Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:resluder@yahoo.com: 74 ]

Total 74 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Eagle with LP-PAN (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 20:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
The Softrock Lite II can be ordered with a crystal specific to your IF.  Makes an even cheaper PAN adapter when added to your sound card.  The receiver is $21.00 plus the cost of the xtal which runs
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00139.html (9,490 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 17:52:46 -0400
And the audiophiles discovered the 813 and how well they worked in their HB audio amps and woosh... the prices skyrocketed. Eric W9WLW -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my b
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00191.html (22,174 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 12:15:33 -0400
I like the NR in the Omni VII much better than the one in the Eagle. The audio characteristics in the Eagle change dramatically in SSB and AM modes. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Plea
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00263.html (11,778 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II noise blanker (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2014 19:21:58 -0400
I was responding to James comments on personal preference for NR & NB. Eric W9WLW -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00270.html (13,629 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 07:53:32 -0800 (PST)
I say we (Ham's in general) will keep up this need for accuracy to the point of lodging complaints to the ARRL and then the FCC, and we will eventually be channelized like most other HF services.  Ev
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00285.html (15,559 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:03:56 -0800 (PST)
John: That is a great summation of Rick's words!  Eric W9WLW
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00286.html (15,436 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 09:13:12 -0800 (PST)
I was talking to a fellow Ham on 80/75 meters the other night and I noticed his audio just didn't seem right.  He was running a TS-950s, and a Henry amp and talking into a D104.  I turned my Softrock
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00287.html (11,385 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with Ten Tec rigs (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 10:41:05 -0800 (PST)
I'm told that I sound acceptable for a non-boatachor using the Omni VII.   I believe the audio is adjustable on the O7 using the AM mode, but I haven't tried real hard to improve my audio any.  Since
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00339.html (13,077 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with TenTecrigs (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2014 18:00:36 -0800 (PST)
If this of any help, this is from the Ten-Tec website and found in the knowledge base: Tuning instructions for AM Operation with the Onmi VII   Return to knowledge base 1. Set the power output to the
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00355.html (19,683 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with TenTec rigs (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 18:13:15 -0500
Bry, Your reference to the ergonomics of the Omni VII front panel - what is your concern? Just a curiosity question on my part. It did take me a few hours to get use to it, but I see where even on th
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00383.html (11,722 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with Ten Tecrigs (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 03:39:14 -0800 (PST)
I agree... Bob is an Elmer of Elmer's. Having taken an eight year hiatus from HF and struggled remembering a few things. Bob is patient and gracious in every personal email I've sent him, and trust m
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00395.html (10,449 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with TenTec rigs (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder-W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 07:32:51 -0800 (PST)
Bry: You won't find a simpler rig to use that rates high on Rob's list for receiver performance, and that is the Eagle.  It's so simple, that when I got mine I actually went through "Knob Withdrawal"
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00405.html (18,000 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with TenTec rigs (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:39:28 -0500
Excellent analogies. Eric W9WLW -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00409.html (18,817 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology AM transmit with Ten Tecrigs (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 07:59:11 -0500
Oh yes, I agree. Rick, recently help me think thru different matchbox configurations, plus we're Windom brethren ;-) (hi). Jim's excellente' tutorials, and my gratitude could go on and on.... basic.<
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00444.html (11,284 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] On Switching Power Supplies (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:42:41 -0500
That is an observation Bob and something I will have to look for on my power supplies at home. 73-Eric W9WLW -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00125.html (12,186 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] What's going to be next? (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:33:29 -0500
A slightly larger Eagle II with the added functions you would find in the Omni VII, in a price range of $2500-2700 would be a show stopper. That means it would need room for a 2nd RX-366 that is opti
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-01/msg00182.html (14,127 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] which power supplystation efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "resluder@yahoo.com" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 13:18:40 -0500
I use Ten-Tecs switcher supplies, but they are usually an OEM device with their name on them. Astron and Chinese manufacturers. None that I own have the ability to move the noise a we bit. However, t
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00059.html (8,788 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] which power supplystation efficiency (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 19:21:33 -0500
During my last jaunt on HF (before selling station to focus on my kids), I ran my Paragon this way, but with a homemade charger I came up with at the time. I wish I hadn't gotten rid of the charger.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00061.html (15,698 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] 318 and qsk-5 (score: 1)
Author: "R. Eric Sluder - W9WLW" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 09:43:18 -0500
I don't have an old amp design that I have brought to live, but I did recently drag home an 80's vintage Motorola paging transmitter with a nice two tube (8560AS') amp to possibly convert to a six me
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-12/msg00077.html (14,357 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] 160 M antenna (score: 1)
Author: "resluder@yahoo.com" <resluder@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2013 20:59:08 -0500
The discussion has included the use of a "Ten-Tec" model 238 tuner so it seems quite appropriate. The inclusion of the antenna and chokes/baluns is both beneficial and value add. Oh, and Ten-Tec sell
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-11/msg00035.html (10,230 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu