Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net: 405 ]

Total 405 documents matching your query.

161. Re: [TenTec] Any update on a replacement for the Orion II? (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 08:06:23 -0700 (PDT)
I'll preface my query with the caveat that I'm not a software engineer nor do I program for a living. I know C (a little) and programmed in mostly FORTRAN when I did do a lot of programming. I've nev
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00101.html (17,048 bytes)

162. Re: [TenTec] USER INTERFACE: Wish List for ORION-III (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 13:47:19 -0700 (PDT)
I must admit that the LED matrix used on the O2 is very elegant. I know of no other radio that displays the VFO status quite like that. Most of the time, the status is annuciated somewhere in the dis
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00163.html (15,481 bytes)

163. [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:50:54 -0500
I'm considering getting RX-366 with a full set of filters. Which are the better roofing filters: the InRad or the TT filters? Also, I couldn't find any mention of the RX366 on the TT site. Did I miss
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00414.html (8,018 bytes)

164. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 22:51:55 -0500
I can no longer find mention of it anywhere on their web site. I guess I have missed my chance as it must have been discontinued. Kim N5OP Also, I couldn't find any mention of the RX366 on the TT sit
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00417.html (9,497 bytes)

165. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:19:58 -0500
Yes, I saw that. While it's a comforting thing to see, and it seems like it should make for a better filter, does it make any practical difference in filter performance? Kim N5OP "People that make mu
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00436.html (10,840 bytes)

166. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
True. I expect to use the radio for many years to come, though, and so adding the RX-366 remains for me an attractive option. If my concern were ROI, adding the RX366 would be ill advised.  Heck, I s
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00452.html (11,487 bytes)

167. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:32:09 -0700 (PDT)
I bought one, the last of the existing stock, I was told. Will I make more contacts with it? Well, um... Probably not. Will I work more rare DX with it? I sorta doubt it.  Now, I like to think of mys
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00460.html (11,810 bytes)

168. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
No worries! I occasionally get to buy myself toys, too! My kids aren't in college, yet, but this won't make or break their ability to go. Rest assured that if I thought I had an instrument that would
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00463.html (11,008 bytes)

169. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? - Shielded Filters (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:19:51 -0500
This is for the additional roofing filters in my RX366. I agree that shielding doesn't hurt but, as you note, it probably doesn't help all that much for this application, either. Kim N5OP It is a fac
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00467.html (13,599 bytes)

170. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 21:09:43 -0500
I need to save this lovely aphorism! Kim N5OP 73 de W6OGC Jim Allen All depreciating assets....but loads of fun. Sent from my iPad On Apr 24, 2014, at 8:35 PM, Dave Edwards <kd2e@comcast.net> wrote:
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00472.html (15,938 bytes)

171. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2014 20:41:02 -0600
I've never been told of this trick for tuning for maximum efficiency of a class C amplifier. Is there someplace I can go to learn a bit more about it? I ask because I have a WRL Globe Champion AM tra
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00016.html (17,905 bytes)

172. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 21:42:09 -0600
Ah! I've noticed this but never understood it. At least with the Globe Champ 350, the power output can increase quite a bit off resonance to the right, but the plate current also quickly gets way out
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00018.html (12,848 bytes)

173. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:25:17 -0800 (PST)
I have to mostly agree. As I was growing up, my Dad (W5JHJ, SK 2007) always treated the place we owned a bit like a rental: no holes in walls, no permanent installations of antennas, etc. I never lik
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00060.html (13,791 bytes)

174. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:19:16 -0800 (PST)
Yes, that's the one. As far as I know, I'm the only guy to ever buy one! The mod isn't trivial. You'll need to change the filter capacitor stack and build a FWB rectifier instead of using the origina
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00063.html (12,712 bytes)

175. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:30:33 -0800 (PST)
One other thing: The AL-*)A meter would only read B+ up to 3500 V. You''ll have change the meter shunt resistor. I changed mine such that the meter now read B+/2. Thus, 4 kV yields a meter reading of
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00064.html (13,647 bytes)

176. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:32:00 -0800 (PST)
I meant AL-80A, not an AL-*)A. Sheesh... Kim N5OP One other thing: The AL-*)A meter would only read B+ up to 3500 V. You''ll have change the meter shunt resistor. I changed mine such that the meter n
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00065.html (14,215 bytes)

177. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:17:09 -0800 (PST)
That makes perfect sense, Rick and I agree completely. It's a fair bit of work for, frankly, not a lot of return, even with the 750 W limit. I learned a LOT by doing it, so in that regard, I got my m
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00072.html (16,194 bytes)

178. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kimberly Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 13:52:12 -0800 (PST)
What we call "hardware cloth" is a galvanized steel mesh with anywhere form 1/8" squares to 1/2" squares. The stuff is simply a coarse galvanized steel screen. I used the kind with 1/4" square openin
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00074.html (18,710 bytes)

179. Re: [TenTec] In praise of older technology (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:31:30 -0600
I hate to be pedantic and off topic (but that won't stop me)... I don't think any helicopter tip are run supersonic because of huge efficiency losses. Here are numbers for the Bell UH-1 Iroqios (aka
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00089.html (21,549 bytes)

180. Re: [TenTec] QSK or not? (score: 1)
Author: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 13:14:09 -0500
Why use relays when we have PIN diodes? Kim N5OP "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-03/msg00155.html (14,853 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu