Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k8vt@ameritech.net: 247 ]

Total 247 documents matching your query.

61. [TenTec] MMRTTY+ Omni 6 question (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 13:04:32 -0500
This may not be the right place to ask, but as there is a lot of technical talent here, let me give it a shot... When I was using the Ka-Gold program and a KAM+ TNC for rag chewing and using Writelog
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00073.html (9,014 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] MMRTTY+ Omni 6 question (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2014 15:28:17 -0500
Jim, Thanks for the response...and here are a couple of comments on your comments.:-) In FSK mode, the TX frequency does NOT track MMTTY's AFC. This is true -- but I am a true FSK believer. Possibly,
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00076.html (10,401 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] "Reasonable Price for Paragon II with PS? (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 09:03:24 -0500
On 2/6/2014 10:22 AM, Woody Demitz wrote: I would appreciate thoughts on what a "reasonable" price is for a Paragon II with power supply. It is to be offered in an SK estate sale in the next few days
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00097.html (9,367 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 15:12:04 -0500
Just to be clear, these guys were not giving me grief but I still don't like being the guy who is off frequency all the time even though I often run old, old gear. The Corsair (I) is not a candidate
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00272.html (10,816 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:05:18 -0500
PS: Old Drake gear. Wonderful. I hope you still have it. Yes, I do -- and still in mint condition. The back story... I bought a brand new R4B when I was in the Chicago area for a 13 week Bell System
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00276.html (10,947 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] Does this happen to you on transmit...OMNI V ?? (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:58:26 -0500
On 2/24/2014 5:29 PM, Scott Shepard wrote: I am going thru a variety of projects presently and am now at the omni V ...it seems on most bands above 80 m if I increase power to past 3/4 point the disp
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-02/msg00303.html (9,693 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Rumor (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 07:00:22 -0400
I heard a rumor about Ten Tec this weekend at the Ten Tec factory and Hmmmm... But maybe THEY won't say anything until you do. A classic "Catch 22". :-D
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00027.html (8,121 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Rumor (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 22:48:24 -0400
It`s not that I can`t keep a secret; it`s the people I tell! Well then, you just have to invoke the old Mafia policy: "Three people can keep a secret...as long as two of them are dead."
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-10/msg00041.html (8,626 bytes)

69. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2013 08:53:14 -0400
Sorry, but I gotta ask... Is the "wetting agent" conductive -- or at least more conductive than rain water?
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00001.html (8,983 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 20:44:58 -0400
Well, here is my [inverse?] Keesler story... I was in the Air National Guard from 1970 to 1976 as an "avionics" tech (forgot the actual MOS). Basically I had two choices: either go to Biloxi for a 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00068.html (10,457 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] OCF antennas evolution (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 11:29:27 -0400
I smile when I see everybody describing their favorite wire antenna, so let me jump in with my comments (asbestos suit on). <grin> Mike, not to deny your success nor picking on you or anyone else des
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00242.html (9,668 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 08:11:52 -0400
I'm not sure what is "preferred", but what I use is a large DPDT knife switch, one side to the tuner, the other position to ground. Although I don't use one, there is always the ever-popular dual spa
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00468.html (9,212 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] OT: THHN Wire in Germany (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:31:56 -0400
On 4/24/2013 9:11 AM, Paul Kraemer wrote: I have heard stranded is better than solid and contributes to wider bandwidth of the antenna. The more strands of finer wire is better? Comments? Paul K0UYA
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-04/msg00309.html (10,547 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] WTB: Older Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 08:24:50 -0500
I admire you explaining your reasoning to us and it seems to make sense...except for the following: You want to buy an old Jupiter to try out a DSP radio. Possibly you are overlooking the "old" part.
/archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00112.html (9,407 bytes)

75. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 18:36:11 -0500
Sorry to be a wise guy, but that is a question only you can answer... If you paid $20,000 for the radio, you made a bad decision. If you are asking (in a round about manner) if it is a good radio, th
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-12/msg00113.html (8,815 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] RF choke for Titan 425? (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 18:39:30 -0400
Why do you ask? Doesn't TenTec stock replacements?
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-10/msg00191.html (7,871 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] My First Ten-Tec - Marketing (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:57:21 -0400
Quirks? Yup...I had a 1976 and a 1977 300D (5 cylinder Diesels for those of you that may not be familiar with the product line), both purchased new. I had numerous (major) "quirks" with both of them
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00193.html (9,157 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] Paragon Problem gets very odd (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 16:57:28 -0400
Yes, actually quite common, especially on "dry" circuits (those without talk battery). Using their test set put current on the circuit, effectively (and temporarily) "sealing" noisy splices. This tes
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00324.html (10,701 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] Centurion Amplifier history (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 16:56:01 -0400
Well, a fair question...but the Centurion uses two 3-500 tubes. MY question would be: Are any *decent* 3-500s still available -- other than the Chinese imports (or getting lucky at the e-place)?
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-03/msg00137.html (9,558 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] OT: Scopes (score: 1)
Author: Carter <k8vt@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:54:11 -0500
On 2/18/2012 2:14 PM, Hulett, Russell wrote: I've avoided owning a scope, but the recent discussion about troubleshooting low power from an Omni D has me rethinking. Most of the gear I own now old, h
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-02/msg00366.html (9,595 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu