Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nq5t@attbi.com: 94 ]

Total 94 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] TCXO Alignment (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 23:44:13 +0000
As Jerry pointed out correctly, a while back, a TCXO is a Temperature COMPENSATED Crystal Oscillator, not an oven. Have no idea whether the TCXO remains powered when the radio is off, but it's going
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00497.html (8,930 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 15:35:30 +0000
The spec is +/- 1 ppm at "room temperature" and +/- 3ppm "over temperature", which I presume means over the defined operating range of 0-50 degC. As far as "excursion" is concerned, the range would b
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00564.html (9,946 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 04:29:23 +0000
I'll take a good receiver any day. Compare the rest of the specs.
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00593.html (9,385 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 05:32:18 +0000
Sounds like a rigourous comparison .. Digging signals out of mud (wchich I take to mean attempting to get intelligence from a signal that is at .. and maybe a good bit of the time below .. the ambien
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00599.html (8,737 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Orion TCXO Warm Up Drift (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 06:16:18 +0000
It isn't mojo, it's physics. Side by side works fine, if there's a valid receiver characteristic that makes a difference. I'ts a brand-independent issue. Unless the issue is internal receiver noise a
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00603.html (9,722 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Buyer beware? (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2003 02:53:54 +0000
Yes. But only test that has any real validity is the A/B test he's just completed. Since he didn't do an A/B test of radio X with every radio on the list, there's no basis for a ranking. Seems to be
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00859.html (7,600 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Hello Orion Users (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 20:52:12 -0500
The relationship only exists because of the physical nature of how those two sensors on the sides of our head work. The distinction between audio and not-audio is irrelevant in this situation. As som
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00110.html (9,671 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Orion headphone jack (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 16:19:27 -0500
I have plugged a set of mono phones into that jack on a couple of occasions accidentally. The world did not come to an end. The radio did not blow up or smoke. In response to a previous post on this
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00202.html (8,245 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Orion Question (CW Tuneup) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@attbi.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 18:03:08 -0500
You may simply want to read the manual section on the TUNE button. Press TUNE and you will get carrier, reduced to about 20% of full output. If you then (or first) press PWR, TUNE will give you the c
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00321.html (10,430 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Orion Question (CW Tuneup) (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@attbi.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2003 05:21:57 -0500
I had the discoussion with Ten-Tec right after my Orion arrived a the end of March. The current manual version is incorrect and incomplete on the operation of TUNE, and on the interaction between TUN
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00329.html (10,599 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] Famous Ten Tec QSK & Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@attbi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 17:47:06 -0500
The Orion hears between dots and dashes on the MAIN receiver at all speeds ( a little iffi above the mid-50's) ... at some point, it gets to be a bit academic anyway -- at least for me :-) The sub re
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00495.html (8,587 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Dayton Feedback?? (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@attbi.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 22:13:11 -0500
Saw the pic. Truly one of the ugliest radios the Pacific has yet produced ... Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00517.html (10,650 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] IC-7800. (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@attbi.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 08:37:53 -0500
Well, (no flame intended), I didn't find the discussion particularly thoughtful at all. In fact the gentlemen just plain got it wrong. The Orion display is clear, crisp, and informative. ALL of the i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00531.html (10,401 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] IC-7800 (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@attbi.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 11:52:43 -0500
Can't we just get off this color thing? It's a pointless discussion. If someone wants to buy radio with color then let them eat cake. It won't hear better -- but if it floats your boat then by all me
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00537.html (13,242 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] TT MoJo Alert - HIGH (score: 1)
Author: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@attbi.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 12:42:13 -0500
TT mojo? This is the T-E-N-T-E-C list -- contrary to popular belief that it has become the "see, we told you Icom would be the very bestest, and we'll all be happier if we send our dollars offshore"
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00541.html (8,110 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Orion Software v1.341 (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 07:47:27 +0000
Monitor audio is a bit low. Perhaps this will be in a firmware change somewhere along the line. In the meantime, just turn up the audio gain a bit. Grant/NQ5T
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00580.html (15,263 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] In re color displays, etc. (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 07:52:37 +0000
Doesn't say much for hams, does it. Maybe the real winner will be the combo transceiver/datebook/GameBoy ... and something that you can play those .. uh, well, .. you know ... MPG and AVI files you c
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00581.html (7,022 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] Re: IC-7800 Product Literature (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 08:00:44 +0000
And the 781 was an absolutely awful AM radio. Terrible on receive, truly lousy on transmit. Hopefully, the 7800 (or whatever they call the US version) will be better. The Orion is GREAT!! on AM, for
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00582.html (10,677 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] An Orion Oops?? (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Sun, 18 May 2003 23:37:59 +0000
That is a pretty big oops .. Easy to imagine how the person at the assembly station could grab the wrong connector, but not so easy to imagine how the error wouldn't get caught at the next step -- wh
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00618.html (8,111 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Rock-bound & snivlin' (was 60M) (score: 1)
Author: nq5t@attbi.com
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 01:29:48 +0000
It's pretty simple really. This style of frequency assignment is typical of MIL channel assignments, MARS specifically. For MARS at least, the normal operating standard is to set the dial frequency 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00642.html (9,602 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu