Mail Archive Search: <+from:bob@cytanet.com.cy>

Results:

References: [ +from:bob@cytanet.com.cy: 189 ]

Total 189 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TenTec] dit chopper IC-7800 (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 02:05:06 -0500; Tom If you're seeing the problem with the Titan 3 at 28 wpm and other folks using Orion loop keying with Acom and Alpha amplifiers are reporting perfect performance that would strongly suggest you sh; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00468.html (25,607 bytes)
82. Re: [TenTec] Follow up (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 03:13:24 -0500; contest, Tom The WAE CW is a great contest. I've been pretty lucky and taken the number 1 position outside Europe the last two years. I had it in mind to aim for a "hat trick" this year. (I don't kno; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00677.html (8,264 bytes)
83. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 16:58:52 -0500; That's right Lee. It's not as far fetched as it sounds, when you consider that most DX-peditions work split frequency. Bob, 5B4AGN him; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00721.html (8,751 bytes)
84. Re: [TenTec] QSK of QSK and QSK definition (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 02:34:12 -0500; Ken Your observation is correct but.............. The kind of QSK Ten Tec became famous for used to be referred to as FULL QSK to distinguish it from more pedestrian manifestations. As time went on w; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00747.html (12,819 bytes)
85. Re: [TenTec] QSK of QSK and QSK definition (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:36:56 -0500; That sounds very reasonable to me. So far as I can see, there are many discerning operators on this reflector but their likes and dislikes vary. The best advice seems to be, " use what works for you"; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00750.html (11,183 bytes)
86. [TenTec] Orion QSK speed (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 03:59:20 -0500; QSK T/R turnaround on the Orion is certainly slow and I can readily understand why some find it unacceptable. Certainly QRQ QSK is something that Orion currently just doesn't do. In this case QSK is; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00751.html (10,141 bytes)
87. Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 10:06:20 -0500; Tom You have me confused now for sure! When you say you "can work around" the QSK switching issue, does that mean by not bothering with QSK or do you have a cunning work around that hasn't occurred t; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00761.html (10,976 bytes)
88. Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 16:21:37 -0500; Tom Yes I monitored rf output with a seperate receiver. I've sent you two .wav files of what my Orion produces at 60 wpm. Bob works my Orions mean hasn't that.; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00793.html (13,835 bytes)
89. Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 12:36:54 -0500; Tom I have just sent them again. This time with a subject line of "WAV Files." I suspect the previous one might have fallen victim to your Spam defences. I hope this one gets through. 73 Bob, 5B4AGN; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00811.html (16,625 bytes)
90. [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 04:13:21 -0500; The recent discussions concerning abilities of Orion in QRQ have sparked my interest and have prompted me to conduct a few tests. For those that are interested I set out my findings here. Firstly, le; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00865.html (11,064 bytes)
91. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 12:31:26 -0500; Writelog generated the CW using a W5XD Multi-keyer which I rely on for SO2R control and generation of clean stutter free code. The Multi-keyer accepts asynchronous high speed ascii from a com port an; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00872.html (9,817 bytes)
92. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 16:49:19 -0500; Tom Whilst what you have to say here is certainly interesting I am not so sure it is convincing. At this stage I have three files which I believe tell the story with Orion QRQ. These files which are; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00881.html (12,392 bytes)
93. Re: [TenTec] re Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:14:16 -0500; Rob It is important to remember there is no standard for alc circuitry and operation. It is eroneous for a third party amplifier manufactuers to have an alc output and suggest you should use it regar; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00884.html (14,011 bytes)
94. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 17:48:30 -0500; Martin I think you are very probably correct but as my tests show Orion produces acceptable code up to 60 wpm, how much of a problem is this? Certainly for avid fans of 60+ wpm this is a problem but; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00886.html (9,132 bytes)
95. Re: [TenTec] re Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 20:15:07 -0500; Well Ken............I don't think anyone will argue other than Alpha are a specialist amplifier company. This is what they have to say in the 87A Operating Manual: "ALC is a system used in transmitte; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00892.html (12,359 bytes)
96. Re: TT Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 21:16:49 -0500; keyboard up fault same Tom What you are describing here does not reflect my experience, having conducted my own tests on Orion at 60 wpm. Both of my Orions perform in the same way. Both are at 1.371,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00919.html (10,040 bytes)
97. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 04:37:47 -0500; The plug 52 problem arose because a segment of established Omni users expressed a strong preference for sidetone volume to be independent of RX AF gain setting. Ten Tec responded to user pressure by; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00965.html (11,817 bytes)
98. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 09:38:34 -0500; Hi jason I can't disagree with you. I suppose I would have been more correct in saying, QSK operation resulted in audible clicks in the headphones with P52 connected. Like you, I just moved the conne; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00970.html (14,942 bytes)
99. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs.Omni VI+ (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 04:49:43 -0500; It's hard to know where to start but.....if you are considering purchasing an Orion as a back up radio it would be really interesting to know what kind of radio it would be backing up. Bob, 5B4AGN la; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01168.html (7,838 bytes)
100. Re: [TenTec] SO2R with only one TenTec ORION? (score: 1): Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 00:43:09 -0500; Now that's an interesting question. The Orion has two receivers and produces two sets of band data for independent selection of antennas. However, for SO2R you would need to be able to listen on one; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-07/msg00684.html (8,777 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]