- 101. Re: [TenTec] Re: [TenTec]Color change.... (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 18:04:31 -0500
- Black Crackle, brass trim, quiet single conversion tube receiver ... ;-) Bob, KB1CIW
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00089.html (7,682 bytes)
- 102. [TenTec] Scout's back (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 15:15:35 -0500
- Hi all, The Scout is back on the air and some of you were able to pick it out under all the QRM during the Ten Tec Net <g> tnx & 73 Bob, KB1CIW
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-04/msg00233.html (6,485 bytes)
- 103. [TenTec] Scout instability-was Orion direction (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 02:52:40 -0500
- Every now and then someone mentions the Scout "instability problem". What problem ? I agree with Stuart. If the Scout is operated according to directions the frequency stability is more than adequate
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00044.html (8,531 bytes)
- 104. Re: [TenTec] Scout instability-was Orion direction (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 09:33:18 -0500
- Re Scout frequency stability: My manual states the following: The Scout [uses] * one ...microprocessor to accomplish 3 tasks: 1.manage LED display 2.emulate Curtis B keyer 3.frequency lock system (FL
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00060.html (13,239 bytes)
- 105. Re: [TenTec] The Scout was noisy (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 11:06:25 -0500
- Mark, Well...I hate to admit it but you are right. The Scout does have some (phase?) noise but I don't think the Scout's noise is any worse than it's early 90's competition. I operate portable and mo
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00063.html (8,210 bytes)
- 106. Re: [TenTec] Re: Scout instability, revisionism, please stop (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 21:55:45 -0500
- Well this is getting interesting I'm beginning to think that some Scouts do indeed have a real frequency instability problem but I think it may might have more to do with *mechanical stability that w
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00093.html (13,751 bytes)
- 107. Re: [TenTec] Re: Scout instability, revisionism, please stop (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 22:32:42 -0500
- Wow Well I'm really getting an education here. That's a good thing I think. As I've said earlier, at first my Scout worked fine . My friends listening to me told me the CW and SSB on my transmitted s
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00100.html (13,920 bytes)
- 108. Re: [TenTec] The Scout was noisy (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 06:22:42 -0500
- Stuart and everyone, First I want to thank all for their comments. Very interesting to see what different guy's experiences with the Scout have been. Regarding noise. I understand that some of the CP
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00129.html (8,656 bytes)
- 109. Re: [TenTec] The Scout was noisy (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 09:04:57 -0500
- Thanks Duane, Yes, I have read that article and more or less understand it. I am sure that there are several on this list who understand the details left out of the article.For example the TS 50 seem
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00135.html (11,372 bytes)
- 110. Re: [TenTec] Orion, the direction? - was Scout instability (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 09:36:55 -0500
- I guess I'm the one who accidentally de-railed the first discussion so for what it's worth here's my opinion. Question 3: I have encountered several folks (not on this list) who have the opinion that
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00136.html (13,080 bytes)
- 111. Re: [TenTec] The Scout (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2002 21:43:51 -0500
- Geez I'm so stupid, My fingers typed exactly the opposite of what my brain was [Not] thinking. I meant to say that since the Scout had better MDS specs and worse BDR specs(compared to a TS 50) that t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00162.html (11,664 bytes)
- 112. [TenTec] New Ten Tec (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 08:54:15 -0500
- TenTec has a special prevue page of the new top end rig "Orion" that they plan to show at Dayton. I'm not sure if this is a radio or a computer but it looks like fun. Someone in the club should buy o
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00185.html (6,964 bytes)
- 113. Re: [TenTec] New Ten Tec (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2002 12:48:32 -0500
- Apology I have a bad cold and I'm not thinking very straight but still I don't believe I did this. I meant to send this to my local club mail list. Ok I'll get some sleep and will not post anything t
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00195.html (7,792 bytes)
- 114. Re: [TenTec] Jones filter -- Scout v. Delta II (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 23:33:36 -0500
- Kevin I can't tell you what the reason is but I can tell you that the writer of the QST reviews agreed with you. He disliked the Delta II Jone's filter & liked the Scout filter. 73 Bob Stephens KB1CI
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00642.html (8,830 bytes)
- 115. Re: [TenTec] Orion power output (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 07:36:21 -0500
- Are you saying that a 3dB increase in RF will not produce a 3dB increase in audio given a fixed setting on the AF amp ? I assumed the two were related. tnx Bob KB1CIW
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00744.html (9,327 bytes)
- 116. Re: [TenTec] RE: Omni V Fm'ing (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 02:56:04 -0500
- Steve Try operating off the 12 v battery at reduced power and see what happens.Depending on the condition of the battery my Scout was sometimes happier at 30 watts or so when operating on a battery.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00989.html (8,920 bytes)
- 117. Re: [TenTec] RE: Omni V Fm'ing (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 02:56:46 -0500
- Steve Try operating off the 12 v battery at reduced power and see what happens.Depending on the condition of the battery my Scout was sometimes happier at 30 watts or so when operating on a battery.
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-03/msg00990.html (9,570 bytes)
- 118. [TenTec] Re: Ten Tec Scout Problem (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:16:15 -0500
- Hi Mike: Well I have to admit that I got frustrated and did nothing. I did have a couple of "elmers" look at it and they agreed that something was definitely wrong with the rig -not just my installat
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00207.html (7,209 bytes)
- 119. Re: [TenTec] ORION - coming in 2002 (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:44:58 -0500
- The Orion sounds like a rig I would love . Unfortunately, I just don't have enough green <sigh> I don't suppose there is a sufficient market for the rig I want and could almost afford - excellent rec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00398.html (9,685 bytes)
- 120. Re: [TenTec] RE: 516... or why the Orion is more exciting (score: 1)
- Author: robert k stephens <bstephens1@mindspring.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 18:11:49 -0500
- John, Stuart and list I would actually prefer the 516 to cost *more* maybe $1500 . I'd like a small light weight, portable, high performance, low power transceiver with sensitive, low noise floor rec
- /archives//html/TenTec/2002-01/msg00539.html (10,424 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu