Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:csturner@kcbx.net: 149 ]

Total 149 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] FS Items (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 15:16:34 -0800
Some stuff I'd like to sell to finance my mobile/portable setup. We just had a 6.5 quake nearby (got me motivated to charge my 2 RV batteries, make up power cables, and order a mobile/portable rig...
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg01222.html (7,669 bytes)

2. [TenTec] FS items (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 17:30:59 -0800
I have some surplus, I am finally in escrow on my first home (wish me luck!) Soon I can set up a real antenna. A few things will need to go before I move. Ten Tec model 206A calibrator. This was norm
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00502.html (7,568 bytes)

3. [TenTec] FS items sold, one remains (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:23:31 -0800
I have sold the 301, 307 and 206. The 705 mike remains if anyone wants one, it does very nice audio for the Ten Tec rigs, I just find I now prefer the D-104, it fits in my hands better :-) . Clark WA
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00533.html (6,804 bytes)

4. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni D, Why so quiet ? (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:34:56 -0800
Rick has this right. The early OMNI rigs were not very sensitive on the low bands but the sensitivity increased with frequency. This is one very easy explanation for the "quiet" receiver characterist
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00583.html (9,341 bytes)

5. Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec Omni D, Why so quiet ? (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 10:40:14 -0800
In my own careful experiments with the OMNI-C vs the TS-440 (ladder vs ceramic followed by monolithic lattice filters) the static levels are the same for the same level of sensitivity. If I cut back
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00596.html (9,609 bytes)

6. [TenTec] About the incivility of our posts (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 21:03:34 -0800
On Saturday, February 28, 2004, at 03:37 PM, Tommy wrote: Subject: [TenTec] Re: About the incivility of our posts Yuri, I value your contributions and hope you'll participate in the orion@contesting.
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-02/msg00947.html (11,304 bytes)

7. Re: [TenTec] Omni6+ and Opt3 (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 06:44:03 -0800
The OMNI-6 option 3 is said to be equivalent in specs to the plus. It has the same features. There are just a few small changes to the plus, all surface mounted components on the boards, the TCXO sta
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00229.html (9,376 bytes)

8. Re: [TenTec] Corsair II question on filters (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:03:06 -0800
On Saturday, March 27, 2004, at 06:30 PM, Jim Larsen - AL7FS wrote: Which filters must stay with the radio? I would say for sure the 285 and 282 can go. The 220 filter, I am not sure. Is it needed fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-03/msg00803.html (8,046 bytes)

9. [TenTec] BPL suit (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 10:19:24 -0700
On Friday, April 30, 2004, at 07:56 AM, WD4K wrote: on a big dog. Merely an irritation. Segway to the 1000-100,000-200,000 (pick a number) hams and communications equipment users simply signing a pap
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-04/msg00644.html (9,496 bytes)

10. [TenTec] swap (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 09:44:31 -0700
Not ten tec (if they sold these, I'd have them :-) but wanted to work with this list first off. I have the MFJ 259 antenna analyzer barely used and I need a noise canceller like the ANC-4. Anyone lik
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00136.html (6,866 bytes)

11. Re: [TenTec] Progess Energy (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 09:50:12 -0700
On Friday, May 7, 2004, at 08:58 AM, <k4dlj@bellsouth.net> wrote: Ron, Was up to Charlotte last week and the locals are not real happy with what is going on... needless to say. Take a look who wrote
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00138.html (7,520 bytes)

12. Re: [TenTec] INRAD filter for OMNI VI/Plus series (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Fri, 21 May 2004 09:33:15 -0700
Hi Dave (and the group) - I made some similar mods to some of my older Kenwood gear to good advantage, but I lose the Noise Blanker in the process. I don't have my schematic handy, does the NB sample
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00658.html (8,051 bytes)

13. Re: [TenTec] Info on the Argonaut 515? (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 10:55:15 -0700
As I recall, Tim, the 515 was not cheap (compared to other rigs people wanted at that time). The 515 has a solid receiver, same basic design as the Triton IV, probably some improvement over the 509 (
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00686.html (8,602 bytes)

14. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ filter question (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 20:51:49 -0700
Hi Tim - Yes, you'll need the pair so that the PBT operates properly and the audio passband is widened. Both SSB filters are in line for PBT operation. I have jumped the 6.3 MHz filter before with a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-05/msg00861.html (8,285 bytes)

15. Re: [TenTec] E-ham Bad Orion Review (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 09:41:14 -0700
It's odd how there are a few folks with major problems and seem to be many more who don't have them. That doesn't mean that those who don't have them are being disingenuous. And doesn't mean that tho
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00715.html (11,533 bytes)

16. Re: [TenTec] FS: Ten Tec Paragon (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:58:44 -0700
Hi Tim - I'd like to see a picture or two! I may be interested, wish you luck in raising money (are you buying an Orion?) Clark WA3JPG On Wednesday, June 30, 2004, at 02:33 PM, NZ8J wrote: I have a n
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-06/msg00859.html (8,153 bytes)

17. Re: [TenTec] Reflector Problem (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 06:45:16 -0700
Virus activity. I've been through similar junk, some virus infected machine uses my email address to send nonsense and it gets returned to "sender" (me!) - it means nothing and will go away when the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00015.html (8,468 bytes)

18. Re: [TenTec] iCom's approach to the 7800 issues (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 21:01:21 -0700
I believe that the way to discuss the technical achievements of state-of-the-art Ten Tec gear is to discuss Ten Tec gear, with an occasional comparison. I find the very heavy criticisms of ICOM dishe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00051.html (7,337 bytes)

19. Re: [TenTec] Receiver Specs - Orion et al (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 13:45:07 -0700
On Friday, July 9, 2004, at 12:34 PM, Bill Meahan wrote: I can't speak to the Orion (I don't own one) but I do own a TenTec Corsair II. The other night I was playing around comparing (by ear) my new
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00285.html (8,000 bytes)

20. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ classic (score: 1)
Author: Clark Savage Turner <csturner@kcbx.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 08:51:49 -0700
For lack of a better example, I can say this.. As a young and silly ham I hadnt a clue what a good radio was.. I was more interested in bells and whistles and not what TT This is an interesting state
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00386.html (11,401 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]
This search system is powered by Namazu