Mail Archive Search: <+from:k5uj@hotmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:k5uj@hotmail.com: 481 ]

Total 481 documents matching your query.

241. [TenTec] RFI and Orion mic connector - bad info (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 17:06:55 +0000; Not my point. I have no idea how you ever got that out of what I wrote Pete. <<<On the other hand, if your point is that one should accept that any piece of gear is susceptable to RF and you must acc; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00422.html (8,995 bytes)
242. [TenTec] IC7800 (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 18:18:44 +0000; Ahhh ... it reminds me of the old days around here discussing and cussing the Orion :-) Um, if I may inject a note of impartiality here, I think your memory is faulty. Go look at the IC7800 yahoo gro; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00429.html (8,467 bytes)
243. [TenTec] Boeing and BPL (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 16:57:57 +0000; Not sure if the Boeing filing is gg to be much help or not. It can't hurt, but I've noticed the non-ham players (Boeing, Nat. Acad. Sci. et al.) are understandably confining their remarks to their ow; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00120.html (7,638 bytes)
244. [TenTec] BC RFI, and fans (was Orion cooling) (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 03:29:20 +0000; I've experienced the same thing here with my loop. I'm 10 to 15 miles away from three clear (in name only these days) channel 50 kw broadcast station transmitter sites, all omni-directional with 1/2; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00194.html (8,892 bytes)
245. [TenTec] New emission standards for HF...ham rigs not BPL (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 09 May 2004 03:58:41 +0000; Am I the only one to find some irony in FCC being concerned about spurious emissions from ham HF rigs, but wanting to pollute HF with BPL? rob/K5UJ From ARRL Letter, V. 23, no. 19: The most extensive; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00202.html (8,301 bytes)
246. [TenTec] New Yaesu Rig: Joke's on you guys (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 21:50:53 +0000; While some of you are gleefully bashing the new Yaesu rig here, I'd like to point out one, to you all no doubt minor, but nevertheless significant item: If you go to http://www.yaesu-museum.de/Galler; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00482.html (8,087 bytes)
247. [TenTec] Sorry, URL gremlins (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 22:37:54 +0000; Sorry, the website URL gremlins got me. Re my last message, you have to scroll down and click on the left side link for the FT DX 9K. Rob/K5UJ ________________________________________________________; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00483.html (7,044 bytes)
248. [TenTec] XLR jack (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 14:39:41 +0000; Ron, I think the older analog phasing method was not entirely without problems. I currently use dsp for phase cancellation ssb generation. You are right--the improvement over filtering is quite good,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00499.html (7,070 bytes)
249. [TenTec] Loop antennas (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 13:22:41 +0000; Don, I found most of the information I used for my type of loop antenna at the ARRL Technical Info. Service webpage on loops. You don't say what kind of loop antenna you are interested in. Did you kn; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00710.html (8,158 bytes)
250. [TenTec] QSK (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 13:33:20 +0000; I've found QSK useful in handling traffic (but why in 2004 we still have a cw NTS is beyond me) where the rx station can break me for fills immediately, and in ragchewing, and calling DX in a pileup; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00712.html (7,518 bytes)
251. [TenTec] Orion Issues (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 03:57:07 +0000; <<<Chill out dude. This is what reflectors are for. When I want nothing but good news, I read QST reviews.>>> Steve, it is my painful duty to inform you that your continued membership in the Ten Tec; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00756.html (8,325 bytes)
252. [TenTec] re INRAD mod for omni vi+ (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 23:25:46 +0000; The mod is supposed to give a flatter frequency response in the rx audio passband. The stock response curve shows it dropping off on the higher audio frequencies as I recall but don't hold me to that; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00888.html (8,639 bytes)
253. [TenTec] HyTower radials (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 14:12:18 +0000; I have heard the same thing Bill mentioned. There are two 160 conversion kits sold by MFJ (Hygain) for the hytower: one involves the base loading coil and is not very good. The other turns the hytowe; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00095.html (7,536 bytes)
254. [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 14:25:32 +0000; Bob, what i would do is get a separate rx and one of those frequency standards that used to be available (don't know if they still are or not) that consisted of a 1 mhz xtal oscillator in a small box; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00096.html (7,747 bytes)
255. [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:21:57 +0000; I have had the same experience on SSB with the Omni VI I use. I have been told I am off frequency by the station I'm talking to, and if I move the vfo down about 30 or 40 hz (this on LSB) they will s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00127.html (7,700 bytes)
256. [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 22:49:12 +0000; I'd like to know what frequency(ies) they're operating on. Rob/K5UJ <<<Duane, Those are members of Tau Epsilon Beta, otherwise known as the Order of Tin Eared Baboons! 73, Frank, K4VMO -- Original Me; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00141.html (9,183 bytes)
257. [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 23:08:06 +0000; <<<The typical SSB bandpass system is only about 2.4 KHz wide no matter what one does to it or tries to cram through it.>>> Well, this was true until around 1992 or so. Most new rigs of the past 10 y; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00143.html (9,480 bytes)
258. [TenTec] transceiver test (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 00:06:36 +0000; I wish all the guys who think their bandscopes on their Pro IIs are professional grade spectrum analyzers would read what follows as well. Rob/K5UJ <<<I wish everyone would read the below statements; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00145.html (9,902 bytes)
259. [TenTec] Re: Contesting--Color displays (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 14:59:05 +0000; When Orion was first coming out, I made the suggestion on this reflector, to have a monitor output jack on the rear panel, so that a user could plug in and operate with a bigger flat screen LCD color; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00280.html (9,781 bytes)
260. [TenTec] re Orion popping (score: 1): Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 22:54:30 +0000; I hope this will help: on my omni vi, there used to be a spike on SSB tx when I'd hit the PTT switch, and a tiny one on release. it was probably there on vox too, but more hidden since the tx is voic; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00659.html (7,968 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]