Mail Archive Search: <+from:patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk>

Results:

References: [ +from:patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk: 112 ]

Total 112 documents matching your query.

101. [TenTec] Repeatability of Tuner Settings (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 22:53:54 -0000 (GMT); In my experience it is not wise to keep anything vulnerable to the elements in a garage ... unless you have air con. I prefer to keep my TT 253 ATU indoors where I can get at it and it is warm and dr; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00464.html (12,243 bytes)
102. [TenTec] question, please help (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:38:54 -0000 (GMT); Hi Scott; you have it right. When I got my Omni-V (new, in the US) there was a three page SUPPLEMENTARY DATA handout in the back of the manual. Page 2 describes the "split" function in a little more; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00502.html (11,982 bytes)
103. [TenTec] Omni V ssb reception (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:38:58 -0000 (GMT); Does the noise blanker work ?? I never found it useful, but it does cause distortion if you crank it up. Never had an audio quality complaint, but according to local stations, there is a difference i; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00503.html (11,669 bytes)
104. [TenTec] questions (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:38:50 -0000 (GMT); I agree that filtering at IF is more effective than at audio, but it costs more. It is better to get rid of the crud as early as possible before it hits the AVC system for six. I personally recommend; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00504.html (9,512 bytes)
105. [TenTec] OMNI V J310's (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1999 04:23:54 -0000 (GMT); Many thanks Walt. If I get stuck I'll ask them to mail me some. Looks like they have some other interesting items. Over here we can mostly get the same stuff, but sometimes I find that specific compo; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00513.html (8,647 bytes)
106. [TenTec] any way to RIT a V (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 04:59:16 -0000 (GMT); RIT the easy way, via Omni-V 301 remote tuning head. I got the 301 unit during a visit to TT at Sevierville. (Well, its a long trip from UK if you don't actually buy something !) It attaches via a Y-; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00550.html (9,540 bytes)
107. [TenTec] Front end active devices J310 (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 11:19:46 -0000 (GMT); Thanks for all the varied advice on this topic. Summarising earlier comment, it appears that making a properly matched set of J-310s requires testing several under the same conditions, for example wi; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00561.html (11,726 bytes)
108. [TenTec] Computer control for Omni V? (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 04:37:17 -0000 (GMT); The short answer is that it doesn't work reliably with any program I tried. The longer answer is that it will work up to a point with HYPERLOG, but the Omni-V interface is not the same as more recent; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00571.html (9,374 bytes)
109. [TenTec] OMNI 6 PLUS, 250 hz Filter Problems (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 00:08:41 -0000 (GMT); But did you try the passband tuning ?? I find that if I use a narrow filter up front, then its necessary to shift the second filter passband into correct alignment with the first. Having a 250 up fro; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00592.html (9,744 bytes)
110. [TenTec] OMNI 6 PLUS, 250 hz Filter Problems (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Fri, 29 Jan 1999 07:20:59 -0000 (GMT); OK you win, Roy ! My apologies for the goof - I misread the msg as being Omni-V related. But the principle is OK; it seems to be a matter of finding out how to get the second filter aligned with the; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00599.html (13,069 bytes)
111. [TenTec] Omni V RF gain (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 04:39:17 -0000 (GMT); This does not apply to my Omni-V .... and I'm interested to know if mine is an oddball in this respect. I very rarely reduce the RF gain below 2 PM. Normally it sits at 3PM plus or minus. On 17m and; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00623.html (9,661 bytes)
112. [TenTec] Omni V RF gain (score: 1): Author: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk (patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk); Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 11:26:27 -0000 (GMT); Glad to know someone still has a job Steve .... Most of ours are being exported to Asia John G3JAG -- E-Mail: patents@dx0man.prestel.co.uk To: <tentec@contesting.com> Date: 31-Jan-99 Time: 11:19:49; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-01/msg00630.html (8,519 bytes)

Current List: 101 - 112
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]