Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jrhallas@optonline.net: 117 ]

Total 117 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II ALC issue (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2004 18:41:07 -0500
My Corsair I didn't have that problem in full or semi-QSK. GL, Joel, W1ZR Steve N4LQ wrote: Does going to the "slow qsk" mode help? I think you are experiencing the typical audio derived agc syndrome
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00707.html (9,460 bytes)

2. Re: [TenTec] Centaur (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 18:11:56 -0500
Ron, Great question, and I will be watching the answers closely too. I fried an 811A in my Centaur the other day and can see the bottom of the spare bin very clearly now! The big question is, when I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01006.html (8,340 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] OUT OF HAM BAND MODIFICATION (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:29:30 -0500
Jim, Great tip, thanks much! I found the jumper just where you predicted, cut it and it seems to operate perfectly on 60 m. I checked it b4 I did a processor reset and it seems to be just fine. Is th
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00686.html (9,417 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] OUT OF HAM BAND MODIFICATION (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 12:14:43 -0500
Folks, Sorry to say the chart formatting was lost in transition. Here it is, hopefully readable. BTW, I put the appropriate offset channels in memory to make sure I end up in the right place, per the
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00691.html (9,844 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Out of ham band modification (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 21:01:18 -0500
Thanks Vic, yes Harry Vic has covered it nicely. The only problem with this arrangement is that in memory tune mode the RIT doesn't work. You need to pop out of MT and use the RIT, or manual tuning,
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00777.html (9,398 bytes)

6. Re: [TenTec] Centaur with Paragon (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 09:09:23 -0500
Jerry, I've been using the pair that way for a couple of years and it works great, very smooth break-in, etc. Once you get used to the fan noise it's a fine set-up. http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00883.html (8,909 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] New Rig Suggestion (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:23:23 -0500
Mark, You have a great list of features, but I think it would be tough to deliver at that price. The closest I've seen is the IC-718 that I bought for my YL (W1NCY) when she got her General license a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00376.html (11,656 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:23:43 -0500
Do they still sell them? I looked today to get the details so I could model them, and couldn't find them on their web site?? 73, Joel, W1ZR Stuart Rohre wrote: I agree with Al, Vee beams in general t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00388.html (8,568 bytes)

9. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:58:31 -0500
Keep in mind that the ground for these resistors doesn't have to be anywhere near as good as for a ground plane, for example. In that case a few ohms of resistance reduces your efficiency . In this c
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00466.html (10,874 bytes)

10. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Vee Beam? (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:15:50 -0500
Of course I meant to say "1/4 wave vertical fed against ground", not "ground plane", which neatly sidesteps the ground loss problem as far as feed efficiency is concerned. BTW, neither that, nor " ve
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00467.html (11,512 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] 110 vs 240 (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 10:48:31 -0500
Josh, Can you please provide the details on the quieter fan? I'd also be interested in the results you've obtained with the 572s. I've seen conflicting stories regarding the benefits and am still run
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00223.html (9,910 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] Omni vi plus input audio feed for psk (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 07:35:09 -0400
Bob, You may be very lucky! With my Paragon (line out) to sound card input I had a very loud hum on SSB xmit (I know that's the other side <g>), even when the computer was off. In my station, I have
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00566.html (17,460 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] COMPUTER_POWER_SUPPLY_HASH (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 12:35:39 -0400
George, Check out the Nov/Dec 04 issue of QEX (from ARRL). There is an article about converting ATX supplies to amateur use, but the article includes a descripton of the original design and many of t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00328.html (8,608 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] magic wire antennas (score: 1)
Author: "jrhallas@optonline.net" <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 14:41:18 -0400
Curt, I am happy to share my opinion about the B&W "folded dipole". I have modeled one and think I remember that it is down about 10 dB compared to a resonant dipole, at least on the frequencies I lo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00205.html (10,823 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] Corsair vs. Orion (weak signal) (score: 1)
Author: "jrhallas@optonline.net" <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 09:28:25 -0400
Robert, Your points are well documented and certainly true, however, they apply to the question of copying a weak signal in the presence of noise or interference. The issue with the third order IMD (
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00028.html (10,561 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] New Vector Antenna Analyzer - N5EG design by Tentec (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 08:32:37 -0400
Henrik, This is exactly the same unit that was decribed in detail in the Jul/Aug 2004 issue of QEX. If you don't get QEX, reprints are available from reprints@arrl.org. OTOH if you're interested in t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00441.html (8,242 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Openwire fed differently (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 20:54:12 -0400
Well, if one coax is ok, how about 2? You can make a balanced feedline from two coax cables in parallel, with their shields tied together (I suggest at both ends, and they may be grounded if you want
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00026.html (10,121 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] Openwire fed differently (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:58:23 -0400
Actually, the loss is the same as for a single coax. The power is split between the two and each half power part has a single coax loss. When you combine them back, it's the same loss as in a single
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00047.html (14,616 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Window line (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2005 20:50:39 -0400
Dean, OTOH at 30 MHz, with 300 ft of RG-213, TLW predicts 3.556 dB loss to a 50-ohm load, resulting on 661 W to the load! Time to think of something else <g>! 73, Joel Hallas, W1ZR (frequent TLW user
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-10/msg00159.html (7,856 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] jupiter replies (score: 1)
Author: joel hallas <jrhallas@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 15:15:58 -0500
The Corsair is a fine radio, except it is very limited in split freq operation (+/- about 2 kHz with RIT, as I remember) without the hard to find external VFO. The Omni V (and VI) have built in dual
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00016.html (11,719 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]
This search system is powered by Namazu