Mail Archive Search: <+from:jsb@digistar.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jsb@digistar.com: 153 ]

Total 153 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] NAR filter in Omni VI (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 16:02:50 -0400 (EDT); I have an Omni VI with 2.4K, 1.8K, 500 and 250hz filters but the NAR slot is empty. Can someone tell me what I would add to the NAR filter for CW operation and why would I want to do this when the fi; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00290.html (7,008 bytes)
82. Re: [TenTec] NAR filter in Omni VI (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 17:51:19 -0400; Jim Brown wrote: That's a really good question, Jason. I've made very careful (and fairly precise) spectrum measurements of my Omni V (just back from factory alignment) with exactly that set of TenTe; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00295.html (10,722 bytes)
83. Re: [TenTec] NAR filter in Omni VI (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 17:55:16 -0400; Carl Moreschi wrote: I used to run two 250 hertz filters in my Omni V. It worked very well. With PBT, you can get the effective passband as narrow as you want this way. This helps the signal to noise; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00297.html (8,115 bytes)
84. Re: [TenTec] FS: CW Filters 217 & 285 (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 07:07:17 -0400; hi - do you still have the 217? I'd like to buy it. Thanks, Jason Randy Brothers wrote: For sale: Excellent condition filters from Omni VI-- $69 each via priority mail con us. MO or paypal. 73, Randy; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00343.html (7,812 bytes)
85. [TenTec] WTB: Ten-Tec CW filters - 217, 219 (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 09:46:33 -0400 (EDT); Looking for TenTec filters in good condition - Model 219 250hz 9mhz IF, Model 217 500hz 9mhz IF _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00345.html (6,497 bytes)
86. [TenTec] Filters: ringing and insertion loss (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:42:55 -0400; I found some old threads about TenTec filters not ringing where INRAD filters supposedly do. I also noticed that the INRAD filters have less insertion loss than the TenTec filters. Can anyone explain; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00455.html (6,834 bytes)
87. [TenTec] Centurion QSK relays - easily replaced? (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 08:56:45 -0400 (EDT); Just curious - do all Centurion amps, new and old, have the same relay? I remember the 422B had what looked to be a relay with a rubber sound-proofing cap on it. I've never seen the insides of the ol; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00561.html (6,837 bytes)
88. RE: [TenTec] Centurion QSK relays - easily replaced? (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 11:34:04 -0400 (EDT); Rats. Not a show-stopper though ;-) Ok - thanks for the reply! 73 Jason N1SU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mail; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00567.html (8,875 bytes)
89. Re: [TenTec] Yet another basic question (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:19:11 -0400; So, asking about your experiences with the Orion audio and types of headphones which seem to work the best. AKG K 240 DF are quite nice, light also. You could wear these for days. I use mine all the; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00622.html (8,255 bytes)
90. [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: jsb@digistar.com; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 09:49:47 -0400 (EDT); It's probably safe to say that the majority of CW ops using radios with good filtering systems to reduce background noise and proper sidetone adjustment prefer QSK - running QSK without getting the s; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00689.html (9,193 bytes)
91. [TenTec] QSK on Lake Shoshobocomo (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 22:19:47 -0400; al_lorona@agilent.com wrote: Finally, may I simply state that in listening to CW QSOs on the bands, I almost *never* hear true QSK operation, where the operators are breaking in on each other. I'd sa; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00738.html (9,286 bytes)
92. Re: [TenTec] re Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:31:07 -0400; Rob Atkinson, K5UJ wrote: If everyone could just back off on the PA collector current to prevent overdrive I guess there would be no need for external ALC control but then I don't think I'd see rear; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00841.html (7,834 bytes)
93. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 23:24:50 -0400; Steve N4LQ wrote: This is getting interesting. He checked and his 6+ has rev 1.02. Again, mine is 1.03. Then I found this in the archives: http://lists.contesting.com/archives/html/TenTec/2001-09/msg; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00928.html (9,452 bytes)
94. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 18:21:55 -0400; Paul Christensen wrote: Note: All the above is with firmware ver. 1.03. I have no idea what 1.02 does but apparently it does key faster. QSK with V1.02 is pretty damn fast as long as plug 52 is remov; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00954.html (9,410 bytes)
95. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 20:40:44 -0400; Paul Christensen wrote: What's plug #52? The mod consists of unplugging connector 52 on the I.F./A.F. Board. = Wow - this is quite nice. Disconnecting that plug makes sidetone work as I prefer, and b; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00959.html (9,247 bytes)
96. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:30:17 -0400; Bob Henderson wrote: The plug 52 problem arose because a segment of established Omni users expressed a strong preference for sidetone volume to be independent of RX AF gain setting. Ten Tec responded; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00967.html (14,003 bytes)
97. [TenTec] grounding dipoles (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 15:51:19 -0400; I have 3 dipoles on a single push-up pole about 4 or 5 feet apart on the pole - I use a 4-way antenna switch to switch from one antenna to the other. I'm curious if I should disconnect the dipoles i'; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00973.html (7,053 bytes)
98. Re: [TenTec] grounding dipoles (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 06:43:35 -0400; Ron Notarius wrote: Assuming that the dipoles are each for separate bands, I'd suggest just tying the coax together. RF will always flow down the path of least resistance (or reactance) so only the a; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00989.html (8,180 bytes)
99. [TenTec] WTB instant trip breaker (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 17:58:42 -0400; Anyone know where I can buy the T11-0-18.0A-21121-1 Airpax breaker (or identical equivalent)? I tried pocosales but they did not have this particular unit, only 20A fast trip (not instant trip). 73 J; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01000.html (6,727 bytes)
100. [TenTec] old Orion firmware (score: 1): Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 21:25:02 -0400; I have a chance to play with an Orion for a few days (if I drive to go get it) - was there ever a version of the Orion firmware which had "real" QSK at 70+ wpm? Would be neat to play with the older f; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01057.html (7,405 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]