Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:chacuff@cableone.net: 164 ]

Total 164 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] How much for an Orion III? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:03:49 -0500
Yep....google the St. Julian's Creek massacre for pictures of piles of R-390 series receivers sitting out in the weather. Fortunately the destruction of those were stopped and all were sold surplus..
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00333.html (21,536 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] How much for an Orion III? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 20:56:15 -0500
Nothing except they both are discussions about things we really can't do anything about....no harm either way. And I care about both....one is our history and the other our future...both important. T
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00336.html (23,691 bytes)

123. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 04:28:01 +0000
Gosh I hope not...I was hoping to pick one up myself once I got the cash together... Cecil K5DL I can no longer find mention of it anywhere on their web site. I guess I have missed my chance as it mu
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00418.html (8,860 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 10:50:55 -0500
The market for the 366 was the installed base if existing transceivers. It was marketed as an upgrade..not just an option for new receivers. It put the Orion on a more even footing with the K3 in tha
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00438.html (12,769 bytes)

125. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 13:21:34 -0500
I don't consider my OII to be any less worthy of the upgrade since it's been discontinued. I've not really seen a decrease in prices of used OIIs over the last few months...not any more so than any o
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00451.html (11,784 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:29:25 -0500
Hi John, Understood....but I didn't get from your response whether the RX-366 has been discontinued or not. Reading between the lines you seem to indicate that decision has not been made. Cecil K5DL
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00455.html (9,510 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 16:37:22 -0500
Yep...Thanks...that's great news. It had been reported that it was no longer listed on the web site. Thanks John... 73 Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ Ten
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00466.html (9,516 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] RX-366? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 20:42:00 -0500
All depreciating assets....but loads of fun. Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/t
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00470.html (14,156 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI mystery (score: 1)
Author: <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:35:02 +0000
If that just came back from the factory I would ship it back up to them...sounds like a simple alignment issue but it should have been caught in final checkout before being shipped. Without some test
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-04/msg00587.html (9,526 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] Subreceiver RX-366 (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 21:33:14 -0500
Wonderful... Disappointed for sure... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listin
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00014.html (8,794 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 20:23:45 -0500
That's true if one has the space to dedicate another PC and monitor and mouse and whatever else is needed. Certainly that would be a bit easier to see but I would never run it on the same PC I'm usin
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00032.html (12,604 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 14:57:41 -0500
I've had both...the only time I ran my Yaesu at 200 w out was when I wasn't using the amp...forget and dial it back on the newer amps and it can damage things... My amps were older and needed 125 or
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00079.html (12,182 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] Panadapters (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 15:00:14 -0500
Yep...it would be terrible to have to use a logging scale to be able to find ones net.... Ha... Cecil Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@cont
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00082.html (21,242 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] Eagle problem? (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 14:31:05 -0500
I'm curious what mode he is running...I wouldn't expect that with one if the intermittent modes...but with AM, RTTY, or one of the digital modes sounds like he might be hitting a duty cycle limit. Ho
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00122.html (9,407 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ questions (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 14:34:34 -0500
I think two of the filter slots were termed as option slots....so 3 standard and 5 fully loaded. The voice synthesizer pretty much just annunciates the frequency displayed. Not sure what they are wor
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00123.html (7,772 bytes)

136. [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 09:57:44 -0500
Wow....didn't see that coming. RF Concepts (Alpha) and Ten-Tec. No telling what the future holds... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list Te
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00163.html (6,976 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] Alpha Amplifiers and TEN-TEC Merge (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 10:09:51 -0500
And all under the RF Concepts banner... I'm guessing the Ten-Tec amps will either be discontinued or become the low end Alpha amps...there have been many asking for a more affordable Alpha amp design
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00168.html (14,277 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] Merger (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:30:57 -0500
And maybe you can explain that further..... Cecil K5DL Sent from my iPad _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00215.html (7,926 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] Alpha Amplifiers and TEN-TEC Merge (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 18:37:26 -0500
John Thanks for taking the time to comment. Of course in times like these the rumor mill is running wide open...and understandably so...many of us feel like part of the Ten-Tec family. I've never own
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00217.html (10,908 bytes)

140. Re: [TenTec] TenTec and Alpha merger not a good thing (score: 1)
Author: Cecil <chacuff@cableone.net>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 19:03:06 -0500
Been a year since you owned a Ten-Tec product but you remain a member of the list...strange. And I do disagree with you on several points. You sold the best SDR with a front panel radio when you sold
/archives//html/TenTec/2014-05/msg00218.html (10,944 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]
This search system is powered by Namazu