Mail Archive Search: <+from:jmalloy@stny.rr.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:jmalloy@stny.rr.com: 94 ]

Total 94 documents matching your query.

81. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter Microphone? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2002 22:14:49 -0400; Nope, it doesn't with a mike. It's a good radio nonetheless... 73, Joe, W2RBA; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00093.html (8,058 bytes)
82. RE: [TenTec] Argonaut V for Oct. 15th = Yes. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 10:55:46 -0400; I'm not able to buy one now (I'm saving my pennies for the Orion), but that's great news, Scott! May you sell many! 73, Joe, W2RBA; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00267.html (8,155 bytes)
83. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter newbie question. (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 16:13:34 -0400; Rich, to adjust the receiver filters, use the "bandwidth" knob; it'll adjust from 8 Khz wide to something like 300 Hz (well, so it says, they are rather wide filters skirts); to adjust the transmitte; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00319.html (7,975 bytes)
84. RE: [TenTec] Re: Keep it on the Listserve (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:08:41 -0400; It's not a matter of spam and virii making to the list but the spam and virii that make to the individual's personal mailbox. I signed up with Yahoo sometime in the last year or two and promptly proc; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00379.html (11,527 bytes)
85. RE: [TenTec] #309 mobile bracket (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 15:28:20 -0500; I don't see information about Ten-Tec products presented by anyone, Ten-Tec or otherwise, in a relatively terse format, as it was, as spam, so I hope Ten-Tec (and Scott, in particular) doesn't hesita; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-10/msg00610.html (9,496 bytes)
86. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter Issue (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 21 Sep 2002 11:25:30 -0400; Methinks you have some RF floating around the shack -- I can duplicate that sort of behavior on 15 meters or higher frequencies when I don't have the rig properly grounded. The Jupiter's control is v; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-09/msg00390.html (7,869 bytes)
87. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter firmware 1.22 available on website (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 19:14:21 -0400; Well, you're right, mine is gone as well. I guess I spoke too soon -- but it's not a show stopper, that's for sure, since I don't generally use the sweep function. Oh well, look for version 1.23 at a; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-08/msg00515.html (8,696 bytes)
88. RE: [TenTec] Ham-Com & Ten-Tec (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Jun 2002 17:54:07 -0400; Eric, the tuning rate on the Jupiter is adjustable from 1 Hz (where one spin of the dial takes you about 120 Hz from the frequency and the last 2 numbers are a blur while spinning the knob) to 100K (; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00096.html (9,758 bytes)
89. RE: [TenTec] jupiter bashing (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2002 09:18:53 -0400; Hello all: Well, look at it this way: at least Americans aren't so closed-minded vis-a-vis foreign made goods that they won't bash a well-made American product! I must admit, however, I don't particu; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00130.html (8,553 bytes)
90. RE: [TenTec] RAER RX-10 RECEIVER FS (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:32:56 -0400; Glenn, you're not likening Ten-Tec to *cockroaches,* are you? Or that cockroaches exist because of marketing? :) You're quite right: somebody should write a book about Ten-Tec. I'd be willing to do i; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00331.html (9,084 bytes)
91. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter QSK (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 08:33:14 -0400; Hi, Tim, I just turned my Jupiter on and sent a few characters to see if I could identify what you called a "squelch tail" but I couldn't. I have a Triton IV, Argonaut 509, Century 21 and Corsair and; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-06/msg00370.html (8,671 bytes)
92. RE: [TenTec] Like New Centurion FS (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 18:30:31 -0400; Hi, Rob, I don't know if it's a good deal, though I've ordered one (guess the deal was good enough to tempt me!) but what "irks" me the most is the size of the thing. Now, I realize that you have has; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00233.html (8,185 bytes)
93. RE: [TenTec] Results: Pegasus & Tuner Query (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 27 May 2002 17:16:34 -0400; Huh? What was poor about it? Mine went in easily and seems well constructed. What does this mean? My internal SWR varies somewhat with the tuner in, perhaps that's what's meant, but it doesn't strik; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-05/msg00577.html (8,933 bytes)
94. RE: [TenTec] Jupiter taking a beating? (score: 1): Author: "Joe Malloy" <jmalloy@stny.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 07:50:58 -0400; I know what you mean, Brian, if I didn't have a Jupiter already (for the better part of a year), I'd wonder whether or not I should buy one. I especially liked the "review" of it that some fellow mad; /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00698.html (10,118 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 94
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]