- 41. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor "TX IMD" (score: 1)
- Author: "Charles P. Steinmetz" <charles_steinmetz@lavabit.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 03:14:31 -0400
- Guys, I maintain there are a lot less lids and a lot more bad radios then you think! Any ham who takes for granted what his or her radio is doing, without measuring it him- or herself and correcting
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00181.html (11,343 bytes)
- 42. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor "TX IMD" (score: 1)
- Author: "Charles P. Steinmetz" <charles_steinmetz@lavabit.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 06:11:03 -0400
- What you have just defined would mean the end of ham radio. If so, then so be it -- but I'm confident that wouldn't happen. Hopefully, it *would* weed out most of the people who can't be bothered to
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00183.html (14,722 bytes)
- 43. Re: [TenTec] RF Speech Processor "TX IMD" (score: 1)
- Author: "Charles P. Steinmetz" <charles_steinmetz@lavabit.com>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 02:01:59 -0400
- Under your theory, CS, then it means anyone who buys all brand new TenTec equipment directly from the factory, has no right to expect his radio and amp to be within specification and operating proper
- /archives//html/TenTec/2013-06/msg00209.html (12,983 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu