Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:finger@goeaston.net: 86 ]

Total 86 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [Orion] Inrad 762 and PBT - A unique and powerful combination (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 08:05:17 -0400
Bill: First congratulations on your one year anniversary! And, as I have said privately thank you for sharing your experiences and observations with the Orion group. You have been more help than you
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00899.html (8,382 bytes)

22. [TenTec] Fw: 762 filter (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 11:49:57 -0400
I received this message from George at Inrad this am. This speaks volumes for Inrad customer service. I was not even going to question their accuracy. Someone else from this reflector did so on my be
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00904.html (6,790 bytes)

23. [TenTec] HAPPY ORION OWNER (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 12:24:02 -0400
Count me as one of the happy Orion owners. No high speed qsk (I stay below 40 wpm), no amp interface problems (I use the ptt/vox lines on my TT 425 and Alpha 78). One reset during the last month (whi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00188.html (7,319 bytes)

24. [TenTec] you never really know (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:16:21 -0400
Jim: All the best. I had similar work done a bit over two years ago. Never felt better than I do now. You have had your "event". Now do what they tell you to do. Will keep fingers crossed. Let us kno
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00589.html (7,020 bytes)

25. [TenTec] tuner for sale (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:44:59 -0400
Hi all: I assist widows liquidate their husbands ham radio treasures. I have for immediate sale a nice Ten Tec 4229 tuner. Functionally complete, a few scratches here and there on the case. It is a b
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00609.html (6,611 bytes)

26. [TenTec] Orion flawless (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 20:29:11 -0500
Hi all: After 24.9 hours of operation in cq ww ssb I can report that my Orion with 1.372 was flawless. No hiccups nor resets were encountered nor required. Radio remained powered up for over 48 hours
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00402.html (7,190 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Orion flawless (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 06:45:12 -0500
OOOOOps. I meant 1.371. I am not a beta tester. Have no idea when it will show up. Sorry for the confusion. 73 bob de w9ge -- Original Message -- From: "Sergei Kulyov" <ua3ap@mail.ru> To: <finger@goe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00003.html (7,814 bytes)

28. [TenTec] true qsk (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 09:22:55 -0500
I too want to publicly thank Doug for his story of shipboard cw operation. I sent him a private e-mail of thanks b4 seeing others do so here. It was an excellent story that I thoroughly enjoyed. The
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00280.html (6,997 bytes)

29. [TenTec] Orion mic input question (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 13:09:42 -0500
I have finally, after a year, hooked up my scope to the rf chain from my Ten Tec Orion. It appears the mic gain setting has no affect after turning it past "15". I have been running my Heil HC4 eleme
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00510.html (7,721 bytes)

30. [TenTec] orion mic woes (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 12:37:10 -0500
N1MM brings up a good point. I run mic gain on my Orion at about 65 with an HC4 element, but truth be told I see no difference in output on a scope when mic gain is set anywhere between about 20 and
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00468.html (6,950 bytes)

31. [TenTec] Re: TenTec Digest, Vol 24, Issue 68 (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:03:02 -0500
Hank: The 422 Centurian is one of the best buys in the amp world. Tunes very easily, reliable, looks good, is quiet and just works. On cw it will be hard to tell the difference between 422 and the ot
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg00724.html (45,027 bytes)

32. [TenTec] challenge (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 12:44:47 -0500
Anyone is welcome to try my Orion and several have. However, I would much prefer that folks do not rush out and buy one, as it will keep the competition to the point where I will continue have an adv
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01048.html (6,954 bytes)

33. [TenTec] keying loops (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:32:07 -0500
Grant and all: Not sure that I am the originator but my suggestion back channel to Tommy was that I had a similar amp keying problem and found that both keying loops had to be set the same for anythi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01114.html (7,448 bytes)

34. [TenTec] Re: keying loops (score: 1)
Author: "w9ge" <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 14:28:32 -0500
Perhaps I had better explain things a bit more. I had a series of problems in Jan/Feb of 2004 with my Orion. Both of my amps had to be configured with PTT for them to work. Then things got progressiv
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-12/msg01118.html (8,101 bytes)

35. [TenTec] orion operation issues (score: 1)
Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2005 12:27:21 -0500
Yes, a book on how to operate would be nice for new hams but how to make it inclusive for the Orion would be a difficult task. I had a new ham in the shack yesterday and spent a few minutes showing h
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-01/msg00545.html (7,328 bytes)

36. [TenTec] cw overshoot (score: 1)
Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:45:45 -0500
Mark: My Orion does this as well if running at about 100 watts. Ignore the meter pinning; it was much worse in earlier firmware. What is important is the power overshooot on the first couple of chara
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-02/msg00797.html (7,628 bytes)

37. [TenTec] tuning steps (score: 1)
Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2005 05:51:20 -0500
In case TT is watching.....I vote for NO CHANGE. I leave mine set on 1 and use the X10 when I want to tune faster....if I want to rapidly change I simply type the frequency I want to go to in the cal
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00696.html (6,585 bytes)

38. [TenTec] real cw ops (score: 1)
Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 11:55:12 -0400
Sometimes perceptions change. Very early on in the e-mail cycle of life it was deemed offensive to type all caps if one indeed was not shouting. Kind of like hihihi on cw and has evolved into the smi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00244.html (8,220 bytes)

39. [TenTec] real cw (score: 1)
Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 19:31:03 -0400
Very well said, Tommy. Many do not understand that for a good cw op, it is nothing more than another language. And, as a conversational language what a joy it is. Put the pencil down, sit back and li
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-04/msg00383.html (7,904 bytes)

40. [TenTec] to the moderator (score: 1)
Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:00:41 -0400
Why put the burden on the moderator? It is mostly laziness on the part of posters. I spent about 10 seconds truncating your message above.....it is so simple. Easier than resetting the threshold leve
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00103.html (7,095 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]
This search system is powered by Namazu