Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n4LQ@iglou.com: 1618 ]

Total 1618 documents matching your query.

321. [TenTec] Orion tech specs (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:41:10 -0500
True and don't forget the TS-870 which uses DSP for both receive/transmit filtering, tx audio equalization and AGC. Looking at the diagrams, I can't see where TenTec did anything new with the Pegasus
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00479.html (11,229 bytes)

322. [TenTec] Omni D vs Delta (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 18:54:04 -0500
Working from memory...The Omni D came out around 1979-80. The 580 a few years later. The Omni had a 9mhz IF chain while the Delta 580 had 6.3mhz. I believe the change in frequency cleared up some pro
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00480.html (8,432 bytes)

323. [TenTec] Orion tech specs (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 20:25:31 -0500
Yes the original Omni 6 had DSP and was used a low pass filter to "tone down" the hiss from the IF amplifiers. Prior to that, the Omni 5 used a simple tone control. So that was 1990. About all I can
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00483.html (8,701 bytes)

324. [TenTec] Omni D vs Delta (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 21:10:28 -0500
Oh yea and I forgot to mention the Omni had a tuneable preselector and the Delta came along with low pass receive filters for each band. Steve Ellington N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Winston F.
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00488.html (10,795 bytes)

325. [TenTec] Omni D vs Delta (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 07:14:52 -0500
This is amazing! We are up to 4 different colors for the same rig. ES Green, Dark Grey (gray?), Brown and finally Bronze.
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00503.html (11,603 bytes)

326. [TenTec] OMNI VI and ICOM 756 (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 13:31:51 -0500
Which Omni 6 and which 756? 6+ and Pro or just the original 6 and 756?
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00509.html (7,115 bytes)

327. [TenTec] re 756pro2 vs omni 6 plus (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:26:00 -0500
He was really asking about the original 756 not the Pro which is a totally different reciever. QST did mention the rough audio in the Pro but that it was cleared up in the ProII.
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00544.html (8,925 bytes)

328. [TenTec] Logikey K-3 installed in OMNI V? (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 12:30:11 -0500
Sure. It would be rather easy to do this but you will need to consider the control knob or button. Personally I don't see any good reason for doing this. You would need to add a paddle jack on the ri
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00545.html (7,893 bytes)

329. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 18:12:47 -0500
Since you brought it up; Is there any test equipment that would show "microchirp"? It's easy to hear but how about viewing it on a scope? Steve Ellington N4LQ To: <tentec@contesting.com>
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00553.html (15,322 bytes)

330. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: N4LQ@igLou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 21:49:07 -0500
You mean theres not some kind of fancy spectrum analyzer that could measure it? Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Paul Christensen" <paulc@mediaone.net> To: "Steve Ellington" <n4lq@iglou.com>;
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00563.html (18,704 bytes)

331. [TenTec] ZIPPER ? (score: 1)
Author: N4LQ@igLou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 18:41:28 -0500
Sounds like rrrrrrrpppppp? Steve N4LQ -- Original Message -- From: "Clark Savage Turner" <csturner@falcon.csc.calpoly.edu> To: "kb0pe" <kb0pe@netzero.net> Cc: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday,
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00578.html (7,900 bytes)

332. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:41:29 -0500
The most beautiful sounding cw note I ever heard was that of a Drake TR3. I can remember hearing it some 37 years ago! Just a few days ago, I heard one again and I was overwhelmed. One of these days,
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00587.html (11,470 bytes)

333. [TenTec] Fwd: Topband: More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:46:45 -0500
That's a great idea for a contest but the poor slob running a Lakeshore Phasemaster 2b and Hallicrafters SX101A would be at a big disadvantage for his run rate. Let's see.....what's the shortest rig
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00588.html (11,247 bytes)

334. [TenTec] Tentec540 (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 07:48:07 -0500
Gee, you just got it and want to mess it up already? I don't remember any mods to that simple rig Kevin. Just enjoy it as is for a while.
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00589.html (7,556 bytes)

335. [TenTec] 40 Meter QRP T-Kit Transceiver (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:15:28 -0500
The speaker causes that. I scrapped the speaker and mounted a little keyer board in it's place. The speaker magnet has a profound effect on that vfo torroid! You can change the range of the vfo by sq
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00601.html (8,523 bytes)

336. [TenTec] Tentec540 (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:19:26 -0500
That was me. I did it to the Omni C. Here's the link. http://www.albany.net/~bg/Mods/sidetone.htm --Original Message-- From: "Paul Christensen" <paulc@mediaone.net> To: <n4lq@iglou.com>, "Kevin Murph
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00602.html (9,295 bytes)

337. [TenTec] Tentec540 (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 13:06:09 -0500
It's not my website. To: <tentec@contesting.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00605.html (11,370 bytes)

338. [TenTec] More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (n4lq@iglou.com)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:35:34 -0500
The "digital" sound is sometimes hard to detect to the untrained ear. It seems to show up best during either deep fades when phase distortion enhances it or when the signal is very strong. Switching
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00608.html (10,312 bytes)

339. [TenTec] More About Clix (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:08:37 -0500
Dear JT: Your application for ear training has been accepted. (begin) Train your ear by establishing a clean point of reference then find a way to alternate between the reference and the test model.
/archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00614.html (13,425 bytes)

340. [TenTec] binaural CW? (score: 1)
Author: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 10:43:21 -0400
This is why dogs 'cock' their heads. The sound waves arrive at different times producing a phase shift and improving copy. My poodle can copy 50wpm this way but he never tells me what he hears. Steve
/archives//html/TenTec/2001-04/msg00008.html (10,078 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu