Mail Archive Search: <+from:gjn@mail.image.dk>

Results:

References: [ +from:gjn@mail.image.dk: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 705 mic (score: 1): Author: gjn@mail.image.dk (gjn); Date: Fri, 10 Dec 99 17:18:05 +0100; I have an OMNI VI+ and a 705 microphone driving it without a battery, although one can be installed. - Works beautifully after I increased the gain by increasing R1 (47 k) by putting 220 k in series.; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00174.html (7,064 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Centurion start-up time (score: 1): Author: gjn@mail.image.dk (gjn); Date: Sun, 12 Dec 99 10:18:22 +0100; When participating in the Danish morning club at 3714 kHz it is often necessary to use QRO with my Centurion, and it is naturally tuned to max. as is the 238 tuner. In between my turns I turn off the; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00203.html (7,059 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Signal reporting (score: 1): Author: gjn@mail.image.dk (gjn); Date: Thu, 18 Nov 99 23:43:15 +0100; and try to increase to 30-35 wpm. If I get 228 I know that I will not have a chance to be read unless I reduce the speed considerably. (Sorry not to keep to TT technicalities, but I run TT eq.) 73 -; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00342.html (12,291 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Omni Vi freq drift and poor keyer? (score: 1): Author: gjn@mail.image.dk (gjn); Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 07:54:17 +0200; My OMNI 6+ will drift a little when I start the power supply as I switch it on. If the 13VDC is applied a couple of minutes before I switch the OMNI 6+ on, there is no drift, as the TCXO is DC suppli; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00199.html (9,904 bytes)
5. [TenTec] super cmos II keyer problem (score: 1): Author: gjn@mail.image.dk (gjn); Date: Sun, 13 Jun 1999 08:12:51 +0200; I had the same problem when I hadn't used my CMOS Superkeyer III for a couple of years, and had lost the manual. I contacted Idiom Press and got a new manual and plenty advice for free. You can find; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00159.html (6,948 bytes)
6. [TenTec] TT INRAD Filters (score: 1): Author: gjn@mail.image.dk (gjn); Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 20:09:04 +0200; Hi Jim, You have obviously substituted the TT filter #282 with an INRAD #751 in your OMNI VI+. What changes in CW reception performance did you notice? Easier tuning? Less ringing? Easier readability; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00203.html (7,546 bytes)
7. [TenTec] TT INRAD Filters (score: 1): Author: gjn@mail.image.dk (gjn); Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 20:09:27 +0200; Hi Jim, You have obviously substituted the TT filter #282 with an INRAD #751 in your OMNI VI+. What changes in CW reception performance did you notice? Easier tuning? Less ringing? Easier readability; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00204.html (7,511 bytes)
8. [TenTec] WTB: filters model 217 and 219 (score: 1): Author: gjn@mail.image.dk (gjn); Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 11:42:07 +0200; Want to buy 9 MHz filters model 217 and 219 for my OMNI VI+ or equivalent InRad. Please quote to my email address: gjn@image.dk 73 - Gunner/OZ6NF Gunner Juul-Nyholm Maglegaards Allé 93 B DK-28; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00267.html (6,821 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Operating CW (score: 1): Author: gjn@mail.image.dk (gjn); Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 22:24:10 +0200; When I learned the code towards the Danish 12 wpm test, I barely passed (11 wpm OK, 12 no). The test was of course with a hand key. The licence arrived a few days after, and I went on air on 80m, but; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00262.html (8,108 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]