Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:farson@shaw.ca: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

61. RE: [TenTec] Corsair II tricks and tips (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 12:10:25 -0700
Hi Don, I can confirm your success with DeOxit. Recently, I applied Caig Labs' DeOxit and ProGold to all internal connector pins in a 20-year-old Cushman CE-31A FM Radio Test Set. This treatment clea
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00076.html (7,509 bytes)

62. RE: [TenTec] It is Back! (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 12 Jul 2003 10:35:21 -0700
Hi Steve, Please try to avoid using pejorative racist terms. They do not enhance a debate. Thanks and 73, Adam, VA7OJ/AB4OJ
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00384.html (6,919 bytes)

63. RE: [TenTec] dbm and VU units of audio measurement (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2003 10:52:24 -0700
Hi Stuart, Not to argue the toss, but... In all my 35 years in the international telecom industry, I never ran across dBmw. All our voice-frequency (VF) level meters were calibrated in dBm. 0 dBm = -
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00745.html (10,517 bytes)

64. RE: [TenTec] dbm and VU units of audio measurement (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 11:46:05 -0700
Hi Stuart, Yes, I know what you meant. It is just that all the years I spent doing standards and compliance engineering in the telecom industry have made me a stickler for correct terminology in unit
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00769.html (10,270 bytes)

65. RE: [TenTec] dbm and VU units of audio measurement (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2003 16:12:24 -0700
Hi Paul, You made an interesting point. A brief Google search did not reveal any specific reference to the historical evolution of power metrology at Bell Labs. I suspect that in the days before trac
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-07/msg00779.html (11,595 bytes)

66. RE: [TenTec] Future TT projects (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 22:26:39 -0700
Hi Bob, <<... what would happen if the core hardware pieces were made available along with source code under modified public license...>> But this leaves unaddressed my questions as to who would deve
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00001.html (8,295 bytes)

67. RE: [TenTec] So *That's* Why They Measure That (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 18:03:42 -0700
Hi Ron, It hurts to admit this, but I believe that in the matter of CW capability we are up against the ugly realities of the marketplace. The amateur segment is only a part of the major Japanese rad
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00128.html (8,598 bytes)

68. RE: [TenTec] A bit tired of the arguments (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 13:35:33 -0700
Hi Ray, That sounds like what happens when I wrestle with Max, my Boxer! Cheers for now, 73, Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-06/msg00839.html (7,204 bytes)

69. RE: [TenTec] Hello Orion Users (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 16:30:24 -0700
Bill, Carl is correct. The 14 kHz analogue IF signal enters the ADC, which converts it into a digital bitstream. The DSP processes this bitstream according to algorithms stored in firmware; one of th
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00100.html (12,410 bytes)

70. RE: [TenTec] Eccentric display? (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 11:29:48 -0700
Paul, Have we not overlooked the diameter, pitch and offset of the case holes? (Memories of S/Line...) Cheers for now, 73, Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ --Original Message-- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [m
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00841.html (10,024 bytes)

71. RE: [TenTec] Virtual, Actual (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2003 10:58:46 -0700
Hi Duane, You have stated it very succinctly; technology, like time, moves on. A couple of sayings come to mind: "In technology, there are but two degrees of freedom; forward and down. There is no ba
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00915.html (8,083 bytes)

72. RE: [TenTec] Pegasus - no ssb output (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2003 15:59:20 -0700
Hi Carl, Just curious - is it possible to unlock that restriction for Canadian and European users? We have no sub-band restrictions by emission type in Canada. For example, I am allowed to operate SS
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg00993.html (9,772 bytes)

73. RE: [TenTec] Future TT projects (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 12:55:14 -0700
A number of general questions arise out of this impressive list of "wish list" items: 1. A substantial engineering team will need to be assembled to develop all these radio models, features etc. RF,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-05/msg01205.html (12,505 bytes)

74. RE: [TenTec] Paddle connector / speaker connector (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2003 22:56:12 -0800
Pete, I just read the warning in the Orion user manual against inserting a mono plug in the headphone jack . Please DO NOT PLUG A MONO PHONE PLUG, (two-circuit) INTO ORION's FRONT PANEL PH JACK.... A
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00030.html (8,916 bytes)

75. RE: [TenTec] Fw : Orion first impressions (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2003 23:43:25 -0700
Grant, << The VBT stuff on Yaecomwoods is second best, at best. >> The Twin Passband Tuning on various Icom transceivers, including the IC-781, IC-756Pro and IC-756Pro2, allows the operator to shift
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00225.html (9,316 bytes)

76. RE: [TenTec] Instant Orion Delivery (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:28:50 -0700
Hi Ron, That joke has earned you a special award. To collect your award certificate, please click this link (guaranteed no viruses, DDoS, malicious scripts or any such rubbish.) http://members.shaw.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00280.html (7,967 bytes)

77. RE: [TenTec] Enhanced SSB and listening fatigue (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 00:08:34 -0700
George, Paul, ITU-R Recommendation M.1173 (technical characteristics of HF-SSB transmitters for the maritime mobile service) is revealing on this point: 3 The transmitter audio-frequency band shall b
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-04/msg00551.html (10,366 bytes)

78. RE: [TenTec] Misc. Orion comments (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 10:46:06 -0800
no....actually HRO's price of $2539 for the 756Pro II (even including the free PS125) is in line with the price I paid for mine at Dayton 2003. Traditionally, Icom start discounting a radio when they
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00407.html (8,539 bytes)

79. RE: [TenTec] "Remember, it's a computer." (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 16:01:21 -0800
Hi Stuart, Sorry - "the old-fashioned way" is no longer cost-effective. Silicon, software and numerically-controlled board build/assembly are so much cheaper these days than gears, slug racks, cams,
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-03/msg00572.html (10,215 bytes)

80. RE: [TenTec] dealer networks: AES NO value added (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 01 Feb 2003 18:04:01 -0800
In defence of AES, I dealt with their Orlando store extensively during my 20-year sojourn in Florida. Grant K4IQW, the manager, always looked after me - I cannot praise him sufficiently. On at least
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-02/msg00033.html (10,154 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu