Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:farson@shaw.ca: 113 ]

Total 113 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TenTec] OT: FCC to re-instate CW requirement for General and Extra (score: 1)
Author: "Adam Farson" <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2014 11:02:50 -0700
As they say in the Middle East, "Boukra fil mishmish!" 73, Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00011.html (6,973 bytes)

2. [TenTec] FS: Ten-Tec Omni VI Station (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:57:47 -0800
The North Shore Amateur Radio Club (NSARC) is offering its Ten-Tec Omni VI station for sale. A complete description, including pricing, is available in PDF format via the Club website. The station wi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-03/msg00366.html (7,255 bytes)

3. RE: [TenTec] OT: On weasels in general (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 10:30:19 -0800
What is wrong with a weasel? It is a specialist predator of small rodents, and also takes small birds and lizards whenever opportunity offers. I would rather have a weasel or two in my back garden th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00511.html (8,545 bytes)

4. RE: [TenTec] Question regarding Omni VI+ on SSB (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 22:01:27 -0800
The ITU-R AF response mask for SSB transmitters in the maritime radio service is 350 to 2700 Hz at the -6 dB points (Recommendation M.1173). That is a good starting point for SSB radiotelephone trans
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00646.html (8,676 bytes)

5. RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec reflector (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:34:06 -0700
Hi Dave, "We"? When I was first licensed in 1962 (as ZS1ZG), I noted that several well-known hams of my acquaintance seemed unable to replace a blown mains fuse in their homes, let alone build a piec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00624.html (8,754 bytes)

6. RE: [TenTec] Basic question - Long (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2004 01:03:08 -0700
Suggestion: Let's start a new mail-list dedicated to computers and OS issues. I already have a name reserved for it: "non.comp.os.mentis" Cheers for now, 73, Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00051.html (9,176 bytes)

7. RE: [TenTec] Orion to IC-2KL & AT-500 Interface (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:14:47 -0700
Hi Bill, The microHam decoder may work in this application. http://www.microham.com There is a more basic problem, though; the Orion lacks an external ALC input. Operation of the IC-2KL without an AL
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00235.html (7,884 bytes)

8. RE: [TenTec] Losing the music - an apropos story (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:20:07 -0700
Guess I was fortunate - my first exposure to music was via live concerts at the Albert Hall in London. I still judge all music systems by the criterion of a live performance. This made the transition
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00236.html (7,166 bytes)

9. RE: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this being covered here? (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:38:55 -0700
Hi Rob, Liked that! But... Concerning the French and music, I used to listen to "La Chaine France-Musique" (a classical-music network similar to some US NPR stations or CBC2) when I lived in Geneva i
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00458.html (8,269 bytes)

10. RE: [TenTec] Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 19:03:11 -0700
Hi Rob, All current solid-state amplifiers use the ALC line as a part of their protective subsystem. If an anomalous operating condition arises, the amplifier will first reduce the drive power by pul
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00854.html (10,250 bytes)

11. RE: [TenTec] Friedrichshafen 2004 (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 11:15:42 -0700
Hallo Rick, Der Scott in Loden und Lederhosen - stell's Dir mal vor! Himmiherrgott... Tschuess, 73, Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ Ehem. DJ0AC Well it was a lot of fun in my Bavarian costume. People visiting our b
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00060.html (9,869 bytes)

12. RE: [TenTec] Why is the Jupiter better? (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 10:23:55 -0700
Hi Carsten, Correction: You do not need to add filters to an IC-746Pro. You cannot, in fact - like the Jupiter, it is a DSP-based radio. The 746Pro covers HF, 6m and 2m. The IC-746Pro is also fitted
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00144.html (9,413 bytes)

13. RE: [TenTec] IC-7800 (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 19:40:18 -0700
Hi Ken, There is a linguistic issue here. As I understand it, the original Japanese text reads "Better than -60 dB". The reference (full rated output) is implied. For English-speaking "gaijin" audien
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00565.html (9,509 bytes)

14. RE: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 11:10:54 -0700
Hi Ken, Then why did such modes as SITOR with ARQ error-correction replace Morse radio-telegraphy on all point-to-point commercial radio-telegraph circuits decades ago? Cheers for now, 73, Adam VA7OJ
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00798.html (9,632 bytes)

15. RE: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:52:24 -0700
Hi Ken, Precisely. The reason for my original post was that I felt a need to qualify "works better" a little more closely. The original statement that "there isn't any such thing" as a digital mode w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00814.html (9,368 bytes)

16. RE: [TenTec] omni v short dits (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 14:58:53 -0700
Hi Tom, I used the term "commercial" intentionally, to point out that there are indeed instances (not necessarily in amateur radio) where digital modes other than Morse "work better" than Morse in ra
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00815.html (9,123 bytes)

17. RE: [TenTec] Re: Contesting (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:11:43 -0700
Hi Rick, "Joe HT" is the kid with the VHF-only licence whom you have seen charging around the flea-market in Dayton or Friedrichshafen, trusty handheld clutched in paw. I have a great new German word
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00262.html (9,875 bytes)

18. [TenTec] More on the IC-7800 Upgrade (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 10:40:55 -0700
The following was received from a friend of mine in Japan, who is an IC-7800 owner: I received a letter from ICOM Japan. ICOM has scheduled a firmware update in this coming September. The update incl
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00588.html (8,406 bytes)

19. RE: [TenTec] Boeing - IEEE (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 09:53:54 -0700
I was able to view both PDF's via my ISP. You may need to lodge a complaint with your ISP. Cheers for now, 73, Adam VA7OJ/AB4OJ Looks like they removed the info on Boeing & IEEE real fast... ________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00101.html (7,698 bytes)

20. RE: [TenTec] Boeing and IEEE NOI Comments (score: 1)
Author: Adam Farson <farson@shaw.ca>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 15:59:53 -0700
Dear Uncle DAvid, << and feed it to the dogs >> I do not eat the contents of whited sepulchres. Stub-wags, Big Max (VA7OJ's Boxer) http://www.qsl.net/ab4oj/max/max.html
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00110.html (7,670 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu