Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:bob@cytanet.com.cy: 189 ]

Total 189 documents matching your query.

121. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 20:49:17 -0000
Tom Whilst what you have to say here is certainly interesting I am not so sure it is convincing. At this stage I have three files which I believe tell the story with Orion QRQ. These files which are
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00881.html (11,298 bytes)

122. Re: [TenTec] re Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:14:30 -0000
Rob It is important to remember there is no standard for alc circuitry and operation. It is eroneous for a third party amplifier manufactuers to have an alc output and suggest you should use it regar
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00884.html (13,400 bytes)

123. Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (long) (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2004 21:48:30 -0000
Martin I think you are very probably correct but as my tests show Orion produces acceptable code up to 60 wpm, how much of a problem is this? Certainly for avid fans of 60+ wpm this is a problem but
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00886.html (8,749 bytes)

124. Re: [TenTec] re Ten Tec amps and ALC (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:15:20 -0000
Well Ken............I don't think anyone will argue other than Alpha are a specialist amplifier company. This is what they have to say in the 87A Operating Manual: "ALC is a system used in transmitte
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00892.html (12,089 bytes)

125. Re: TT Re: [TenTec] ORION QRQ Performance (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 01:16:29 -0000
keyboard up fault same Tom What you are describing here does not reflect my experience, having conducted my own tests on Orion at 60 wpm. Both of my Orions perform in the same way. Both are at 1.371,
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00919.html (10,217 bytes)

126. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 08:37:35 -0000
The plug 52 problem arose because a segment of established Omni users expressed a strong preference for sidetone volume to be independent of RX AF gain setting. Ten Tec responded to user pressure by
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00965.html (11,544 bytes)

127. Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ firmware rev. (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2004 13:38:39 -0000
Hi jason I can't disagree with you. I suppose I would have been more correct in saying, QSK operation resulted in audible clicks in the headphones with P52 connected. Like you, I just moved the conne
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00970.html (15,086 bytes)

128. Re: [TenTec] Orion vs.Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 08:49:41 -0000
It's hard to know where to start but.....if you are considering purchasing an Orion as a back up radio it would be really interesting to know what kind of radio it would be backing up. Bob, 5B4AGN la
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg01168.html (7,493 bytes)

129. Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 21:41:32 -0000
No.......... Dynamic range can only be measured with a spacing attached to it. Traditionally it was 20 kHz but is frequently now measured at 5 kHz. That's why roofing filters can improve dynamic rang
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00031.html (9,860 bytes)

130. Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me - more (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 21:56:56 -0000
On the other hand Ken you are right. Introducing filters ahead of the A to D convertor will not improve A-D convertor dynamic range. The dynamic range of the A to D convertor will stay exactly as it
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00032.html (7,641 bytes)

131. Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me - more (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 06:02:44 -0000
Hi Ken Nothing to disagree with there, though a little to add. Poor design at any stage in the signal path is going to prejudice dynamic range. More and more folks now accept, that it's close-in dyna
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00043.html (12,316 bytes)

132. Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 15:50:15 -0000
snip snip This will be an interesting one when the full story is told. Certainly so far as the FT1kMP is concerned. The roofing filter from Inrad has a 4 kHz b/w which makes quite a good choice for S
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00058.html (9,688 bytes)

133. Re: [TenTec] Re: [Ten-Tec] Alas, not for me (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 22:09:34 -0000
Hi Joe No...the Sherwood data is for the stock FT1kMPs. So far as I'm aware there isn't yet any independent data at 2 kHz for the MPs with the Inrad roofing filter. Bob, 5B4AGN so kHz over enough pri
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00071.html (12,165 bytes)

134. Re: [TenTec] Sweep display freezing on Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2004 05:18:05 -0000
Eric I don't use the sweep display but I have checked the phenomena you describe below and can confirm this occurs with my Orions too. I suggest you send a report to ditsnbits about it so it can be i
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00109.html (9,501 bytes)

135. Re: [TenTec] Tired of Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 07:11:57 -0000
May God bless freedom of the written word and the delete key. Bob, 5B4AGN the least however, _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00179.html (8,105 bytes)

136. Re: [TenTec] Tired of Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:27:46 -0000
As Scott points out, there are a lot of happy Orion owners out there. I am one of those people. I bought my first Orion at the end of last year and was so delighted with it, I added a second one to m
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00190.html (13,944 bytes)

137. Re: [TenTec] Orion reflector discussions (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:33:16 -0000
the Rick I haven't experienced the display darkening problem on either of my Orions and in July/August it does get a little hot out here. Some days above 100F. So, I guess the problem doesn't affect
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00191.html (8,123 bytes)

138. Re: [TenTec] new owner Orion (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 23:20:07 -0000
Fellas I down loaded the manual from the Ten Tec web-site before I ordered my Orion. I enjoyed reading it. I took delivery of an Orion in December and have hardly felt the need to refer to the manual
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00282.html (13,282 bytes)

139. Re: [TenTec] Orion bug video (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 05:25:11 -0000
Martin I have tried to download the file but for some reason I'm unable to do so currently. Due no doubt to some glitch in the internet ether somewhere. However, I am pretty sure I know what to expec
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00337.html (8,512 bytes)

140. [TenTec] Ten Tec 219 filter (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 05:38:01 -0000
I am looking for a Ten Tec 219 filter, 250 Hz b/w at 9 MHz I/F. If anyone has one surplus to requirements I would be interested in buying it. Of course the seller will need to be prepared to send it
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00338.html (7,391 bytes)

Current List: 121 - 140
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]
This search system is powered by Namazu