Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nq5t@tx.rr.com: 159 ]

Total 159 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Firmware update...how soon? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2007 23:12:03 -0500
Absolutely!! It's time to finish it. And getting more than irritating that it's been on hold for so many months. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00104.html (8,656 bytes)

82. Re: [TenTec] FYI - New Omin VII firmware released (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:08:06 -0500
It's good to see activity, but .. Too bad some of it isn't directed at the Orion II/v2 :( Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00246.html (6,999 bytes)

83. Re: [TenTec] FYI - New Omin VII firmware released (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 19:12:37 -0500
That's sort of subsumed into the v2 series of releases (2.059d, etc.) for the original Orion with or without the v2 mod. I don't think we're ever going to see another official 1.xxx release. Grant/N
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00250.html (7,733 bytes)

84. [TenTec] FLEX, Omni-VII, Hilberling (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 14:55:37 -0500
Flipping through the new QST, there is certainly a lot of new stuff to consider. We live in interesting times :) I did note that all of the "open source" balderdash about the Flex radios has passed i
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00298.html (7,095 bytes)

85. Re: [TenTec] FLEX, Omni-VII, Hilberling (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 15:20:19 -0500
Hi, Mark .. Yes, I try to keep tabs on what's going on at HPSDR. It is an interesting project, and will be even more interesting to see what happens with a complete and usable package. It also seems
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00302.html (8,507 bytes)

86. Re: [TenTec] FLEX, Omni-VII, Hilberling (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 20:04:21 -0500
YES, Yes, you're the third person (but the only one who made a public post) that has corrected my misunderstanding of the mysteries of "open source" in the SDR-1000 and Flex-5000 and the "true meanin
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00309.html (10,679 bytes)

87. Re: [TenTec] O II Filters (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:43:41 -0500
The process is so simple, there's no reason not to try it. It will affect the falloff rate on either side of center, although you're entirely correct that it may end up not being necessary for any g
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00420.html (8,707 bytes)

88. Re: [TenTec] 2.038k (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 20:56:02 -0500
Does the SSB transmit bandwidth setting affect AM transmit response? I guess the real question is whether or not they have reverted to the original v1 method of allowing control of AM transmit bandw
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00437.html (7,193 bytes)

89. Re: [TenTec] Updated Orion II "Wish List" (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:07:40 -0500
I saw your comments on AM being "fixed". The really unfortunate part about this is that on the v1 Orion, AM just worked -- beautifully, with somewhat broader TX bandwidth, and the ability to reduce t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00506.html (8,487 bytes)

90. Re: [TenTec] Updated Orion II "Wish List" (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 14:29:06 -0500
.. And most of us wish we could type :) Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00508.html (7,065 bytes)

91. Re: [TenTec] Updated Orion II "Wish List" (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 15:21:43 -0500
Thanks, Ron ... Between bad weather overhead when the update came out and having to work for a living, I haven't had the time to even load the new firmware yet. But I'm looking forward to it :) Grant
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00510.html (8,478 bytes)

92. Re: [TenTec] V2.060b Release Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:05:18 -0500
There may be an issue with the DigiKeyer inteface, but a standard USB-serial interface does work just fine. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00528.html (8,548 bytes)

93. Re: [TenTec] Flash update not working (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 11:15:57 -0500
I just had a similar thing happen. I updated my Orion II and it worked fine. When I tried to update the Orion I v2, I consistently got a communications failure message. The update program screen did
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00542.html (8,668 bytes)

94. [TenTec] 2.038k (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 19:18:41 -0500
Finally had a chance to listen a little this afternoon. So far, I think this is a real improvement in many areas. Still have to try out the Orion I. NR seems better on SSB with less distortion, the f
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00561.html (7,818 bytes)

95. Re: [TenTec] ORION II ver. 2.038k RIT? XIT? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 14:07:13 -0500
Appears to working fine here. I checked both receivers on both slow and fast encoder rate settings. Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.co
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00578.html (8,827 bytes)

96. Re: [TenTec] Revisit: Re: ORION II ver. 2.038k RIT? XIT? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 15:51:56 -0500
It really sounds like all of the fiddling with the control (at least temporarily) fixed the mechanical or contact issue with the control itself. There's no reason why turning it off and on several t
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-04/msg00610.html (7,391 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 11:50:13 -0500
You have to believe the Orion3 (or whatever) is on the drawing board, if not already in the prototype stage. There is probably a whole new round of "radio wars" getting ready to start up again. K3,
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00016.html (8,296 bytes)

98. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:15:09 -0500
Egg is standard. I've got so much on mine, it's hardened into a crust :-) Grant/NQ5T _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00025.html (8,844 bytes)

99. Re: [TenTec] Elecraft K3 vs Orion? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 1 May 2007 14:53:07 -0500
As for being the Orion killer, I think waiting for some test reports and real world experience might be a reasonable thing to do. Which does not imply that I think the K3 won't be a mighty good radi
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00026.html (9,899 bytes)

100. Re: [TenTec] Orion V2.060b Comments (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 2 May 2007 10:44:25 -0500
I spent some time yesterday evening running 2.060b and 2.038k side-by-side. There is definitely something wrong with the gain picture in 2.060b, or if "wrong" isn't the correct term, then certainly
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-05/msg00048.html (8,750 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu