Mail Archive Search: <+from:dtx@verizon.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:dtx@verizon.net: 58 ]

Total 58 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 01:07:52 -0400; Radiation from a feedline or from the antenna proper is radiaton, which is what a transmitter is supposed to be doing for a living. A good match is just supposed to increase the amount of transmitter; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00367.html (9,596 bytes)
22. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 19:54:15 -0400; Re-read my comments on the RFI business. Especially the general rule: If one and only one TV in close proximity to the ham station is not bothered the rig is clean and nothing short of QRT will make; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00404.html (10,888 bytes)
23. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 20:00:10 -0400; If the LP filter is actually needed Jerry's one-foot spacing should be an absolute maximum.....As short as possible. And to expand, the high-pass filter on a TV should be very close to the tuner itse; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00405.html (10,724 bytes)
24. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 20:04:27 -0400; I doubt the value of an after-tuner filter - the filter needs to see a good match fore-and-aft. Ron is so right about the chances of filter damage - that would mean a good part of your output is goin; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00406.html (10,749 bytes)
25. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 23:48:47 -0400; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00442.html (10,809 bytes)
26. Re: [TenTec] Low Pass Filter (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 00:10:54 -0400; Some of the high-pass filters on and off the market can be a bit flaky. from your description the problem is in no way from your set. Are there any near-by medium frequency broadcast transmitters? If; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-05/msg00443.html (12,660 bytes)
27. Re: [TenTec] The Left-handed VI+ (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 21:29:48 -0400; The saga of KlSRR is one more reason for all hams to learn CW - before it's too late! And when we hear one whose sending is a bit fuzzy at times we have to learn to bear with it until we KNOW it's a; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-06/msg00288.html (12,252 bytes)
28. Re: [TenTec] SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 17:04:46 -0400; Jim, your statement is incomplete. Should read, "..any EE who lacks a copy of the ARRL hand book ...." How many hams realize that the Handbook ranks very near the top of the list of all-time best sel; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00077.html (10,085 bytes)
29. Re: [TenTec] OT SWR VS Power Loss (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 01:29:42 -0400; Lessee, isn't 100pF more like j F(wf)x100 ohms (w being the closest my keyboard comes to lower case omega,) So we can't add the ohms without taking the square root of the sum of the squares, which sh; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00159.html (11,848 bytes)
30. Re: [TenTec] New Rig.... (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 01:30:48 -0400; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00160.html (8,332 bytes)
31. Re: [TenTec] CW weighting (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:21:25 -0400; I find non-standard weighting not nearly as easy to copy - a different accent as it were. Analogy: These Indians who seem to infest call centers may be fluent in English but I might understand one wo; /archives//html/TenTec/2008-07/msg00261.html (12,290 bytes)
32. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI - AGC and RF Gain Question (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 23:53:24 -0500; Hi - I purchased an Omni VI through this list recently, and just have a general question. When I have the RF gain fully clockwise then engage the AGC either in slow or fast, it distorts the speaker,; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00383.html (9,103 bytes)
33. Re: [TenTec] OT (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 12:43:10 -0500; 200 w out with everything else included including efficiency works out to getting close to a half horsepower - probably not too difficult for a healthy horse - but one person? K3TX -- Original Messag; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00437.html (9,971 bytes)
34. Re: [TenTec] bill orr article (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:01:40 -0500; I've been using a G5RV as a temporary antenna, not very high and have been getting out adequately with the barefoot Omni 6; its real merit is the ability to work all the HF bands with a single wire.; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-01/msg00439.html (17,664 bytes)
35. Re: [TenTec] How many STILL waiting (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:27:07 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-02/msg00388.html (10,868 bytes)
36. Re: [TenTec] Paragon II (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2009 01:04:43 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-03/msg00109.html (12,063 bytes)
37. Re: [TenTec] TenTec Digest, Vol 83, Issue 9 (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 17:22:36 -0500; I like what you say. Some, like you and I, have dealt with electrons at work for years, but it's not necessary to be a real ham. How many little boys and girls of all ages start with zero electric tr; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00072.html (10,582 bytes)
38. Re: [TenTec] Worn out on the continual debates.... (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:16:42 -0500; Second! K3TX -- Original Message -- From: <d.e.warnick@comcast.net> To: <kg6tt@arrl.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Sunday, November 15, 2009 6:17 AM Subject: Re; /archives//html/TenTec/2009-11/msg00136.html (12,870 bytes)
39. Re: [TenTec] Renew License (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:04:21 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-01/msg00152.html (9,028 bytes)
40. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ the best and other great radios (score: 1): Author: "DAVID HELLER" <dtx@verizon.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:00:07 -0500; _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-01/msg00278.html (9,775 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3]