Mail Archive Search: <+from:dtx@verizon.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:dtx@verizon.net: 58 ]

Total 58 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 83, Issue 9 (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:22:36 -0500; I like what you say. Some, like you and I, have dealt with electrons at work for years, but it's not necessary to be a real ham. How many little boys and girls of all ages start with zero electric tr; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00073.html (10,893 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Worn out on the continual debates.... (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:16:42 -0500; Second! K3TX -- Original Message -- From: <d.e.warnick@comcast.net> To: <kg6tt@arrl.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 6:17 AM Subject: Re; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00137.html (12,164 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:04:43 -0500; Just leave the clock set at UTC. Who needs local time in the shack. K3TX -- Original Message -- From: "N4PY" <n4py@arrl.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00108.html (11,812 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] How many STILL waiting (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:27:07 -0500; A 2b even after 45 years can still hold its own. K3TX -- Original Message -- From: "Gary Smith" <Gary@doctorgary.net> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, Fe; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00388.html (10,637 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI - AGC and RF Gain Question (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:53:24 -0500; I've not noticed any such phenomenon on my VI. Dave,K3TX -- Original Message -- From: "Bruce Warner" <kansas4000@hotmail.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 12:58 PM Subj; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00383.html (9,231 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:43:10 -0500; 200 w out with everything else included including efficiency works out to getting close to a half horsepower - probably not too difficult for a healthy horse - but one person? K3TX -- Original Messag; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00437.html (10,389 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] bill orr article (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:01:40 -0500; I've been using a G5RV as a temporary antenna, not very high and have been getting out adequately with the barefoot Omni 6; its real merit is the ability to work all the HF bands with a single wire.; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00439.html (16,949 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:04:46 -0400; Jim, your statement is incomplete. Should read, "..any EE who lacks a copy of the ARRL hand book ...." How many hams realize that the Handbook ranks very near the top of the list of all-time best sel; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00077.html (10,083 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 01:29:42 -0400; Lessee, isn't 100pF more like j F(wf)x100 ohms (w being the closest my keyboard comes to lower case omega,) So we can't add the ohms without taking the square root of the sum of the squares, which sh; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00159.html (11,784 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] New Rig.... (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 01:30:48 -0400; You won't be sorry. - K3TX -- Original Message -- From: <lciotti@twcny.rr.com> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 9:47 AM Subject: [TenTec] New Rig.... So I took the plunge and p; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00160.html (8,889 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] CW weighting (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:21:25 -0400; I find non-standard weighting not nearly as easy to copy - a different accent as it were. Analogy: These Indians who seem to infest call centers may be fluent in English but I might understand one wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00262.html (12,085 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] The Left-handed VI+ (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:29:48 -0400; The saga of KlSRR is one more reason for all hams to learn CW - before it's too late! And when we hear one whose sending is a bit fuzzy at times we have to learn to bear with it until we KNOW it's a; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00287.html (12,374 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 01:07:52 -0400; Radiation from a feedline or from the antenna proper is radiaton, which is what a transmitter is supposed to be doing for a living. A good match is just supposed to increase the amount of transmitter; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00366.html (10,713 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 19:54:15 -0400; Re-read my comments on the RFI business. Especially the general rule: If one and only one TV in close proximity to the ham station is not bothered the rig is clean and nothing short of QRT will make; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00403.html (11,796 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 20:00:10 -0400; If the LP filter is actually needed Jerry's one-foot spacing should be an absolute maximum.....As short as possible. And to expand, the high-pass filter on a TV should be very close to the tuner itse; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00404.html (10,672 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 20:04:27 -0400; I doubt the value of an after-tuner filter - the filter needs to see a good match fore-and-aft. Ron is so right about the chances of filter damage - that would mean a good part of your output is goin; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00405.html (11,177 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:48:47 -0400; The best practical comment I've seen on this subject. K3TX -- Original Message -- From: "Rick Denney" <rick@rickdenney.com> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Monday,; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00441.html (11,020 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 00:10:54 -0400; Some of the high-pass filters on and off the market can be a bit flaky. from your description the problem is in no way from your set. Are there any near-by medium frequency broadcast transmitters? If; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00442.html (12,712 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238A settings? (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:42:54 -0400; The spark plug arrester has the disadvantage of rather blunt points. Much better, as someone mentioned, is a pair of copper (prefereably) or brass plates with facing sharp points, gapped about l/32"; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00268.html (12,543 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238A settings? (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:46:08 -0400; Agree except the spark plugs don't have the desirable sharp points - the breakdown potential in air from a sharp point is very much lower than from a smooth surface. K4TX -- Original Message -- From:; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-04/msg00269.html (12,030 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]