCI card. But, for those who have tried the Pegasus Plus software before, I know that the communications end
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00137.html (11,803 bytes)

33. [TenTec] WA1EYP (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 08:56:26 -0500
Looks like Mike WA1EYP posted the latest BETA of his software last = night. There is a version for the 320 and Pegasus/Jupiter. Here is the link http://home.tiac.net/~nhcobu/ 73, Rich kd0zv -- StripM
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00201.html (6,332 bytes)

34. [TenTec] Paying for updates... pshaw! (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 15:41:41 -0500
Hey Rick, Curious what you do not like about the Pegausus Plus? The N4PY software has been very well optimized and Carl is the king when it comes to adding little one step features that really help.
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00213.html (8,795 bytes)

35. [TenTec] Pegasus Plus. . . .goodbye (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 19:05:28 -0500
Hey Rick, that is a bummer. I remember having those problems with the first beta I tried but all is better now with the 2.9 after getting all my settings right. I am convinced that the software is no
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00260.html (9,509 bytes)

36. [TenTec] Information leak Peg/Jupiter/320 (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 23:55:54 -0500
I have been lucky enough over the last few weeks to get some "pre" beta = versions of the Pegasus Plus software for the Ten Tec software radios = from WA1EYP Tonight I got to look at the latest optio
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00290.html (6,968 bytes)

37. [TenTec] re: Pegasus Plus. . . .goodbye (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 19:15:28 -0500
Jeff, Feel free to drop me a note off the forum. I am pretty familiar with POD tuning and have 4 PC's from 300mhz to 1.8ghz running the POD as smooth as the standard (N4PY) :) Setting up the POD is w
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00335.html (8,259 bytes)

38. [TenTec] re: Pegasus Plus. . . .goodbye (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Sun, 15 Sep 2002 20:37:17 -0500
Jeff, I responded to your email and it was bounced. Can you verify it is correct? I think your reply to is wrong??? This is what is says kb2m@dandy.net Looks like the wq is missing. Rich -- Original
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00337.html (8,069 bytes)

39. [TenTec] Can't Remember... (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 09:10:13 -0500
Opposite mike :) suppose to go and it's a humming
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00477.html (7,545 bytes)

40. [TenTec] Optical Encoder operation (score: 1)
Author: rich@1967z28.com (Rich McCabe)
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 15:54:03 -0500
In my experience two actual encoders are used and are 90 degrees out of phase. Because of that and the position it can sense movement. 73, Rich kd0zv -- Original Message -- From: "Mark Erbaugh" <mark
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00240.html (8,512 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu