Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bob@cytanet.com.cy: 189 ]

Total 189 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TenTec] Orions SO2R in CQ WW RTTY (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 19:08:18 -0500
Alan Many thanks. I've tried what you suggest and you're right, it does retain b/w first set by mode. I can live with that. Did you find this out by chance or is there a reference I've missed in the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00747.html (11,933 bytes)

62. Re: [TenTec] Chasing RTTY DX with the Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 01:58:09 -0500
Duane I think you have answered the question for yourself. Mixing primary and sub RX audio to one TU is messy and produces just that on a screen. With only one TU I would suggest you toggle between l
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00148.html (8,825 bytes)

63. Re: [TenTec] Re: Orion qsk (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 22:29:27 -0500
I'm with you Duane. In a pile up QSK is invaluable. I use QSK 100% of the time when I'm not contesting. I used to use it during contests too but use of SO2R provides greater return and is incompatibl
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00206.html (9,921 bytes)

64. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 11:15:47 -0500
Well I'm really no expert and I think Ten Tec's basis for the decision to deploy roofing filters when DSP b/w is at 75% of roofing b/w would be better explained by them. Having said that, I offer the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00224.html (11,186 bytes)

65. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 03:35:30 -0500
Well...........the one thing that everyone appears to be overlooking here is PBT. If the 2400 Hz roofing filter were to switch in at 2400 Hz DSP then the PBT control would not function. Instead of ad
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00260.html (32,083 bytes)

66. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 03:44:06 -0500
Bill I think this is the first time I have seen something you have written that I disagree with! Single coversion superhets are inompatible with the roofing filter concept. The filters in the K2 are
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00261.html (10,074 bytes)

67. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 04:33:18 -0500
Sinisa You are correct, I am mistaken. Which, I guess, brings us back to the original question about whether switching roofing filters at DSP b/w = 75% roofing b/w is optimum or unecessarily conserva
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00264.html (11,422 bytes)

68. Re: [TenTec] Superhet Receiver Types? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 04:49:17 -0500
All of that is pretty much dead on Ken until the last bit. If a receiver has an IF (Intermediate Frequency) at all, it is not direct conversion. Direct conversion converts in one step from rf to audi
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00265.html (11,962 bytes)

69. [TenTec] When is a filter roofing? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 05:04:51 -0500
Whether a filter is a roofing filter or not isn't really anything to do with where in the receive chain the filter is located or what it's performance specifications are. It is to do with the role it
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00267.html (8,457 bytes)

70. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 06 Aug 2004 05:19:27 -0500
Thanks for the explanation. That seems to pretty much answer everyone's questions concerning roofing filter cut in. Bob, 5B4AGN 75%
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00269.html (11,064 bytes)

71. Re: [TenTec] Orion/DXBase Control Help (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 10:52:21 -0500
Hi Chuck I don't know anything about DXBase but Orion is fixed at 57600 baud. 73 Bob, 5B4AGN to rate is
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00312.html (7,752 bytes)

72. Re: [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:32:05 -0500
Are you sure about that Rick? I'm not saying you're wrong but it's hard to imagine. Or are you refering to a loop circuit which only Ten Tec use, so far as I know. Bob, 5B4AGN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00397.html (8,982 bytes)

73. Re: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 10:37:55 -0500
Bill I'm sorry I didn't hear you. K6VVA wasn't too good even with his kW. We're suffering with a lot of QRN on 20m currently and I guess it buried your 5W. Hopefully it'll be a bit quieter for the WA
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00399.html (8,449 bytes)

74. Re: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here? (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:10:34 -0500
I guess some Ten Tec owners are interested in sharing thoughts on what other vendors are doing. I hope that's not a problem. Bob, 5B4AGN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00407.html (10,561 bytes)

75. [TenTec] Re:Orion for WAE CW (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 12:19:05 -0500
Sinisa I am using 1.371 and have found it to be fine. I'll be risking it in the WAE this weekend anyway. 73 Bob, 5B4AGN, P3F
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00414.html (9,096 bytes)

76. Re: [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:21:41 -0500
Mario 1.370 completely retimed the QSK on Orion. Bob, 5B4AGN
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00440.html (9,297 bytes)

77. Re: [TenTec] dit chopper IC-7800 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:37:56 -0500
Duane I have been running full QSK for almost 30 years. I have never used a keying loop with my amps and I don't have hot switching problems. Currently, I have two Orions, one drives an Alpha 87A and
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00442.html (11,610 bytes)

78. Re: [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 17:08:14 -0500
Duane That's interesting and of course you're right there is a sort of interlock arrangement available on the FT1kMP. I'd forgotten about that and never found the need to use it. (Perhaps it's just t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00443.html (10,671 bytes)

79. Re: [TenTec] dit chopper IC-7800 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:15:55 -0500
Carl I guess if yours works fine that way, mine would too. Then again, it works just fine without needing the loop. Bob, 5B4AGN the of previously which with edge I WPM,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00452.html (14,685 bytes)

80. Re: [TenTec] dit chopper IC-7800 (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:22:39 -0500
This is interesting. As I said the Omni VI+ doesn't work well in QSK with the 87A or the Acom whether loop connected or not and that's due to the way TX Out on the VI+ is timed. If the Orion really w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00454.html (16,735 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu