Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jh.graves@verizon.net: 211 ]

Total 211 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec market visibility (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 10:49:43 -0400
Rick, Oh...I see...All CAPS is not yelling....It is SPEAKING LOUDLY IS FOR THOSE OF US WITH A HEARING DEFICIT SO WE ALL CAN CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION! THANK YOU FOR CLARIFYING IT. John / WA1JG That i
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00001.html (13,142 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec market visibility (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 12:21:04 -0400
Rick, You are right, and I was "hopefully" not mean spirited but I am capable of being smart. If you are my age, you remember that the teachers would remind us...."Don't you be so smart, young man."
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-09/msg00005.html (15,761 bytes)

23. [TenTec] Omni What? (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 16:41:30 -0400
All right...Now I am confused. How can I tell which Omni I have? It is a 546 if I believe the serial number It has the Electronic Display (when it works, sometimes I lose the kilo hz digits, although
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00220.html (9,464 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] Available FOR SALE - T-T #538-AT blue screen. (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 10:37:37 -0400
Al, Unless I really get lucky, it looks like I will not get to Boothbay this year. Are you coming to Boxboro? If so, It would be nice to have cup of whatever with you. John / WA1JG 0915 EDT 13 August
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00272.html (9,605 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec market visibility (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:09:38 -0400
The attendance was good and the forums interesting. Having half the exhibit hall empty and about the same for Flea Market doesn't bode well however. John / WA1JG Ten-Tec was conspicuously absent. Wit
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-08/msg00317.html (10,463 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] Just an observation, Field Day in Hawaii (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 01 Jul 2012 17:10:54 -0400
Rick, I built the 3A and still have it. I probably ought to go through it again. Who knows what shape some of those caps are? One of those things in the garage I have trouble removing. John / WA1JG O
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00019.html (11,714 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] My first Ten Tec (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2012 12:57:42 -0400
Well, I haven't seen any mention of this one. but my first TenTec was a borrowed Argonaut. Having been inoculated, when I found a TT TX-100 transmitter in a ham store in southeastern Pennsylvania, I
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00162.html (8,255 bytes)

28. [TenTec] Omni-C Display problem (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:55:52 -0400
My Omni-C has started showing a display error that effects only the display. On 20 M, the display is exactly 8 Mhz low. The same is true for 15 and 10 Meters as well. There are other errors below 20
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00189.html (7,483 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Jupiter CAT question (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 15:03:29 -0400
Carl, Does this mean that when bits bite you, you need to get catty? 49, John / WA1JG I hope this helps. Carl Moreschi N4PY 121 Little Bell Dr. Hays, NC 28635 www.n4py.com On 7/13/2012 1:40 PM, Marti
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00292.html (10,057 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] OT: Field Day Drill (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2012 19:05:16 -0400
Stuart, Funny you should mention Bandpass filters at FD. The NSRA FD Committee, with a little urging from a few members pointed out that the the Radio Club membership on average and in fact was not g
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00418.html (12,337 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] OT: Field Day Drill (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 11:30:43 -0400
Stuart, It sounds like we have similar stories here. For better or worse (at least for now) we are using 4 sections Rohn 25 for our tower. When we were doing 3 or 4 of these, we acquired tilting base
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-07/msg00427.html (12,724 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Omni d series c knob needed (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 00:34:41 -0400
Mike, Are you running out of projects? I have purchased replacement knobs from TT for my Omni-C. My thought has been to create a screen, maybe with very wide masking tape and painting the newer knob
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-06/msg00052.html (8,155 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] Top receivers (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 15:41:22 -0400
As an aside, "RTFM" still is a VERY GOOD idea. Seriously, I have learned as much by listening to how others are doing things or looking over the shoulder of an operator who is getting it done, but we
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00120.html (12,257 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] RFI Issues (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 11:31:53 -0400
Bob, Aside from 1/2 wave verticals (or vertical end fed dipoles if you will) not needing radials as they are as complete as a horizontal dipole also, with a 1/4 wave vertical, is it not sufficient to
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00205.html (13,828 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:56:53 -0400
Stuart, Having had this discussion before, I would remind people that N6LF was working with 1/4 wave verticals not 1/2 Wave ones. !/2 Wave verticals don't work with radials. Also, although I am not s
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00220.html (10,439 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] Radial Research (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 18:06:44 -0400
73 John / WA1JG 73 Rick, DJ0IP Stuart, Having had this discussion before, I would remind people that N6LF was working with 1/4 wave verticals not 1/2 Wave ones. !/2 Wave verticals don't work with rad
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00225.html (12,156 bytes)

37. [TenTec] Radial Research - Dipoles & Verticals. (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 16:41:26 -0400
At the risk of again placing my foot on top of my tongue, I think it bears mentioning that one of the hidden issues in this discussion is what radiation do you want or need. The radiation pattern of
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00263.html (8,577 bytes)

38. Re: [TenTec] gas on the fire (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 17:56:04 -0400
My experience is as a self taught student still learning about how the NEC models work and I am also trying to move from EXNEC to 4NEC2. What I am really trying to say here is that if someone else se
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-05/msg00283.html (11,418 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Using an Argosy in the field (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2012 18:03:27 -0400
John, My current plan is to build a vertical that can collapse into short sections. It is a design by Phil Salas - AD5X and uses a 10 ft telescoping whip at the top and covers 60-10 meters, without a
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00016.html (11,809 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Using an Argosy in the field (score: 1)
Author: John <jh.graves@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2012 12:09:12 -0400
Rick, You found it. And yes, I do understand that it will be barely functional at 60 M. It does give me 10, 15, and 20 M so that would be nice break in the driving. The antenna only needs the coil fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2012-04/msg00022.html (17,305 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu