- 1. [TenTec] Wanted to Purchase: OMNI VI+ [factory] (score: 1)
- Author: Kirby Nesbitt <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:08:45 -0700
- Looking to purchase a late production OMNI VI+ . Must be a orig factory model in mint condition. Radio and accessories must be from a smoke free environment from day 1. Am willing to pay a fair price
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00796.html (6,914 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] TCXO identification (score: 1)
- Author: Kirby Nesbitt <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 22:44:16 -0700
- I am wondering if someone might be able to tell me how to identify the TCXO in a OMNI VI+of which I am seriously considering purchasing. We suspect the radio does possess the TCXO based on its operat
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00033.html (6,917 bytes)
- 3. [TenTec] Keying Amp with my new Omni VI+ (score: 1)
- Author: Kirby Nesbitt <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:12:49 -0600
- Just wanted to solicit the list as to whether I will require an intermediate keying relay between my "new" Omni VI+ and a QRO HF-2500DX amp. Amp manual states that the t/r relay should be capable of
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00149.html (7,406 bytes)
- 4. [TenTec] RE : Re: Keying Amp with my new Omni VI+ (score: 1)
- Author: "knesbitt@nucleus.com" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 19:05:13 -0600
- Ken, thanks for the idea. I do believe the hf2500dx has the qsk feature, however I will have to confirm this when I get back home. In any event it would appear that the linear relay on the OMNI is mo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00217.html (9,961 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] RE : Keying Amp with my new Omni VI+ (score: 1)
- Author: "knesbitt@nucleus.com" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:29:49 -0600
- Assuming the QRO amp is QSK capable will this permit the safe use of the RELAY OUT on the OMNI in "semi break-in" mode (i.e: slow QSK). Theres no way I'm going to want to mess with manual PTT in a cw
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00273.html (9,268 bytes)
- 6. [TenTec] RE : Re: RE : Keying Amp with my new Omni VI+ (score: 1)
- Author: "knesbitt@nucleus.com" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 22:05:27 -0600
- The HF-2500Dx does not have a TX EN "ready for transmit" output. As such I would have to assume the high speed switching employed in the amp is engineering to handle the exciter power on key up. As o
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00315.html (8,720 bytes)
- 7. [TenTec] Still wishing to adopt, OMNI Model 564 (score: 1)
- Author: "knesbitt" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 15:29:27 -0600
- Looking for a buddy for my OMNI VI+. Interested in purchasing a late production, mint mod. 564 OMNI. Must be from a non-smoking home. Please email with particulars, including options and asking price
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00318.html (7,366 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] Whirlpool Duet RFI (score: 1)
- Author: "knesbitt" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 22:03:45 -0600
- As some may recall I reported a similiar situation with my neighbours Neptune washer a short while ago. I am still attempting to resolve the issue through formal channels however it would appear Mayt
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00127.html (13,516 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TenTec] [RFI] Whirlpool Duet RFI (score: 1)
- Author: "knesbitt" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 20:14:41 -0600
- Lee, good move on your part. File a letter of complaint with both the FCC and cc ARRL. We need another "Electric Blanket" action set into motion. Believe me, if you have a few of these move in around
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00141.html (8,073 bytes)
- 10. Re: [RFI] [TenTec] Whirlpool Duet RFI (score: 1)
- Author: "knesbitt" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 23:13:31 -0600
- Is a washing machine with an electronic motor controller a digital device or an appliance? If its defined under more general terms as a "appliance" would there not be a better chance of having emissi
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00336.html (10,779 bytes)
- 11. Re: [TenTec] Whirlpool Duet, Neptune, Orion (score: 1)
- Author: "knesbitt" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 14:00:07 -0600
- GE....are these the same guys that make jet engines (or used to)?? Kirb, VE6IV General Electric used to have (and may still have) what they call a "Value Improvement Program." Best I could tell, what
- /archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00400.html (9,491 bytes)
- 12. [TenTec] O2 Noise Reduction (score: 1)
- Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 16:42:21 -0700
- HNY all, just wondering what the collective thoughts may be with regard to the O2's NR capabilities, more specifically, how the Orion's NR stacks up against the same in the Icom 756 ProIII? I am curr
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00174.html (7,492 bytes)
- 13. Re: [TenTec] O2 Noise Reduction (score: 1)
- Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2006 17:19:37 -0700
- Thanks for the quick input. Carl/Ron, my noise seems to be only "phased" by the use of DSP NR. The blanker seems to have very little effect. Most of my sources are wideband hash from switching suppli
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00178.html (11,276 bytes)
- 14. [TenTec] For Sale: Omni VI+ (Mod. 564, late prod.) , 962 P.S./Speaker (score: 1)
- Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:46 -0700
- Have decided to sell one of my prized beauties to fund the purchase of a new Orion2. As such, I would like to offer to the TT list members first, a late production (2000 MY) factory OMNI VI+ (mod. 56
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00302.html (8,111 bytes)
- 15. Re: [TenTec] Editing (score: 1)
- Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:12:22 -0700
- Q: I currently have a feed-thru PVC pipe transitioning through the basement wall containing 2 runs of LMR-400. These runs extend through the entrance port, into a junction box outside, and up the wal
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-01/msg00705.html (9,455 bytes)
- 16. Re: [TenTec] Orion II Reviews (score: 1)
- Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 21:14:49 -0700
- Maybe, just maybe the obscene $15,000 CAD sticker has tended to limit its proliferation. Kirb, VE6IV -- _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http:
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00083.html (7,532 bytes)
- 17. Re: [TenTec] Orion II delivered (score: 1)
- Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:00:51 -0700
- My experience as well. Ten Tec will ship via FedEx at your request. You pay the difference in cost between the two services. In my case it was well worth the extra dollars given the fact UPS charges
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00329.html (8,912 bytes)
- 18. Re: [TenTec] 2054 (score: 1)
- Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:15:30 -0700
- Does Ten-Tec publish or make available, a running bug-list so that the users (not just the beta testers), can determine whether a particular idiosyncrasy has already been reported? It would certainly
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg00724.html (7,894 bytes)
- 19. Re: [TenTec] Orion shipping (score: 1)
- Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2006 11:51:15 -0700
- Yikes! I hope this was an isolated case. I have mine specified for FedEx 2-day air into Canada to avoid the nightmare we call UPS. I will never see the rig (at my request) should the same happen here
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-02/msg01099.html (8,275 bytes)
- 20. Re: [TenTec] Sweep on OII (score: 1)
- Author: "root [knesbitt]" <knesbitt@nucleus.com>
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 21:51:21 -0700
- Pretty much my question Toby. Possibly someone might elaborate on how fast you have to tune before the sweep stops altogether. Not withstanding Carl's method, I do not see how the sweep is of much us
- /archives//html/TenTec/2006-03/msg00577.html (10,579 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu