Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:rdetweil@hotmail.com: 227 ]

Total 227 documents matching your query.

181. RE: [TenTec] IC7800 (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 13:43:28 -0500
Ahhh ... it reminds me of the old days around here discussing and cussing the Orion :-) Um, if I may inject a note of impartiality here, I think your memory is faulty. Go look at the IC7800 yahoo gro
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00428.html (10,011 bytes)

182. RE: [TenTec] IC7800 (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:33:28 -0500
Yes, like every Orion owner will dump it for a couple of extra dB and plunk down another $7-8000. Not likely. Well, maybe and then again maybe not, Agree to dis-agree, The reason for going to the Ori
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00439.html (10,016 bytes)

183. RE: [TenTec] IC-7800 (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:44:55 -0500
Joe said it well, I will agree especially the part about putting the money into the antenna, It's the most rewarding. 73's Rich K5SF Some of the discussions on the new Icom here remind me of the old
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00443.html (10,454 bytes)

184. Re: [TenTec] Additional Thoughts on New Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 23:07:06 -0500
Hi Bernard, I'm Richard, K5SF, I'd llike to try and answer for you some of this, I'm sure if it's not correct, others will chime in. First of all, the 2.4 filter does auto engage at around 2000 BW. B
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00511.html (13,012 bytes)

185. [TenTec] Transverters (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:29:57 -0500
Any one have any comparisons between the Elecraft Transverters and the Ten Tec Transverters? I know about the power differences, but i'm more interested in receiver performance of the transverters. 7
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00524.html (7,435 bytes)

186. RE: [TenTec] N4PY Pegasus/Jupiter/Argonaut V/rx320/rx340/rx350 controlprogram Version 2.15 (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:45:37 -0500
Hi Carl In running the program for the trial period, I've noticed that many of the Orion lock up problems are revealed by the program being online, Is this something you are seeing also? I'm wonderin
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00561.html (8,808 bytes)

187. Re: [TenTec] Bush behind BPL... (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 10:54:01 -0500
Here is my text, to the Texas PUC commission 73's de K5SF == Is the BPL infrastructure costs going to be passed on to the consumer in higher electric rates due to any guaranteed profits allowed to th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00595.html (12,576 bytes)

188. Re: [TenTec] Bush behind BPL... (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 11:15:49 -0500
Here is my e-mail to the Dallas morning news political columnist, Notice how I've left Ham radio out all together, Thus if we get the joe public concerned about the increase in power costs, I'm sure
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00596.html (9,633 bytes)

189. RE: [TenTec] BPL & Bush (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 19:17:39 -0500
Hi Dave, Thanks for your reply, I agree that for now it is pretty much a done deal. One point I want to say is that trying to focus on the 'technical' issues is the wrong place in this environment. T
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00609.html (10,148 bytes)

190. RE: [TenTec] BPL & Bush (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 22:16:01 -0500
Hi Bill, Thanks for your reply, The rule changes is one issue that can cause a long term problem, Yet the increase cost in electricity to 'fund' the BPL is another, We are all banking on the hope tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00623.html (13,595 bytes)

191. [TenTec] Orion & SSB QRM question (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:28:54 -0600
Question on the use of the DSP and Filters for SSB QRM reduction. Gave the Orion an good workout on SSB over the weekend. Had a very difficult time on the 160M SSB Contest with QRM. (a tough band for
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00014.html (8,786 bytes)

192. [TenTec] Orion & SSB QRM question (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:20:58 -0600
for parameters. An excellent idea. Even in a very limited form of just assigning the AGC threshold to, say, SEND 1, it will still be very useful. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VA3TTN ____________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00016.html (8,720 bytes)

193. [TenTec] Sweep Questions (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 08:51:22 -0600
Hi Fellow Orion users, I am wondering if anyone else is having sweep lock up problems under V1.369 of the micro code. The rig only quits RX & TX when the Sweep locks up, Next to the Send 2 button is
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00179.html (8,002 bytes)

194. RE: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 13:28:37 -0600
Advertisers apparently didn't want to pay up for the bandwidth increases... This is a common difficulty with the hobby web sites... old addage, pick any of the following two, Good Fast Cheap Works ev
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00315.html (9,569 bytes)

195. RE: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 14:25:29 -0600
Got a message back that the advertiseres weren't approached for increases in advertising, pehaps we should ask eham to do so. 73's Rich K5SF increases... _____________________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00320.html (10,904 bytes)

196. RE: [TenTec] eHam! (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 15:41:26 -0600
Well, For me, E-mails to eham's people have been responded to, Changed my call sign and they handled it just fine. They even transferred the flag that said I was a subscriber... But there may be some
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00330.html (10,000 bytes)

197. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:38:44 -0600
Hope this is taken in the positive spirit it is intended. I've sent in a couple of e-mails about faults to dtsnbits, but have felt a bit un-rewarded for my efforts. Dits&Bits doesn't respond with an
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00546.html (10,716 bytes)

198. Re: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 10:58:02 -0600
What would it take for an e-mail auto-responder? Re the Mars Rover, put another few million dollars and a few hundred tecnicians on the job and you might get the same results! Frank, K4VMO -- Origina
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00548.html (12,487 bytes)

199. RE: [TenTec] ditsnbits? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 12:25:55 -0600
That would not make good business sense, Customers should never be told to go somewhere else. I would hate to think there is only one person who works at rf-sqared on the radio's microcode, That woul
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00554.html (9,442 bytes)

200. [TenTec] RE: [Orion] Raspy Receive CW Note Problem Solved (score: 1)
Author: "Richard Detweiler" <rdetweil@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 08:58:24 -0600
Joe, Glad you got your Orion, I think you'll come to really love it. It's the best thing going today for RX performance. The problem you found seems to be a common problem many of us are seeing. When
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00585.html (9,702 bytes)

Current List: 181 - 200
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12]
This search system is powered by Namazu