Mail Archive Search: <+from:m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Fw: Fw: The End of Incentive Licensing! (score: 1): Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss); Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2000 21:05:15 -0800; Hoorah Keith WB2VUO!!! I could not agree more. To the whiners do something or desist. Or is being a popular member of the whining herd more important??? Mark, KB8GKZ To: <tentec@contesting.com> -- FA; /archives//html/TenTec/2000-01/msg00034.html (10,763 bytes)
2. [TenTec] WTB Corsair-2 & Accessories (score: 1): Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss); Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 23:27:50 -0800; I am looking for an excellent condx Corsair-2 with all CW filters and if possible accessories. Mark, KB8GKZ m.rauchfuss@att.net 480 614-5279 -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Sub; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00034.html (6,786 bytes)
3. [TenTec] 8KC SSB Signals (score: 1): Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss); Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 06:57:28 -0800; Anthony, I agree with you, many operators fail to use the mic gain control properly and it results in splatter. The current axiom followed by the inept would appear to be "maximum gain must be better; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00241.html (9,653 bytes)
4. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1): Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss); Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:14:46 -0800; No Don, You are incorrect!!! That is why SINGLE SIDE band became to be a winner, precisely for the very reason that you cite. You see, with SINGLE SIDE BAND that it is possible to have the signal str; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00288.html (9,723 bytes)
5. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1): Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss); Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 22:36:36 -0800; No you did not. However you appear to have missed the social exposure to the principles of courtesy and to the engineering practices of conservation of scarce resources (ie band space), Mark, KB8GKZ; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00289.html (9,418 bytes)
6. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1): Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss); Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 23:23:31 -0800; Yuo are correct, Chuck. I did not employ a bit of levity. I suppose that I have been worn down by thoughtless behavios of so many fellow hams. It saddens and annoys me that we all fail to think. mark; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00291.html (11,074 bytes)
7. [TenTec] wide signals (score: 1): Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss); Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 21:16:17 -0800; Mike, I quite agree. Mark, KB8GKZ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tent; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00300.html (11,635 bytes)
8. [TenTec] SIDETONE (score: 1): Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss); Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 19:25:56 -0800; Hello to everyone, I just purchased a Corsair-II which I have not received as yet, and I wondered whether I should sell my Omni-D (with 30 and 12 M and all filters)? How does the Corsair-II stack up; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00634.html (10,116 bytes)
9. NOT Re: [TenTec] SIDETONE...but rather; Corsair-II vs Omni-D on CW (score: 1): Author: m.rauchfuss@worldnet.att.net (Mark Rauchfuss); Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 19:40:20 -0800; Sorry Guys, Mark -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00635.html (11,286 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]