Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3tx@fast.net: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [TenTec] 252mo PS Question (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 23:27:35 -0500
YES that is correct and there is no adjustment for the voltage. The trim pot you see if you take the lid of is for the trip current. 73, Mike W3TS All, I just got hold of an old 252mo power supply fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00784.html (8,710 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] 263 Remote VFO PTO (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 18:16:48 -0500
My Allen knob wrench mikes 0.0494 across flats. Wish I knew the exact size wrench but yes on most TT gear you must remove all knobs and front panel to access the screws holding the PTO on the frame.
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00763.html (8,886 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] real CW ops (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 22:36:26 -0400
My own opinion, for what it's worth, as a near 100% CW op: The computer sending, though theoretically technically perfect, sounds so artificial that I find it not the best to copy. The keyer with iam
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00180.html (11,428 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] real CW ops (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 11:45:36 -0400
100% agree. The keyboard-sending is bad enough. Dave, K3TX **On an entirely different topic I'd like input on a current project here. Our local township, Falls, in Bucks Co, PA (across the Delaware f
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00191.html (14,566 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] real CW ops (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 12:05:01 -0400
I like that definition. K3TX That's the difference between a "typist" and a "real CW opr." :-) (I know a few keyboard users that AVOID the punctuation and full spelling of every word, and just type t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00192.html (9,697 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] 'Real CW?' (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 13:30:56 -0400
I have to agree with both of you. Of course the microphone is (at first) so much easier to use. Most everyone can talk. CW can be easy for some and very rough for others. Regardless, it's really up t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00245.html (10,508 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] YACWD and real CW ops (FCC) (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 12:41:16 -0400
The last of the full-time FCC examiners was Joe Welsh at the Philadelphia office. SK for many years now, but Joe was as nice and friendly a guy as you'd care to meet. He was an active ham - I forget
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00297.html (10,841 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] 'Real CW?' (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 00:22:01 -0400
I'd imagine your experience and mine apply to most everyone, though most seem to learn the code a bit faster. As for T-T CW superiority, I'd tried various rice boxes - Yaseu = pure garbage; Kenwood =
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00314.html (9,892 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] ARRL "regulation by bandwidth" (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 00:56:47 -0400
Look back at the record about 30 years ago. ARRL was not the instigator of incentive licensing. It was FCC; ARRL did what could be done to make what FCC was going to do anyway as acceptable as possib
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00401.html (10,559 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Orion and TVI (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 20:28:12 -0400
As an RFI engineer and long term (45 years) TVI committee chairman I pose my first - and most important - question: "Is the interference on every single nearby TV receiver?" If one and only one nearb
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00679.html (12,316 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Omni D External VFO Schematic (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 16:58:02 -0400
Do you mean the mod. 243 external VFO? If so I have the manual - only 12 pages; a photocopy would be no problem. K3TX If anyone has handy the External VFO schematic for the Omni A-C series in digital
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00094.html (7,946 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Omni D External VFO Schematic (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 19:04:19 -0400
I have the 243 VFO manual - would you like a copy? K3TX If anyone has handy the External VFO schematic for the Omni A-C series in digital format I sure could use one. My external system needs a bit o
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00299.html (7,866 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Omni D Schematic/Manual (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 11:55:12 -0400
I have the Omni D book and can photocopy if needed. K3TX Turn the ALC control completely clockwise and leave it there always. Does that help? Don, W4DON Acquired a Omni D that has a low power output
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00316.html (8,300 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] More than Orion (was: ORION, THE TERRIBLE 12) (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 00:05:41 -0400
I echo Catilyn. I tried the JA big 3, every time the top of the lines; someone loaned me a 544 Triton and I found the difference amazing. The only real on-line comparison was with a friend about 30 m
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00099.html (9,779 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] should I buy a FT-1000D (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 23:24:45 -0400
I can't help you much. I had one experience owning Yaesu - and there'll never be a second. Anyone with a bitch about TT operation - service - support - etc should give Yaesu a try. A sure cure. And y
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00644.html (13,466 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] was - "Radiates like Crazy"???? No (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 18:46:30 -0400
That 73 article says nothing more than when a band's open any sort of antenna will work something. Absolutely no mention of az or el radiation patterns. Or the all-important field comparison with a h
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00276.html (11,705 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits" (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 18:48:57 -0400
Where did that 3.05 ft per meter come from? Looks more like 3.28+ ft/meter. Just remember two ratios: 2.54 cm/in and 39.37 in/meter. And in finer measurements, l mm = about 0.040 inch. Your system of
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00406.html (13,718 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] FCC says CW dead (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:11:48 -0400
Agree. Gosh, any moron can pick up a mike. Now sending and receiving cw at 30 wpm is an art. CW is ham radio. jim, K4CFA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00709.html (7,639 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] FCC says CW dead (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 17:11:47 -0400
Agree. Gosh, any moron can pick up a mike. Now sending and receiving cw at 30 wpm is an art. CW is ham radio. jim, K4CFA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@con
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00710.html (7,648 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Old Omni/30 mtrs (score: 1)
Author: "DaveHeller" <k3tx@fast.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:26:06 -0400
$50 for a WORKING Omni D? That's not a bargain. It's grand larceny. Invest another couple $ in a manual from T=T - I think they're in stock and if not I'll make a photo of mine. It's short on bells a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00735.html (9,552 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu