Mail Archive Search: <+from:drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Delta 580 for Young Ham (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 10:12:25 -0700; My grandson has taken an interest in my ham radio activities and would like to become a ham. In my search for a good radio for him to listen to the bands, I have decided that a Ten-Tec Delta 580 woul; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-05/msg00099.html (8,974 bytes)
2. Re: [TenTec] Delta 580 for Young Ham (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 10:45:39 -0700; Thanks for all the great replies! This list is indeed a great resource. Here's what I have learned about the Delta 580: The base radio came with only an SSB filter and crystals for 160, 80, 40, 20, 1; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-05/msg00114.html (9,427 bytes)
3. Re: [TenTec] Delta 580 for Young Ham (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 11:59:11 -0700; I downloaded a manual off the Ten-Tec website that should answer all my questions. Should have thought of that first. Darrell -- Darrell Bellerive Amateur Radio Station VA7TO Grand Forks BC Canada __; /archives//html/TenTec/2010-05/msg00117.html (10,897 bytes)
4. [TenTec] WTB: Older Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:17:17 -0800; I am looking for a low priced used Jupiter. This will be a temporary rig for me for the next few months or so. I just want to try out a Ten-Tec DSP based rig and an older Jupiter is the most cost eff; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00082.html (8,173 bytes)
5. Re: [TenTec] WTB: Older Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 11:43:33 -0800; I did consider Ten-Tec 30 day trial offer. But for me, I am not so sure about DSP based radios. From my limited exposure to them I have found the sound to be thin, and digital, with grating band nois; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00105.html (11,360 bytes)
6. Re: [TenTec] WTB: Older Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 17:26:01 -0800; I have a deal to purchase a nice Jupiter. Thank you to all who sent me offers! Many of you have asked me to keep you updated on my Jupiter adventure, so I will post my first impressions in a few week; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00110.html (8,689 bytes)
7. Re: [TenTec] WTB: Older Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 22:01:36 -0800; I did wonder if indeed the Omni VII and Eagle represented a big leap in DSP radio technology over the earlier Ten-Tec radios, in particular the Jupiter. I read through a number of Yahoo groups and th; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00124.html (12,193 bytes)
8. Re: [TenTec] WTB: Older Jupiter (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 10:33:09 -0800; No argument from me on this particular aspect of the difference from the Jupiter to the Omni VII or Eagle. The next line in my post that was quoted below was "I think that close in dynamic range has; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00132.html (14,991 bytes)
9. Re: [TenTec] New or Used Decision; Omni VII (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 12:46:38 -0800; This is always a concern purchasing a radio that has been on the market for a while. However if it does all that one needs in a radio, is waiting for a replacement worthwhile? Perhaps a used one is a; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00159.html (11,006 bytes)
10. [TenTec] My Jupiter Experiment (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:49:47 -0800; For all of you who have been following my Jupiter experiment, I promised my first impressions. This all started with my desire to see if indeed I would like a DSP based radio. I have been entrenched; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-01/msg00172.html (8,962 bytes)
11. Re: [TenTec] No [mandatory] CW (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2013 13:49:23 -0800; Here is a link to a graph of the number of field day participants over the years. This may be a bit more representative of the number of active hams than the number of licensees. http://members.shaw.; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-02/msg00461.html (8,678 bytes)
12. Re: [TenTec] Open Sourcing Firmware... (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 11:27:46 -0700; This would be great to see. I suspect that the reality will be that the firmware contains some algorithms that are intellectual property of Ten-Tec or other companies. Ten-Tec will not want to releas; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00350.html (9,819 bytes)
13. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 18:30:35 -0700; I think that Ten-Tec could carve out a new niche in the market by open sourcing their firmware. There is a thread going already on this, so I will not duplicate that discussion, but rather poke at th; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00357.html (14,965 bytes)
14. Re: [TenTec] Orion 2 situation (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 19:01:05 -0700; I agree that Ten-Tec website is less than satisfactory. Clearly they need help in that area. A site search still does not find anything to do with the new 506 Rebel. As someone who spent many years w; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00360.html (11,522 bytes)
15. Re: [TenTec] Orion II has ended production (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 10:35:15 -0700; What we need is a list ranking transmitter IMD. Perhaps even a worst polluters list. In the over five decades since the Collins 32S-3 transmitter was introduced, not one manufacturer has bettered it.; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-07/msg00024.html (10,844 bytes)
16. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 07:46:03 -0700; The other factor that I don't think has been mentioned is ground loss of the transmitted signal. For horizontal antennas, antenna height is the major factor, and for vertical antennas, radials. The i; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00044.html (16,985 bytes)
17. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 09:18:34 -0700; It is not just the quality of the ground, but rather the proximity to the ground. Ground losses are present for a low horizontal antenna regardless of the quality of the ground. For a vertical antenn; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00049.html (19,447 bytes)
18. Re: [TenTec] OT: Openwire/Window Line and Bad Wx (score: 1): Author: Darrell Bellerive <drbellerive.va7to@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2013 10:04:23 -0700; Jon, The radiation pattern of a dipole at 1/4 wavelength above ground is circular shaped in both the vertical and horizontal planes. As the dipole is lowered in height, the pattern changes to focus o; /archives//html/TenTec/2013-08/msg00051.html (21,957 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]