Mail Archive Search: <+from:dcalvin@austin.ibm.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:dcalvin@austin.ibm.com: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] Retrieving Old Postings (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1998 08:25:29 -0600; The request from Rob, KE2BA, made me think that a reminder is probably timely. If you saw something on the TenTec reflector and would like to retrieve it, remember that all the postings are archived; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-04/msg00012.html (7,312 bytes)
2. [TenTec] Centaur on Wake? (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Mon, 02 Mar 1998 14:35:35 -0600; Say, is my eyesight going out, or is that a Centaur sitting on the operating desk in the photo on the Wake Island DXpedition web site? Check out: http://www.goldtel.net/ddxa/wphoto6.html 73, Duane AC; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00009.html (6,935 bytes)
3. [TenTec] CQ Magazine review of Omni-VI+ (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 10:24:04 -0600; I agree - "CQ" magazine's reviews of equipment have become less than useful, and in some cases misleading. I like the ARRL's test report format, but even they occasionally leave things out that I wou; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00031.html (8,579 bytes)
4. [TenTec] CENTAUR (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Mon, 09 Mar 1998 10:41:01 -0600; Hmm, interesting comment, Loren. I ran my Centaur for 16+ hours over the weekend on the ARRL DX Contest, driving it with the Omni-VI+ with some amount of speech processing. I had one instance where,; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00107.html (7,924 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Re:{TenTec} Paragon Kam interface (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Mon, 23 Mar 1998 09:09:54 -0600; One note to be aware of - Kantronics wiring diagrams in their KAM-Plus manual are INCORRECT in describing the pinouts on the 8-pin DIN connector. The numbers are correct when they describe function r; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00188.html (7,864 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Re: {TenTec} Paragon Kam Interface (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 10:08:09 -0600; Thanks, all, for the responses. Sounds like my logic wasn't faulty in how I defined my own setup (FSK only, with CW wiring available if needed). Your milage may vary, but now I don't have to yank cab; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00208.html (7,219 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Any Centurion's in the Austin, TX area? (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Tue, 24 Mar 1998 10:10:28 -0600; Before upgrading to a Centurion, I'd like to see/hear one in action. Does anyone in the Austin, Texas area who has one mind a visitor in the shack for a half hour to check one out? Sorry for blasting; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-03/msg00209.html (7,146 bytes)
8. [TenTec] TenTec parts at Ross (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 15:26:28 -0600; Sorry, no more #216 filters at Ross. 73, Duane AC5AA -- Duane A. Calvin "All statements are mine only, not my employer's." ac5aa@juno.com -or- duanec@prodigy.net Day: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com -- FAQ on; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00034.html (6,823 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Re: WTB: SSB filters (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Wed, 04 Feb 1998 10:10:04 -0600; As posted yesterday, Ross Distributing Company has some filters remaining of "old" new stock. Their last 216 filter was gone yesterday afternoon (after I ordered it), but they still show a 218 filter; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00043.html (7,276 bytes)
10. [TenTec] Omni-VI+ Chirps (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 11:03:39 -0600; keying as being anywhere close to qualifying as the "worst on the air", far from it. I agree, it's also not the best, which I'd like it to be. Because others don't agree with you on the severity of; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00314.html (7,941 bytes)
11. [TenTec] 1254 SWL Receiver vs. competitors (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:26:47 -0600; I know this is mixing apples and oranges, but has anyone seen reviews of the 1254 SWL receiver compared to other portables? How did it do? 73, Duane AC5AA -- Duane A. Calvin "All statements are mine; /archives//html/TenTec/1998-02/msg00319.html (6,927 bytes)
12. [TenTec] Questions about Tentec Delta II. (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 08:39:10 -0500; The only copy I got of this table that looks OK is the one received on Juno (from which I mailed it). So, I'm guessing it was a mess on most of your readers. I'll redo below without tabs, using monos; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-09/msg00108.html (8,215 bytes)
13. [TenTec] DX4WIN Logging Software (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 20:07:36 +0000; Since the subject of rig control and logging software has been brought up, I'd like to pass along a recommendation out of my experience. I've used several of the currently available logging programs; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-05/msg00076.html (7,688 bytes)
14. [TenTec] RE: The New Omni-VI Plus (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 14:49:30 +0000; Don't know what happened to my note from last night on this topic - maybe I mis-addressed it. I found the answer to my question. TT uses the "Kenwood" version - IF center frequency is shifted. (This; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00109.html (7,806 bytes)
15. [TenTec] RE: The New Omni-VI Plus (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 18:04:00 +0000; I'm not implying I'm an expert on IF Shift vs. Passband Tuning. In fact, I'm asking the question hoping that the Omni-VI doesn't work like the Kenwood IF Shift. What led me to believe that it does is; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-02/msg00111.html (7,573 bytes)
16. DSP's (was Re: OMNI VII) (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Sat, 01 Feb 1997 00:01:43 +0000; OK, the moderator can feel free to purge this one, and let's not overstay our welcome. I've done considerable experimentation with audio DSP's. That includes owning two, a Timewave DSP-9 (started as; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-01/msg00001.html (10,540 bytes)
17. Packet on the 2m Transceiver kit (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 17:51:01 +0000; I'm considering the 2m transceiver kit as an additional rig to use exclusively for packet. A couple of questions come to mind. Is the switching on the rig fast enough to be used for 9600 bps packet?; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-01/msg00169.html (7,233 bytes)
18. Packet on the 2m Transceiver kit (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Tue, 28 Jan 1997 19:54:01 +0000; Jeepers, right in front of my eyes. OK, so it's designed for packet use, and is wired, ready to go. Now, who has used it at 9600 bps, presumably what it is designed for having this kind of connection; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-01/msg00172.html (7,659 bytes)
19. OMNI VII (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Fri, 31 Jan 1997 21:25:32 +0000; My recommendation on DSP is to not include it unless it is IF-level DSP. External audio level DSP's are usually much more versatile than internal rig-mounted audio units. In addition, the user can re; /archives//html/TenTec/1997-01/msg00227.html (7,753 bytes)
20. Centaur 411 (score: 1): Author: dcalvin@austin.ibm.com (Duane Calvin); Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 21:44:23 +0000; I ran some tests on my new Centaur 411 last night for power and got the following results: POWER OUT XMTR XMTR FREQ 411 Bird SWR DRV W Ig Ip Notes -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1800 450 575 1.5:1 80 135 64; /archives//html/TenTec/1996-12/msg00172.html (9,438 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]