Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ghoffman@spacetech.com: 567 ]

Total 567 documents matching your query.

241. Re: [TenTec] Orion RF issue (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2007 17:22:37 -0500
Right you are, Ron. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ With lightning, you'll never create a true "no voltage" situation between any two points, but you can reduce the voltage differential to the point that it will p
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00012.html (15,228 bytes)

242. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 50, Issue 27 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 20:32:40 -0500
Doing things the old way is fine. I'm not attacking that. Please continue. However, as we all know, the hobby is rapidly declining in terms of numbers of active Hams, and the age is rapidly increasin
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-02/msg00420.html (11,323 bytes)

243. Re: [TenTec] Class A (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:30:31 -0500
Perhaps, perhaps....but how does this relate to Ten-Tec radio equipment ? 73 de Gary, AA2IZ quality activity are folks who do not have a good healthy who was into ESSB etc who was a CW operator? this
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00124.html (9,005 bytes)

244. Re: [TenTec] Does anyone have a schematic for: (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:42:44 -0500
Room for all the modes and tastes ? Ridiculous ! 73 de Gary, AA2IZ a Maybe
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00239.html (8,198 bytes)

245. Re: [TenTec] grounding (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:52:23 -0500
Let's say for sake of discussion that you have a shack position close enough to physical earth (and your array of ground rods and buried wire) that you can have an excellent, much less than 1/4 wave
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00240.html (10,329 bytes)

246. Re: [TenTec] grounding (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:58:33 -0500
Unless there is a problem elsewhere in the system, your earth ground should not be carrying "significant RF currents". If it were, then your energy intended for transmission would be heading to groun
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00242.html (11,199 bytes)

247. Re: [TenTec] grounding (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 20:38:12 -0500
Right....the short wire, the one that is of zero impedance, may carry some current. This will NOT be an appreciable current since the station is properly designed. (Mainly an issue of balance.) Thus
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00268.html (13,365 bytes)

248. Re: [TenTec] Orion 11 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:48:40 -0500
First you have to hear him. The antenna helps that a lot ! Then a better receiver. Next he has to hear you. The antenna helps a lot ! Then maybe an amp. Bottom line ? Antenna, Antenna, maybe hotter r
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00342.html (9,096 bytes)

249. Re: [TenTec] Orion 11 (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 16:40:26 -0500
Indeed yes. I'd buy a lot less radio...maybe even a Corsair II and by all means spend the rest of the money on antennas. Perhaps an older amp also. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ you have
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00343.html (9,301 bytes)

250. Re: [TenTec] code speed (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 20:34:07 -0500
Isn't it just amazing that in the middle of a world war, someone could bother to be upset by "4Q" ? Maybe in between machine gunning people and dropping bombs on them ? Sheesh. 73 de Gary, AA2IZ
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00418.html (10,554 bytes)

251. Re: [TenTec] Code Speed (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:05:44 -0500
Time to upgrade :)
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00480.html (10,499 bytes)

252. Re: [TenTec] Code Speed (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 17:33:12 -0500
Its true. You can copy CW in the worst of conditions. Next come the narrow digital modes. Then the wider digital modes. Finally SSB. It all depends on what you want to do and when and where you want
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00484.html (10,011 bytes)

253. Re: [TenTec] Code Speed (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:23:34 -0500
Hehehehe....I wanted to say that but I was a chicken ! <<grin>>
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00495.html (10,489 bytes)

254. Re: [TenTec] Orion I and II on Ebay (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 18:50:29 -0500
I agree...no need to leave for a tiny slip-up. Ebay. you [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] wrote:
/archives//html/TenTec/2007-01/msg00592.html (12,154 bytes)

255. Re: [TenTec] Noise Reduction Setting (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 00:31:52 -0500
My two and a half cents worth.... I cannot comment on ALL the posts on this subject. People have widely divergent views on the effectiveness of the noise reduction software now (or previously) presen
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00088.html (17,712 bytes)

256. Re: [TenTec] Noise Reduction Setting (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 22:38:21 -0500
That's all correct. Perhaps my choice of words was unfortunate. I did not say it produced any more GAIN. Rather I said that the DSP action resulted in more gains (in the war against noise....that is.
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00124.html (12,020 bytes)

257. Re: [TenTec] Noise Reduction Setting (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 22:47:25 -0500
I'm not familiar with Linrad, so on that I cannot comment. DSP work is not done with general purpose microcomputers running the huge overhead of an operating system and everything else. I can well be
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00125.html (12,152 bytes)

258. Re: [TenTec] Noise Reduction Setting (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2006 23:31:29 -0500
Bill, One thing is for sure. IF...IF.....all that the processor in the Orion does is build a narrower bandwidth filter around the signal, then it follows as the night follows the day that a person do
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00127.html (12,482 bytes)

259. Re: [TenTec] Noise Reduction Setting (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 00:35:57 -0500
Ok Grant.... I'm not trying to split hairs with you or be blindly argumentative....however, a DSP processor does nothing else, by the definition of the term. If it is a general purpose processor, cap
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00129.html (12,898 bytes)

260. Re: [TenTec] Noise Reduction Setting (score: 1)
Author: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2006 01:18:56 -0500
Duane, Oh yes indeed there are. I've used many forms of Digital Signal Processing in my earlier work, other than for noise reduction. I am though limiting the discussion HERE to noise reduction, beca
/archives//html/TenTec/2006-12/msg00132.html (17,194 bytes)

Current List: 241 - 260
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu