Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k3ghh@arrl.net: 74 ]

Total 74 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] OMNI 6 (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:00:57 -0400
John, why are you shouting? -- John K3GHH
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-04/msg00319.html (7,170 bytes)

62. [TenTec] Default LCW BW 1000Hz (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 08:10:56 -0400
After a recent update of O2 firmware to 2.044A, when I first turn the rig on its bandwidth (on LCW mode) is 1000 Hz. When I turn the rig off the bandwidth is usually 500 Hz and often less -- certainl
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00185.html (7,339 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] Default LCW BW 1000Hz (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 13:44:48 -0400
Thanks, Hank... but they're both off. -- John K3GHH
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00190.html (8,753 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] Default LCW BW 1000Hz (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2011 16:42:28 -0400
Thanks, Ray. That did it! I never would have thought of that on my own. --John K3GHH -- John K3GHH
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-03/msg00193.html (9,694 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] Test (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 08:41:34 -0500
I don't know, Mike... I thought I detected a little chirp. -- John K3GHH
/archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00421.html (8,122 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] CW Weighting setting for Orion II on firmware 2.039d (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:15:00 -0400
Thanks, Mark KA4ICK I'm just using the defaults, Mark: 100% and 5ms. (That's one of many things about the Orion I haven't yet experimented with.) From the manual's description the 3:1 dah:dit ratio
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-04/msg00051.html (7,754 bytes)

67. [TenTec] OT: Popular Science archives (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:45:04 -0400
I picked this up on one of my other groups, where it was described with this quote: We've partnered with Google to offer our entire 137-year archive for free browsing. Each issue appears just as it d
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-03/msg00166.html (7,628 bytes)

68. [TenTec] Low-pass filter? (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 20:57:35 -0500
Is a low-pass filter advisable or necessary with modern equipment (like my O2)? When I became active again in the mid-80s I automatically installed my old (1950s era) E. F. Johnson cylindrical LPF be
/archives//html/TenTec/2010-02/msg00357.html (6,877 bytes)

69. [TenTec] Narrow signal on 28.027620 MHz (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:05:25 -0500
Trying to work the 10-meter contest that just ended from my high-noise QTH, I found a very narrow heterodyne on my Orion II, just one sideband from 28,027,618 to 28,027,627 Hz. (With my step set norm
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-12/msg00122.html (8,112 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Narrow signal on 28.027620 MHz (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:42:50 -0500
Well, I guess what I'm asking is if this is internal to the Orion II; do other O2 owners find this narrow signal? (It's still here this snowy Maryland morning...) -- John, K3GHH
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-12/msg00152.html (8,712 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] Narrow signal on 28.027620 MHz (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:32:33 -0500
Still there, Fred; no change in strength. (I should have thought to do that myself...) John K3GHH wrote: Trying to work the 10-meter contest that just ended from my high-noise QTH, I found a very nar
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-12/msg00155.html (9,860 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] Narrow signal on 28.027620 MHz (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 16:55:52 -0500
Ken Brown wrote: I found a very narrow heterodyne What do you mean by "very narrow heterodyne?" Is it a single CW carrier? Why do you say it is very narrow? Is is so super pure that you can tell it h
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-12/msg00158.html (14,795 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] Narrow signal on 28.027620 MHz (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:55:36 -0500
Ken Brown wrote: It does not go away; same signal strength (I'd give it about a 7 on our RST scale). I don't know how to add attenuation at the antenna; are these the step attenuators I've seen that
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-12/msg00160.html (11,819 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] Narrow signal on 28.027620 MHz (score: 1)
Author: John K3GHH <k3ghh@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2009 03:16:35 -0500
Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote: On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 16:55 -0500, John K3GHH wrote: Ken Brown wrote: I found a very narrow heterodyne What do you mean by "very narrow heterodyne?" Is it a single CW car
/archives//html/TenTec/2009-12/msg00168.html (15,480 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu