Mail Archive Search: <+from:bob@cytanet.com.cy>

Results:

References: [ +from:bob@cytanet.com.cy: 189 ]

Total 189 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] Orion Schematics and Service info (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 08:39:33 +0000; John I don't know if you are aware but you can download a full set of schematics from rfsquared.com as a bunch of .pdf files. 73 Bob, 5B4AGN, P3F Anyone heard if TT will have a better set of schemati; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00209.html (8,010 bytes)
142. Re: [TenTec] Re: [Orion] Orion Synthesizer speed (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 07:47:44 +0000; I guess you guys missed my post on this at the end of December. I spoke to Ten Tec about the jerky synthesiser response and they confirmed it to be nothing to do with slow locking of the synthesiser,; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00372.html (10,578 bytes)
143. Re: [TenTec] fuzzy sidetone, tuning freeze (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:30:46 +0000; Buck ORION The fuzzy sidetone came back with 1.367, though it was absent in 1.366. I have spoken to TT about it and they are optimistic they will have it solved for the next release. Meanwhile 1.366; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00513.html (9,236 bytes)
144. Re: [TenTec] How many Orion lists exist ? (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:33:25 +0000; Mike This is not an Orion list but it is an appropriate place for questions related to use of the Orion with Writelog. Seems that way to me anyhow. Bob, 5B4AGN, P3F I am happy to see Orion stuff here; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00515.html (8,796 bytes)
145. Re: [TenTec] How many Orion lists exist ? (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 20:41:37 +0000; Please ignore my daft reply to Mike's mail. My mail sort screwed up and Mike's mail ended up in my Writelog folder. Technology will be great just as soon as I learn how to use it! Bob, 5B4AGN Mike Th; /archives//html/TenTec/2004-01/msg00517.html (9,230 bytes)
146. Re: [TenTec] Re: K2 beats Orion (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 16:21:58 +0000; Well, of course, what matters in the final analysis is how a radio works for you in your shack but mostly its not practical to find that out until you've made the investment. All of this discussion i; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00480.html (12,907 bytes)
147. [TenTec] Vendor wives? (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:26:53 +0000; It seems to me that there is an awful lot written here that is tainted by "vendor's wife" perspective! You know what I mean....."nobody but the wife can be publicly critical of the husband". As a sat; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00512.html (8,382 bytes)
148. Re: [TenTec] ORION---K2 (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:36:04 +0000; K2 cost = $1425 with options comparable to the Orion plus at least 60hrs to build it it at lets say $20/hr, all equals $2625 and no dual receive. Getting pretty close to the cost of an Orion that is; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00513.html (8,114 bytes)
149. Re: [TenTec] Orion --- K2 (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:55:03 +0000; Again ..... comparisons can only be meaningful on current production runs to current production runs. NOT an "obsolete" version to "current" production version. Perhaps in a perfect world you are co; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00514.html (9,397 bytes)
150. Re: [TenTec] Vendor wives? (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 08:58:25 +0000; Wrong list. Sorry this was intended for the Orion list! Bob It seems to me that there is an awful lot written here that is tainted by "vendor's wife" perspective! You know what I mean....."nobody but; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00515.html (8,919 bytes)
151. Re: [TenTec] Re: E-HAM Reviews (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:31:43 +0000; Barry You are absolutely correct IMO. Your shack, your environment and your opinion are what matter in the final analysis. But before we get to the final analysis we need to have a way to decide what; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00620.html (9,883 bytes)
152. Re: [TenTec] RE: K5UJ (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 20:45:25 +0000; It always strikes me as funny the way some folks will scream, scream, scream then declare themselves deaf! In response to your post, The AM operators are very courteous and do not operate everywhere.; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00721.html (7,930 bytes)
153. Re: [TenTec] 1 kHz IMD with Preamp ON/OFF (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 06:43:51 +0000; 1. Why does Orion's performance improve with Preamp ON? 2. Why does K2's performance degrade so much from 5 kHz (88 dB) to 1 kHz (67 dB)? Is there a simple explanation or am I possibly misreading th; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00803.html (8,812 bytes)
154. Re: [TenTec] 1 kHz IMD with Preamp ON/OFF (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 07:02:56 +0000; I guess you're just about right Ken. Seems to me it confirms the 5 previous and invites the sixth. Whatever it is, it's a fistful or a mouthful for sure and P3F is a whole lot easier but only in cont; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00805.html (8,778 bytes)
155. [TenTec] Orion tuning rates (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 14:58:28 +0000; My Orion arrived yesterday evening and is up and running and looking good. Early days yet but there's already a lot I like about this radio. I do have one area that I am struggling with currently. I; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00912.html (9,849 bytes)
156. Re: [TenTec] Orion tuning rates (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:06:46 +0000; Thanks for your comments. I guess I can get used to the 10 Hz step size and 2.5 kHz per revolution for regular use. However, I would much prefer an everyday setting that would give me around 5 kHz pe; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00924.html (8,265 bytes)
157. Re: [TenTec] Orion tuning rates (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 21:39:21 +0000; Pete I too would certainly hate to have a rig that behaves the way you describe. What was it? I'd like to make sure I avoid it! Happy Christmas. Bob, 5B4AGN, P3F I am another of those who prefer the; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00940.html (8,937 bytes)
158. Re: [TenTec] Orion`s 2.4kHz roofing filter (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 07:06:08 +0000; John The roofing filters provided standard in the Orion are all 4 pole units. At this stage I think it unlikely that an increase in the number of poles will produce noticeable benefit but its early d; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00953.html (7,768 bytes)
159. Re: [TenTec] Roofing filters (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 07:22:13 +0000; I believe the term was derived because the roofing filter determines the largest b/w available. Subsequent filtering can narrow b/w and can improve skirt gradient but cannot increase b/w. The first f; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00954.html (9,222 bytes)
160. [TenTec] Orion tuning rates - Further thoughts (score: 1): Author: Bob Henderson <bob@cytanet.com.cy>; Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 21:21:54 +0000; I have for the moment settled on using a step size of 10 Hz, which with the Fast encoder rate set, gives me 2.5 kHz per dial revolution. As several of you suggested, this proves reasonably practical; /archives//html/TenTec/2003-12/msg00962.html (8,937 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]