Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:edwmccann@yahoo.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Ten-Tec 228 vs 229 Ant Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Edward Mccann <edwmccann@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:02:40 -0800
Can anyone enlighten me (and others) as to differences between the later 229 models and 228 models. Presumably some technical improvements were made? Re the installed balun : is it a current or volta
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00121.html (7,358 bytes)

2. [TenTec] Ten-Tech Matchbox 229 vs 238 series. (score: 1)
Author: Edward Mccann <edwmccann@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2018 11:01:47 -0800
Thank you to those who replied. Yes, I mixed up the nomenclature. Was trying to suss out improvements/changes from the 229 to the newer 238 KW series. Senior moment, caught by all. Great answers from
/archives//html/TenTec/2018-02/msg00130.html (9,280 bytes)

3. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 168, Issue 1 (score: 1)
Author: Edward McCann <edwmccann@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:03:54 -0800
Denton Concur fully with your observation that Voltage Balun does not CMC suppression. My question trying to ask if the early TenTec tuners used a Voltage Balun (as did most the early Heathkit, Dentr
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-12/msg00015.html (7,841 bytes)

4. [TenTec] 229 A Antenna Tuner (score: 1)
Author: Edward McCann <edwmccann@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 11:42:01 -0800
Can any members of the group comment as to the nature of Balun in the 229A? Was it a Voltage Balun as was the early craze, or current and suitable for decent CMC suppression? Thank you, Ed McCann AG6
/archives//html/TenTec/2016-11/msg00329.html (6,826 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu