Mail Archive Search: <+from:dslosty@pipeline.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:dslosty@pipeline.com: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

41. [TenTec] Triton sidetone (score: 1): Author: dslosty@pipeline.com (dslosty); Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:26:04 -0700; Gee, If I remember my 540 correctly (recently sold), both sidetone pitch and volume are adjustable from bottom mounted pots. I never found the sound to be particularly "raspy" or unpleasant. I'd sug; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00226.html (7,420 bytes)
42. [TenTec] Re: Ten Tec Tritons (score: 1): Author: dslosty@pipeline.com (dslosty); Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:11:05 -0700; The audio CW filter for the Triton series was optional, with three selectable passbands, something like 500/250/150 Hz. It works quite well. There were no optional SSB filters. The standard crystal l; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00295.html (8,646 bytes)
43. [TenTec] Re: Ten Tec Customer service (score: 1): Author: dslosty@pipeline.com (dslosty); Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 04:13:00 -0700; Yep, Ten-Tec really does have great customer service. Around four years ago they still had parts for my Triton IV and recently they helped me with WARC mods to my OMNI-D. A great company. I also had; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00041.html (7,979 bytes)
44. [TenTec] Triton IV versus later rigs (score: 1): Author: dslosty@pipeline.com (dslosty); Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 04:14:01 -0700; Quoting Steve Ellington/N4LQ: (snip) The Triton through the Omni C were single conversion rigs with a 9mhz IF stage. Addition of 17 meters, pressure from imports and quest for greater selectivity pro; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00384.html (9,472 bytes)
45. [TenTec] Re: How's the New Vibro... (score: 1): Author: dslosty@pipeline.com (dslosty); Date: Sun, 06 Jun 1999 03:29:03 -0700; I fear that the demand for new bugs has dropped quite a bit. With the recent demise of martime CW, there are few commercial ops, who often used bugs, left. The majority of hams are now used to electr; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00063.html (8,013 bytes)
46. [TenTec] Inrad filters for Ten-Tec (score: 1): Author: dslosty@pipeline.com (dslosty); Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 03:57:50 -0700; Who or what is Inrad? Where can I find info on their filters? Thanks, Doug -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-RE; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00189.html (6,804 bytes)
47. [TenTec] Omni D version B, 30 meter mods (score: 1): Author: dslosty@pipeline.com (dslosty); Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 04:20:05 -0700; In the past on this reflector, there's been various comments saying that the Omni D version B (model 546B) can not be put onto 30 mtrs due to its crystal mixing scheme and resultant spurious emission; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00233.html (8,759 bytes)
48. [TenTec] Omni D 30 mtr mods (score: 1): Author: dslosty@pipeline.com (dslosty); Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 14:08:37 -0700; Mike, My post was not directed at you. Nevertheless, I apologize for any implication. I may have well misread VARIOUS posts discussing this problem. Upon reflection, it's obvious that the 9MHZ IF wou; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00243.html (7,545 bytes)
49. [TenTec] Omni-D, version B, drifting.......................... (score: 1): Author: dslosty@pipeline.com (dslosty); Date: Mon, 24 May 1999 04:17:55 -0700; My recently acquired Omni-D, version B, seems to drift a bit too much - at least for my tastes. Fronm a cold start, the rig drifts upwards for the next two hours with a total drift of around 550HZ. A; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00473.html (8,324 bytes)
50. [TenTec] Ten-Tec Triton IV (score: 1): Author: dslosty@pipeline.com (dslosty); Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 02:02:02 -0700; Over the years I've had consistent bandswitching problems in my Triton IV (otherwise known as the model 540). Bandswitching is sometimes erratic with symptoms of loss of drive/receive, etc until the; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-04/msg00110.html (7,266 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 50
Page: [1] [2] [3]