Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:barry.n1eu@gmail.com: 1936 ]

Total 1936 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TenTec] SSB recieve audio? (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 16:59:54 +0000
carrier oscillators _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00572.html (8,920 bytes)

22. Re: [TenTec] SSB recieve audio? (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 19:38:46 +0000
pure conjecture on my part - only one of the two oscillators (either USB or LSB) should effect cw, and the effect would probably be to shift the cw offset/sidetone, but I don't honestly know. I no lo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00579.html (10,801 bytes)

23. Re: [TenTec] orion problems (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 21:03:38 +0000
No, they finally sorted that one out. The Orion uses a slightly unique ssb-encoding algorithm in the DSP and will sound slightly wierd if you don't receive the signal on another Orion. This will be f
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00652.html (8,552 bytes)

24. Re: [TenTec] orion problems (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 00:33:16 +0000
Dumb question Tommy, but why didn't you give up on the amp instead of giving up on the radio? Orion works fb now with Alpha & Acom amps. You could have relegated the TT amp to backup role until the k
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-05/msg00670.html (9,317 bytes)

25. Re: [TenTec] ORION, THE TERRIBLE 12 (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 06:44:29 -0400
We already have one. Perhaps the subscribers need to be a bit more thick skinned themselves. For whatever reason, the Orion negative posts seem to amuse me more than bother me lately. 73, Barry N1EU
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00004.html (7,290 bytes)

26. Re: [TenTec] ORION, THE TERRIBLE 12 (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 09:27:48 -0400
What a hoot. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00012.html (7,438 bytes)

27. Re: [TenTec] Annual review of the Orion (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2005 11:05:35 -0400
It tells us nothing until you do a careful comparison of operating behavior in native mode vs. N4PY mode and uncover the differences for anyone to repeat. Ja? 73, Barry N1EU _________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00020.html (8,046 bytes)

28. Re: [TenTec] Coaxial RF Choke (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 11:44:59 +0000
A more thorough treatment at http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/airbalun.html A more thorough treatment at http://www.k1ttt.net/technote/airbalun.html - A 1:1 coaxial balun with excellent choking reactanc
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00140.html (8,024 bytes)

29. Re: [TenTec] Flex-Radio compared to Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 20:37:59 +0000
What's wrong with this picture? ARRL measured Orion as 120dB BDR at 1Khz spacing on p19 of the expanded review. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.c
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-06/msg00246.html (7,948 bytes)

30. Re: [TenTec] Moderate moderation perhaps? (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 10:03:26 -0400
I believe Jim previously explained that the "auction" trigger is automatic - that he doesn't personally have time to comb through each and every post, etc. Let's not make a big deal out of this, plea
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00004.html (8,975 bytes)

31. Re: [TenTec] ORION roofing filter ? (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 22:26:19 +0000
Yes. Congrats on the new rig! 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00109.html (7,500 bytes)

32. Re: [TenTec] Orion and UPDATE mode. (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 22:32:14 +0000
Wow, that's pretty wide. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00112.html (7,938 bytes)

33. Re: [TenTec] ARRL Review of FT9000 (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2005 02:28:41 +0000
Huh? Does not appear to be worth 1.0 Orions. Immediate headscratchers for me was inability to assign both receivers to same vfo (no diversity reception capability) and limited ssb rx audio bandwith,
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00144.html (8,565 bytes)

34. Re: [TenTec] Force 12 vertical dipoles used with my TT Scout (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:03:09 -0400
If I recall, they charge over $500 for that 40M vertical. Yikes! We need a homebrew version. How difficult/expensive could it be to fashion something similar? 73, Barry N1EU _________________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00361.html (13,507 bytes)

35. Re: [TenTec] Omni six-- heat related IF gain problem (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 15:16:47 -0400
Actually, this wasn't an uncommon topic a few years back. Personally, I found that my PBT settings were shifted dramatically during cw contesting due to internal heat buildup. I used an external fan
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00399.html (8,360 bytes)

36. Re: [TenTec] 7/20/05: Ten-Tec announces ORION II (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 13:41:01 -0400
Orion I owners need to take a deep breath and chill. It's only the control processor that has changed, not the dsp processor as far as the announcement goes. Until the dust settles, I'm not convinced
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00551.html (13,048 bytes)

37. Re: [TenTec] Ver 2.0 is the key issue (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:11:19 -0400
My logic reaches the opposite conclusion. They do want to test v2 on the Orion I and the v2 firmware release will not be tied to the Orion II release. How about a 24 hour hiatus from further assumpti
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00688.html (7,898 bytes)

38. Re: [Orion] New Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:51:18 +0000
I'm just not getting the instant devaluation of the Orion. The O2 version is $700 MORE expensive and its introduction apparently guarantees several additional years of continued support for the O1 fi
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00717.html (7,075 bytes)

39. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 10:05:15 -0400
Mr. Spock, once again you make a presumption I differ with. In fact, I'm willing to bet you're logic is illogical.. 73, Barry N1EU _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-07/msg00783.html (8,940 bytes)

40. Re: [TenTec] Remove from e-mail list (score: 1)
Author: Barry Gross <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:09:02 +0000
No, you have to do it yourself. Go to http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec scroll to the bottom of the page fill in your email address and click "unsubscribe or edit options" On the fo
/archives//html/TenTec/2005-08/msg00255.html (7,244 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu