Mail Archive Search: <+from:rhulett1@consolidated.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:rhulett1@consolidated.net: 103 ]

Total 103 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] R4020 (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 21:40:24 -0500 (EST); This rig comes assembled for about the cost of an ATS-4, Weber dual bander, or KX-1 kit. Still, I'd personally rather buy a US product, and enjoy building kits anyway. _______________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00442.html (7,771 bytes)
42. Re: [TenTec] WAS: Omni 6 Logic board failure (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 23:11:49 -0500 (EST); "Am I willing to pay for a throw away plastic rig in order to get all kinds of cool extras to play with..." Since I own an Omni VII, my answer is evidently "yes", though didn't buy it to get cool ext; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00460.html (9,587 bytes)
43. [TenTec] Omni VII ATU Saga (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:12:32 -0600; My Omni VII arrived in good condition after a trip to the factory to repair a broken internal ATU. It seems to be working fine, the tuner works as well as it did when new. What puzzles me is Ten-Tec'; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00538.html (7,925 bytes)
44. Re: [TenTec] Omni VII ATU Saga (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:38:47 -0500 (EST); On 1/24/2011 10:07 PM, Curt wrote: Recently received repaired 588AT S/N 10C10977, repair #R-8329. Everything works fine now, but would appreciate some explanation of how repacing a defective 455 filt; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00543.html (7,767 bytes)
45. [TenTec] Omni C Questions ( Maybe OT ) (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:16:03 -0600; Having bought an Omni C from a ham in NY who claimed it had no operating issues, found my trust in fellow hams is sometimes misplaced. I have a few questions about the issues identified (so far): Pow; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00421.html (8,687 bytes)
46. Re: [TenTec] Omni C Questions ( Maybe OT ) (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 09:47:13 -0600; Thanks for the info. Yes, the power switch is no big deal, can you elaborate further on the "switch pins" would this be on the 80711 Osc-Mixer board? Did you remove it to do the soldering? How? Furth; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00424.html (11,854 bytes)
47. Re: [TenTec] Omni C Questions ( Maybe OT ) (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 14:45:00 -0500 (EST); The band switching problems and the lack of some bands may be due to the crystal assembly. Opening up the rig, some of the crystals are very loose in their sockets. Called Ten-Tec about another socke; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00437.html (9,278 bytes)
48. [TenTec] My Omni C Saga. (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:48:07 -0600; "Mint" Omni C recently purchased is better now. The excessive current draw ( with no output ) turned out to be PA bias set for maximum instead 1.5-2 amps current. The seller claimed it worked FB I'm; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00588.html (7,276 bytes)
49. [TenTec] Omni C transmit off frequency (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 21:21:45 -0400 (EDT); Am back to working with "mint" Omni C I foolishly bought. After tuning onto a sideband frequency, my transmitted signal is off frequency for the other op, as if RIT were on though it is not. Any idea; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00223.html (6,749 bytes)
50. Re: [TenTec] Fw: Omni C transmit off frequency (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 12:07:28 -0500; Yes, thanks Mike. I had found R-16 after your first message, of course I violated rule #1, RTFM. Never imagined an adjustment for that, figured a component failure. Adjusted per the manual, also adju; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00234.html (10,041 bytes)
51. [TenTec] Omni C crystal holder source (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 08:22:29 -0400 (EDT); The Omni C is working ok after adjustments. I even managed to get 30 and 10M working by wedging wire into the loose crystal sockets. I asked Ten-Tec whether they still stocked the crystal holders for; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00251.html (8,114 bytes)
52. [TenTec] FS:Omni VII 588AT $1800 (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 13:11:28 -0500; Downsizing the shack, selling my Omni VII with built-in antenna tuner. I am the original owner, and ours is a non-smoking household. NO optional filters, 708A desk microphone, original box, cables, a; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00073.html (6,828 bytes)
53. [TenTec] Last Ten-Tec to NOT use Microprocessor? (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:32:07 -0400 (EDT); The discussion about Corsair II replacement logic board prompts a question. What was the last model that didn't use a microprocessor for control? The Corsair or the Omni C or ? 73, Curt KB5JO _______; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00082.html (7,714 bytes)
54. Re: [TenTec] Other TT digital displays ? (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:43:11 -0400 (EDT); Somehow I had the evidently wrong impression that the earlier displays like for the Omni C used TTL chips still readily available. Upon review of the schematic for my 544, the MK50398N chip is mentio; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00089.html (8,499 bytes)
55. Re: [TenTec] Anyone compared a Ten Tec Eagle to the Icom 7000? (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:23:57 -0500; The TS-590S specs might compare favorably with the TT-599, but personally having all eggs in the Ten-Tec basket doesn't seem a bad thing. A friend's TS-50 quit recently, and mfg service told him they; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-09/msg00305.html (10,674 bytes)
56. [TenTec] WTB:Ten Tec-405 amp (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2011 07:52:13 -0500; Looking for a 405 amplifier. 73, Curt KB5JO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00071.html (6,477 bytes)
57. [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418? (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 06:07:52 -0500; While surfing web for a QRP/100W PA, encountered reference to a new Ten-Tec 418 amplifier. Evidently it is intended as potential companion for another new Ten-Tec 539 QRP transceiver. I've been curio; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00079.html (6,810 bytes)
58. Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418? (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 12:59:10 -0500; I'm wondering whether Ten-Tec accepts preorders or reservations? According to the info I read which was Ten-Tec answers to questions, the new amp can evidently accomodate any QRP rig. If that is true; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00088.html (8,190 bytes)
59. Re: [TenTec] When and where Ten Tec 418? (score: 1): Author: "Curt" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 13:13:08 -0500; Complaining about a product that isn't for sale yet??!!! Amazing. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinf; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00090.html (8,402 bytes)
60. [TenTec] Omni D PTO Swap (score: 1): Author: "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:20:09 -0500 (EST); If I remove the entire PTO assembly from one Omni D and install in another, are there any adjustments needed other than the L1, L2, & L3 adjustments on the PTO to set the oscillator endpoints and lin; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00214.html (7,017 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]