- 61. [TenTec] SSB Bandwidth, readability, power, etc. (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2003 07:14:01 -0500
- Was away since last Thursday and read all the comments about 2.8 kHz SSB bandwidth. This reminded me of a question I had about Orion. You can adjust the TX SSB bandwidth from 900 Hz to 3900 Hz (I ass
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00106.html (7,898 bytes)
- 62. Re: VS: [TenTec] Orion and PTT? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 10:10:25 -0500
- K3BU wrote: I want it to stay PTT. Any way of doing it??? This was one of the first things I asked for, but have been told it is impossible for CW. Seems so strange to allow it for SSB but not CW, si
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00147.html (7,602 bytes)
- 63. VS: VS: [TenTec] Orion and PTT (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 12:08:14 -0500
- OH3LX wrote: Bill , If you set off internal keyer , you can key Orion from Front panel paddle connector. It works like PTT. I do not know what says factory of this ? Yes, but that is what is normally
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00156.html (10,295 bytes)
- 64. RE: [ct-user] Ten-Tec Orion (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 16:12:21 -0500
- Great news for Orion fans!!! Just got the following from Ken K1EA: This is in progress. - Ken <http://us.f412.mail.yahoo.com/ym//ym/Compose?To=anonymous@ailm.pair.com&YY=82917&order=down&sort=date&po
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00164.html (9,074 bytes)
- 65. [TenTec] Heil HC-4 and Orion (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 11:46:44 -0500
- Has anyone been able to successfully use the HC-4 with Orion? I've tried two different elements and many MIC and SP different settings but cannot seem to find any combination which is not clipping th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00202.html (6,971 bytes)
- 66. [TenTec] Heil HC-4 and Orion (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 07:06:53 -0500
- Thanks to all who replied...just a quick followup. Most who were successfully using both HC-4 and HC-5 were using much higher MIC settings than I had been using. I tried adjusting MIC as the new manu
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00249.html (8,809 bytes)
- 67. Re: [TenTec] INRAD Orion roofing filters? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 06:51:36 -0500
- KE5C wrote: has anyone stuck a 2100 Hz and a 400 Hz INRAD in an Orion instead of the TT's? I'm using the Inrad 400 Hz. I chose it because it has a slightly narrower bandwidth (455 Hz vs 500+ Hz) and
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00272.html (8,936 bytes)
- 68. [TenTec] INRAD Orion roofing filters (LONG) (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 10:20:25 -0500
- any of the add on roofing filters helped to copy a station? I'll try answering these questions together with general comments on roofing filters. First, for normal use, I would say that NO additional
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00274.html (11,092 bytes)
- 69. [TenTec] DSP Filter BW (1.366 vs previous) (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 17:02:02 -0500
- Mark Erbaugh wrote: For those of you who have upgraded, does this feature allow you to sharpen the filters beyond what was in previous releases or were previous releases hard coded with 199 taps? N4P
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00335.html (8,303 bytes)
- 70. [TenTec] DSP Filter BW (1.366 vs previous) (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 18:13:48 -0500
- Hmmm...in trying this with the 100-110 Hz DSP filters, I noticed a rather drastic gain change (-18 dB) as I adjusted taps from max to min (199 to 32). There is a very noticeable +6 dB jump from 104 t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00340.html (7,659 bytes)
- 71. [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 06:59:41 -0500
- W5YR wrote: Perhaps a more appropriate question is how many of the major contesters and big multi-multi stations use Ten Tec equipment? Hush George, we don't want them to learn about Orion! In the 20
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00370.html (9,500 bytes)
- 72. [TenTec] Orion in Contests (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 21:43:43 -0500
- K4IA wrote: I still want to know why there are so few Orion reviews on eHam. I put a lot more credence in eHam (not individual reviews but the consensus) than a puff piece in QST. Has QST ever review
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00433.html (9,181 bytes)
- 73. [TenTec] Software releases (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 19:30:35 -0500
- K5UJ wrote: I have a question: How come all you guys rush to load new software releases as soon as they come out? I work in the world of software, where everyone knows that Rule 1 about vendor new ve
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00458.html (7,937 bytes)
- 74. [TenTec] Simple Answer - Why and how is Orion better? (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:13:10 -0500
- W5YR wrote: As a long-time Icom user who is unfamiliar with Ten Tec equipment, any effort on my part to obtain a straightforward technically oriented response to the basic questions of *why* and *how
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00459.html (9,659 bytes)
- 75. [TenTec] Fw: Orion and INRAD filters (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 20:34:56 -0500
- Just to add a note to this, Orion's adjustment range for the 500 Hz position is -400 to +400 Hz, so the additional 150 Hz offset required by the 9000.6 filter should be easily covered as W2VJN state
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00463.html (7,577 bytes)
- 76. [TenTec] CW Audio in Orion (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 06:58:50 -0500
- buzzy raspy CW receive was hard on my ears. Craig, the Orion's audio is the most pleasant I've ever heard on CW, surpassing my previous gold standard, the Kenwood TS-930S. Even Orion's 100 Hz DSP fil
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00478.html (8,427 bytes)
- 77. [TenTec] Simple Answer - Why and how is Orion better (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 09:26:22 -0500
- W9OJ wrote: Is the "few db" in receiver performance worth the considerable extra expense if one is not a contester or dx chaser ? In a word...NO...unless you have a very close neighbor or operate Fie
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00483.html (8,532 bytes)
- 78. Re: [TenTec] Simple Answer - Why and how is Orion better (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:14:52 -0500
- teleprinter broadcasts are going out at 1500 watts I can squeeze the passband down to 300Hz, then use the PBT tuner to shift up 300Hz and my front end is able to receive the very weakest signal on th
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00503.html (10,704 bytes)
- 79. [TenTec] Software releases (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 14:47:24 -0500
- every single case or nearly every single case, when there has been a release of new software for the Orion, the release was followed by a flurry of emails on this reflector from people with problems
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00505.html (8,922 bytes)
- 80. [TenTec] W5YR - Oops, I did it again! (score: 1)
- Author: Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 12:25:06 -0500
- WB8YQJ/6 quoted W5YR: "One word of realism, though: the ORION cannot forever be the best amateur radio transceiver even though it may hold that position at present." Don, before you get too excited,
- /archives//html/TenTec/2003-11/msg00607.html (7,940 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu