- 1. Re: [TenTec] O3 wish list (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:50:04 -0400
- I'm new to the Orion II, having owned it for just a month now. Over the years, I've owned most of the better transceivers and have been using a panadaptor of one sort or another since the Icom 781. I
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00070.html (12,119 bytes)
- 2. [TenTec] Orion II & P3? (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 14:29:59 -0400
- Any Orion II owner using it with an Elecraft P3? I believe the P3 can be setup to handle the 9 MHz IF of the Orion. That would leave the frequency control. I don't know how the P3 to K3 interface fun
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00077.html (6,883 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TenTec] O3 wish list (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 14:52:13 -0400
- Haven't tried the Flex-1500, but have used an SDR-IQ that way with my Yaesu FT-1000MP Mark V. Fed the SDR-IQ the same signal that went to the Mk V receive antenna input using a hybrid splitter. The s
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00078.html (13,961 bytes)
- 4. Re: [TenTec] O3 wish list (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 20:14:13 -0400
- Understood. That's the way I used Commander with the SDR-IQ and Mark V and the control was flawless. However, that's NOT the way things work with the Orion and Commander. Commander and N4PY exchange
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-05/msg00082.html (18,555 bytes)
- 5. [TenTec] Yaesu 50 MHz transverter with Orion? (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:15:48 -0400
- Has anyone here used the Yaesu FTV-1000 transverter with an Orion? I see the Orion II transverter output level is a bit high compared to the transverter input spec. Any other concerns? K8AC _________
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00000.html (7,182 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TenTec] Yaesu 50 MHz transverter with Orion? (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 19:36:42 -0400
- True, but the Orion II manual says that you can adjust the output to the transverter only from +5 to +15 dBm, and the FTV-1000 needs only -13 dBm for full output. The Yaesu transverter may operate a
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-06/msg00002.html (8,806 bytes)
- 7. Re: [TenTec] pan adapter (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 19:34:44 -0400
- I installed the IF tap in my Orion II and use it with an SDR-IQ and Spectravue. With the recent improvements to Spectravue to support the Orion II, I believe that it's a superior solution to the pana
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00109.html (7,907 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TenTec] OK , sounds good (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:46:48 -0400
- There are a couple of approaches, both of which work. I first used the N4PY software along with LP-Pan and PowerSDR/IF. I ended up using an SDR-IQ receiver and Spectravue software, along with VSPE fo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00114.html (10,247 bytes)
- 9. Re: [TenTec] OK , sounds good (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:22:26 -0400
- A comment on sharing the antenna with the SDR-IQ: I did that with my FT-1000MP Mk V some time back and found that I got some hash on 20M fed back from the SDR-IQ to the Mk V receive input. It that ap
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00116.html (8,321 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TenTec] Orion 565 Key clicks (Karl Seper) (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:46:27 -0400
- I've worked on a couple of non-Ten Tec rigs to eliminate or reduce the key click problem. Forget about the unmodulated noise you're hearing for now - perhaps just phase noise on the signal. If you ha
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-07/msg00156.html (10,873 bytes)
- 11. Re: [TenTec] What Radio? (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 08:29:22 -0400
- Stuart - Forgive me for venting on this subject, but Rob Sherwood's chart is perhaps the most misunderstood piece of information in ham radio today. It is not, and was never intended to be, a grading
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-08/msg00193.html (11,902 bytes)
- 12. Re: [TenTec] Question (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:44:33 -0400
- I wouldn't call any of the panadaptor approaches "plug and play", but it does work just fine. You will of course need the IF tap on the Orion II and that's well documented. Currently, I'm using Spect
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00065.html (8,492 bytes)
- 13. Re: [TenTec] Question (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:28:09 -0400
- There are a few problems with that approach - here are some of them: 1. The sensitivity of the SDR-IQ doesn't approach that of the Orion II on 12 and 10 meters - I judge it to be deficient in that ke
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00068.html (12,209 bytes)
- 14. Re: [TenTec] Question (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 07:58:42 -0400
- No - the VFO-B frequency is not shown. If enough folks ask Moe to add that feature, maybe it will happen. Over time, I've decided that showing the VFO-B position on the trace is less important that I
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00080.html (8,691 bytes)
- 15. Re: [TenTec] Question (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 14:41:34 -0400
- Yes - using the ExtRadio option you mentioned. DXLab Commander specifies the Orion on the same COM port number and the port sharing is handled transparently by a program called VSPE. 73, Floyd ______
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-10/msg00091.html (10,416 bytes)
- 16. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+, VII, or Orion for next rig. Can't decide (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 08:40:25 -0500
- If I may jump in for a moment - I think you're very close to reality here. But, given a reasonably efficient set of antennas, the overwhelming factor that hasn't been mentioned is the skill and exper
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00101.html (12,873 bytes)
- 17. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+, VII, or Orion for next rig. Can't decide (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 17:55:50 -0500
- A couple more comments regarding receiver evaluation. There's interesting info at W8JI's site here: http://www.w8ji.com/receiver%20IM3%20sorted.htm . Note his comment about an IM3 DR of greater than
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00124.html (12,052 bytes)
- 18. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 19:11:45 -0500
- An interesting question. I wonder if the Orion and Orion 2 differ in this respect. On my Orion 2, I can use the CW delay to achieve semi-break-in, but I still hear the same relay clacking away. I exp
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00137.html (11,339 bytes)
- 19. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:03:25 -0500
- Indeed there is. But, on my Orion 2, even setting that to 100% results in still hearing a relay operate on every dot and dash. The issue isn't with implementing a delay or hold in keying the rig or e
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00149.html (19,877 bytes)
- 20. Re: [TenTec] Orion's break in (score: 1)
- Author: Floyd Sense <floyd@k8ac.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 08:32:31 -0500
- I delayed both - no difference. K8AC _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2011-11/msg00153.html (10,081 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu