Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:btippett@alum.mit.edu: 660 ]

Total 660 documents matching your query.

81. [TenTec] Orion Warmup for CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 12:10:42 -0500
Decided to warmup using Orion on 10 meters in the LZ DX Contest today, and discovered some interesting settings while making about 120 QSO's (mostly weak EU): Case 1 - some atmospheric noise on the b
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00614.html (8,129 bytes)

82. [Orion] Good news from K1EA re Orion CT fans! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 12:33:49 -0500
Yippee! Just in time for CQ WW CW! Thanks to Ken K1EA. 73, Bill W4ZV [ct-user] CT9.92 with TenTec Orion Support http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/CT-User/2003-11/msg00059.html This should be
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00634.html (8,238 bytes)

83. [Orion] [TenTec] Orion Warmup for CQ WW CW (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 07:03:19 -0500
KE5C wrote: If you, or anyone else, comes up with some magic settings for the ARRL 160 the first weekend in December, please let us know. John, I haven't used Orion in a 160 contest yet, but have us
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00645.html (8,445 bytes)

84. [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:01:52 -0500
the 1.5 KW neighbor within a mile of me. Well, unfortunately I could not be on the same band as my AGC pumps everywhere. It renders the 756PRO II virtually useless... I'll bet the K2 receiver ($669 i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00649.html (8,225 bytes)

85. [TenTec] One complicated radio! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 10:09:33 -0500
John, did you miss the part where I said the settings should work for all but 1% of QSO's? If you want to extact maximum performance from any product, whether it is a radio, camera, or automobile, yo
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00651.html (7,719 bytes)

86. [TenTec] One complicated radio! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 15:40:18 -0500
BW) design issues, meaning does the ORION design / implementation have some problems? OR... are these issues necessary to get a better performing RX function. Great questions Lee! The simple answer i
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00664.html (10,825 bytes)

87. [TenTec] RE: More to Orion vs Icom 756PRO II (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 17:59:15 -0500
would be more apples-to-apples. You can Mike! Most used K2's sell for the kit cost alone. There are even guys who enjoy building them so much that they would probably build you a new one for free if
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00671.html (9,031 bytes)

88. [TenTec] One complicated radio! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 21:43:32 -0500
Most of my experience on SSB with Orion has been on 10 meters, primarily in the CQ WW SSB. Here are my notes from that contest describing how Orion performed: http://dayton.akorn.net/pipermail/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00684.html (9,019 bytes)

89. [TenTec] One complicated radio! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 06:19:46 -0500
lack of other interfering sigals? Yes. I believe it may be due to the IMDDR3 performance not creating internal distortion products within the passband. Whatever the reason, it was noticeably differen
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00702.html (8,332 bytes)

90. [TenTec] One complicated radio! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:13:47 -0500
not generated in receivers. Tom, I'm referring to IMD products generated in the receiver's passband. These sound like "bleeps and bloops" on CW, and are phantom signals created within the receiver du
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00704.html (9,896 bytes)

91. [Orion] Orion in CQWW CW (score: 1)
Author: webform@b4h.net (by way of Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>)
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 07:14:19 -0500
CQ Worldwide DX Contest, CW I'll write more about Orion later but thought you might like to see these early results. Scott W4PA had a very nice SOAB score (7.78M) operating NT1Y but I haven't seen th
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00005.html (8,844 bytes)

92. [TenTec] Crystal vs. DSP Filtering (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 14:23:13 -0500
Hi John, There are two distinct schools of thought on this, nicely summarized here by SM5BSZ (he developed the Linrad DSP program used by many EME guys): http://antennspecialisten.se/~sm5bsz/weakcom.
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00056.html (9,110 bytes)

93. [TenTec] Congratulations Scott! (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 14:46:22 -0500
So far it appears that Scott W4PA has a nice 10% lead in claimed scores for the Single Operator All Band category in the CQ WW CW. USA SOAB HP (Top 10 claimed scores so far): Call QSOs Zones Cntry hr
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00059.html (7,532 bytes)

94. [TenTec] Orion on Elecraft's Receiver Summary Page (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 21:21:41 -0500
http://www.elecraft.com/K2_perf.htm Maybe they should move Orion to the top of their list. 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00076.html (6,741 bytes)

95. [TenTec] Re Orion on Elecraft's Receiver Summary Page (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 14:25:57 -0500
roofing filters, you can consider the IP3 and IMD3 numbers to be 5 dB better than the ARRL measured. However, again we do not KNOW what the ARRL test techs did..... they just don't say in the applica
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00096.html (9,043 bytes)

96. [TenTec] Orion does great in ARRL 160M contest (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 15:37:58 -0500
Nice report Tom and thanks for some creative ideas on using diversity receive. I played a bit in the contest mainly to check out Orion's front-end under 160 contest conditions, which is the toughest
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00238.html (7,695 bytes)

97. Re: [TenTec] ORION vs OMNI VI (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 07:17:41 -0500
W3ULS wrote: It's interesting to compare the ORION's numbers against the venerable OMNI VI. In a QEX article (9-10/02) T. Raczek included a table showing the drop-off in performance between measureme
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00381.html (7,499 bytes)

98. [TenTec] Orion Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:17:31 -0500
Orion's swept BDR and IMD graphs are very impressive! While I was waiting for this report to be published, I went through most of the ETR's for popular radios on ARRL's summary page here: http://www.
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00405.html (10,179 bytes)

99. [TenTec] Orion Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 17:58:13 -0500
Argonaut V ranks on this comparison. Rod, I have it at 58/59 dB for IMDDR3 and 66 dB for BDR. I did not include all radios tested in the list...mainly those I thought of as potential contest radios.
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00411.html (8,682 bytes)

100. [TenTec] Orion Expanded Test Report (score: 1)
Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:36:54 -0500
The ARRL expanded test report shows Orion IP@ at 77dB pream off, and 73 dB preamp on. Apparently there is a discrepancy in the QST article, which has IP2 at 63 dB for both preamp on and off. Elecraft
/archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00421.html (8,799 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu