Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jsb@digistar.com: 153 ]

Total 153 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TenTec] warming up of tubes (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 13:19:44 -0500 (EST)
I believe the official spec says 3 seconds however I would wait at least 5-10 seconds for the filaments to get to full intensity. By the time the fan gets spun up to full speed you will have given ev
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00714.html (8,295 bytes)

42. Re: [TenTec] Here We Go Again (was Spectrum Hogs) (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:31:20 -0500
Steve Baron - KB3MM wrote: How do you get it that wide ? Section 3.6.1 of the Jupiter manual, Transmitter Filter Bandwidth Press the MNU button on the front of the radio and adjust TX FILTER BW setti
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00729.html (8,661 bytes)

43. Re: [TenTec] 1.367 Orion Update (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 10:24:46 -0500
John Rippey wrote: I see that one of the changes in the new update has to do with the operation of RIT/XIT. Next I'd like to see Ten-Tec improve the operation of RIT/XIT on the Argonaut V per previou
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00874.html (7,610 bytes)

44. Re: [TenTec] Headphone clicks (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 14:01:08 -0500
Carl Moreschi wrote: If you use 32 ohm or higher impedance headphones, you won't hear the click. I was just suggesting a way for you to continue to use the same headphones. I don't have the click in
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01042.html (9,879 bytes)

45. Re: [TenTec] Headphone clicks (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 16:49:29 -0500
Jim Reid wrote: I use a pair of AKG K 240 DF 600ohm headphones. Going to the web site you give shows that they come with the mini-stereo connector plus an adapter to the standard 1/8" phono jack. Yea
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01054.html (10,660 bytes)

46. [TenTec] Boosting contesting scores by cheating via aid of computer (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:10:31 -0500
K3BU@aol.com wrote: We NEED PTT control for precise control and timing on CW by contesting programs!!! You need a computer program to send CW in a contest? That sounds like cheatin'!! :-) 73 Jason N1
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01064.html (9,224 bytes)

47. Re: [TenTec] Boosting contesting scores by cheating via aid ofcomputer (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 23:18:03 -0500
Dave Edwards wrote: But that's what contests are about these days!! Oh yeah, I guess that's why I don't participate in 'em ;-) I'd like to see the contest scores if a guy could only use pencil/paper
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01067.html (10,673 bytes)

48. Re: [TenTec] Re: K2/100, Orion review (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 09:47:28 -0500
Marijan Miletic, S56A wrote: P3F> Some of you guys should be less defensive of Ten Tec. And less offensive against JA products! If you would buy one of their radios for 3K5$ with all the teething pro
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01089.html (8,103 bytes)

49. Re: [TenTec] Boosting contesting scores by cheating via aidofcomputer (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 10:18:34 -0500
Michael Tope wrote: BTW, I see from your website that you use a vibroplex bug. Seems like you are not totally against crutches, Jason. What's the matter, can't you generate those dits by hand with a
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01092.html (11,104 bytes)

50. Re: [TenTec] Boosting contesting scores by cheating via aid ofcomputer (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 10:20:28 -0500
Rick Westerman wrote: Jason, what planet have you been living on? I'm only guessing but I doubt if any class in any major contest has been won by anyone NOT using a computer to send CW for at least 1
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01093.html (10,525 bytes)

51. Re: [TenTec] Boosting contesting scores by cheating via aid ofcomputer (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 10:23:01 -0500
ARDUJENSKI@aol.com wrote: Jason Soon these guys will turn their computers (er radios) on Friday evening and print out the logs on Monday morning (smile) Yep - I see it coming. 99% of the world's comm
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01094.html (8,225 bytes)

52. Re: [TenTec] Boosting contesting scores by cheating via aidofcomputer (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 10:37:39 -0500
RON ZOND wrote: maybe we should just turn on the rig and computer, run a program that does al the work, and let the best rig-computer combo win. Then all contesters use that combo. It would be intere
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01096.html (10,061 bytes)

53. Re: [TenTec] New Jupiter having trouble?? (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:49:08 -0500 (EST)
Auto Sweep is on - hit MNU and scroll to find AUTO SWEEP and turn it off. I have mine set for 120 wide so I can turn a fair bit but it's all preference. 73 Jason N1SU ________________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00125.html (7,991 bytes)

54. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter ALC mod (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:33:36 -0500
Mark Erbaugh wrote: The N9VV website ( www.N9VV.com ) mentions a mod to the Jupiter ALC circuit that is apparently approved by the factory. It involves replacing the 4.7 mF C107 with 2.2 mF. The webs
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00375.html (7,714 bytes)

55. Re: [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 14, Issue 68 - Sensitivity Issues (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:35:28 -0500
K3BU@aol.com wrote: Sayonara! Hooray! _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00795.html (8,622 bytes)

56. Re: [TenTec] Headphones for Orion (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:59:22 -0500 (EST)
I strongly recommend the AKG K 240 DF http://www.akg.com/products/powerslave,mynodeid,186,id,253,pid,253,_language,EN.html You can easily pop the side clip off and reverse the polarity if you so desi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00866.html (9,043 bytes)

57. [TenTec] cheap packet tnc for use on the road (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:35:09 -0500 (EST)
Does anyone have any recommendations for a 300bps TNC for use with the Jupiter? I want to run HF packet while travelling with my Jupiter - just wondering what everyone is using and recommends... and
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00093.html (7,281 bytes)

58. Re: [TenTec] Re: [WCARC] BPL Rollout A PLAN of ACTION (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 07:34:13 -0500
Stuart Rohre wrote: Absolutely NOT! I only advocated a legal scientific operations test, which is what The BPL companies have failed to DO! ARRL has asked for hams to collect information on RFI they
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00114.html (9,195 bytes)

59. [TenTec] tighter filter for Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: Jason Buchanan <jsb@digistar.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 17:34:00 -0500
Does anyone know if there is a way to get a tighter filter for the Jupiter? I find myself trying to squeeze the bandwidth filter tighter than 300Hz. There are times I wish I had 100Hz! :-) 73 Jason N
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00243.html (7,156 bytes)

60. Re: [TenTec] tighter filter for Jupiter (score: 1)
Author: jsb@digistar.com
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 09:04:43 -0500 (EST)
Thanks to all who replied. I would ultimately prefer to see the firmware modified slightly to further narrow the bandwidth instead of a post-AF stage filter. It seems, using MixW to analyze the outpu
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00261.html (8,969 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu