Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ghoffman@spacetech.com: 567 ]

Total 567 documents matching your query.

341. Re: [TenTec] Fw: Your semi-annual Astron tip... (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:09:30 -0500
I remember seeing this before a couple of times, but thank you for reminding us all of it. I feel this reminder was most timely. I dare say other models of power supply might benefit from the same mo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00592.html (11,577 bytes)

342. Re: [TenTec] Station and AC Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:16:04 -0500
Well....yes and no. Yes, a circuit exists through your radio gear that ties the two grounds together. Depending on the equipment, it might even be a pretty good connection, although not at RF. But if
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00593.html (10,321 bytes)

343. Re: [TenTec] Station and AC Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:28:38 -0500
Although I don't know if my system, or anyone's system could really take the full brunt of a direct strike (although I know several have claimed so), I do agree that even a few tenth's of an ohm of r
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00594.html (12,226 bytes)

344. Re: [TenTec] Station and AC Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 16:37:44 -0500
Or....a half wave ground wire, to repeat the low impedance at earth right at the radio. And, since lightning is RF, I feel that a real RF ground is important, even for lightning. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00595.html (9,652 bytes)

345. Re: [TenTec] Station and AC Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:32:13 -0500
Well.....If I had appreciable amounts of RF on the outside of my coax, which I don't due to the heavy chokes I use at the ends, then I can imagine a path for RF to flow from my power amplifier into t
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00641.html (10,753 bytes)

346. Re: [TenTec] Fw: Your semi-annual Astron tip... (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:37:55 -0500
Excellent point ! should something 24 connection
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00642.html (9,889 bytes)

347. Re: [TenTec] Station and AC Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:56:58 -0500
See my other reply on this subject. No source, in my setup, for any appreciable current to flow on this ground path. No more than there normally is on anyone's ground path. Of course, as has been wri
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00643.html (9,843 bytes)

348. Re: [TenTec] Station and AC Ground (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 18:01:48 -0500
station the close But, as you also said, there should be no current in it. I don't advocate using the half wave ground in a vacuum, that is, without taking the other necessary steps also. You must ch
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-11/msg00644.html (10,405 bytes)

349. Re: [TenTec] Whirlpool Duet, Neptune, Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 22:32:02 -0400
Hehehehee.....I think that "put in a load" meant he did a load of wash....not inserted a dummy load in the antenna line. Of course I could be wrong. 73 de Gary. AA2IZ fact That's a The ham RF to comp
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00409.html (12,314 bytes)

350. Re: [TenTec] This is War! (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:10:14 -0400
Jim, Thank you for informing me. I will avoid the use of the "c" word in future. Of course I have seen far worse on the list, but I assume all those folks were placed on moderated status as well. I s
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-09/msg00435.html (30,119 bytes)

351. Re: [TenTec] radar (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 15:31:36 -0400
Fascinating. Can you elaborate on this calibration method. Its nothing I had ever heard about before. Thanks. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00057.html (10,307 bytes)

352. Re: [TenTec] was - "Radiates like Crazy"???? No (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 15:24:07 -0400
I also use the 135 ft Dipole fed with ladder line. It gives me just excellent results. I use other antennas and feedlines as well, and my experience has been that with a proper setup of the entire st
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00263.html (14,398 bytes)

353. Re: [TenTec] "Radiates like Crazy"???? No (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 21:20:29 -0400
Well, Bob has it in a nutshell. If everything is balanced, then basic physics rules, as always, and the equal and opposite fields set up by the equal and opposite currents in the feeder will cancel a
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00300.html (25,241 bytes)

354. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu FT9000 oversights in QST review (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2005 22:31:08 -0400
Of course, one must not forget that, feedline notwithstanding, the antenna Does radiate (we all hope). So I guess maybe 5kw 5 feet away from anything whatsoever might be a problem. Now on the other h
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00305.html (19,103 bytes)

355. Re: [TenTec] "Radiates like Crazy"???? No (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2005 21:07:35 -0400
That's right. I mentioned that in another post. So did at least one other person. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ points the in
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00329.html (11,081 bytes)

356. Re: [TenTec] vertical dipoles (score: 1)
Author: "gary" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:55:44 -0400
One certainly needs a tuner if one is going to connect the 50 ohm output of a modern solid state rig to the high impedance at the end of a half wave antenna. Of course this is done all the time. I re
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00378.html (11,099 bytes)

357. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits" (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 20:56:05 -0400
Me too. I still have a multi-band vertical up, but of course its not a half wave dipole. Even so, it compares reasonably well with my beam. (That is, the beam is better, but not by an overwhelming ma
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00409.html (16,647 bytes)

358. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits" (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:44:37 -0400
Ok, lets get this straight before I get confused again :) :) I got out my Carr Lane book of "Handy Multipliers and Trigonometry Tables for Engineers" which my Dad gave me back in 1968. It lists the c
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00426.html (18,146 bytes)

359. Re: [TenTec] Vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:55:37 -0400
Yes indeed. Or one could go back and speak to Mr. Marconi himself, for whom the vertical antenna bearing his name was of course, well, er, named. :) Your point (and others) being that the vertical an
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00427.html (8,645 bytes)

360. Re: [TenTec] Vertical Dipole "Fringe Benefits" (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:57:44 -0400
OK, now that I wrote this I see that the issue had already been corrected and set to rest. I did not mean to beat a dead horse and apologize for having said it yet again, after it was already settled
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00428.html (20,076 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu