- 21. [TenTec] Orion SWR protection (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 01:44:12 -0400
- I'm reading through the manual and can't find a specification or other description of how the protective circuitry works in the event of excessive SWR. The reason this is important is that my QSK-mod
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00229.html (7,970 bytes)
- 22. Re: [TenTec] Orion SWR protection (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 08:35:38 -0400
- At 05:33 AM 5/9/03 -0400, you wrote: The specification of "25 amperes" covers ORION's performance under all specified conditions, but if your antenna impedance is between 50 and 100 ohms, including m
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00232.html (8,752 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TenTec] Orion SWR protection (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 10:59:12 -0400
- At 02:09 PM 5/9/03 +0000, you wrote: The Orion has protective circuitry to limit the current in the finals to a safe value. There is no point where SWR "fold back" occurs. It just won't let the curre
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00239.html (8,194 bytes)
- 24. Re: [TenTec] DC Power Supply Backup (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2003 14:58:24 -0400
- At 10:02 AM 5/21/03 -0400, you wrote: Has anyone ever done anything like this? Is it even necessary or is there enough residual energy in the PS filter caps that brief interruptions (typically <10 se
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00756.html (9,845 bytes)
- 25. Re: [TenTec] Off center knobs (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 07:46:49 -0400
- One thing I really like about the control arrangement, is that there are NO analog controls on the panel. ALL of the rotating controls are shaft encoders. No pots to wear out, or get scratchy -- and
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00820.html (9,658 bytes)
- 26. Re: [TenTec] Orion Audio Whine (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 07:56:18 -0400
- It's most noticeable on CW because when a narrow BW is selected the receiver noise level is much less, so I sure hope that Ten-Tec can correct this anomaly because it might cause problems with hearin
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00821.html (7,974 bytes)
- 27. Re: [TenTec] Orion Relfector (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 16:56:37 -0400
- At 04:03 PM 5/23/03 -0400, Ken Burrough wrote: I was warned by N4LQ, Steve about the Spam on Yahoo and he was right. I filled in their "privacy policy" stating not to give out any of my info, well gu
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00930.html (9,401 bytes)
- 28. Re: [TenTec] For Sale, Omni V & Paragon in England. (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 07:10:07 -0400
- I'm sympathetic to the folks who want to keep this the central repository of TenTec info, including the Orion. But the combination of many buy/sell ads, a reflector that defaults to replying to the w
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00953.html (8,172 bytes)
- 29. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ DSP (score: 1)
- Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:58:47 -0400
- At 11:16 AM 4/29/03 -0600, M.Todd Miskel wrote: I agree that the DSP on my 6+ is mediocre at best for SSB work. I am planning on getting either the Clear speech base unit DSP and installing it inside
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00789.html (7,774 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu