Thanks, Barry - another reason to return to V1 software, I guess. I keep saying I'm going to do it, and it never seems to happen! 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com FWIW, for 4
No, this is just one more reason to move back to 1.37x level firmware. Besides, what's the problem? The nice thing about owning an Orion I is the ability to run 1.x or 2.x firmware. At this point, I
I don't know, my Omni VI+ worked great with the Ten-Tec (Network Science) crystal ladder filters. Especially the 250Hz 2nd IF (6.3 Mhz) filter - it's amazing in removing noise. 73, Duane Duane Calvin
"H" range slugs must be low-volume production these days. Wow, $155! 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com --Original Message-- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-
Can you describe what kind of problem you're having? Can't find a match? There's not much I can't match with mine, although I've found a few that I can't quite bring down to 1:1 SWR. 73, Duane Duane
You really don't think they single-sourced a critical part of any defense systems, do you? 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com --Original Message-- From: tentec-bounces@contesti
Except most routers are set for "0" in the third octet. 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com --Original Message-- From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@conte
Agreed, but the radio is most likely getting assigned an IP via DHCP in the router, and most folks don't change the default settings. Then again, maybe I'm way off on this - I don't have an Omni VII
I'm trying to think of a modern Ten-Tec radio that doesn't use a relay for T/R switching, and can't think of one! 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com --Original Message-- From:
The Omni VI/VI+ used a reed relay for T/R switching, even tho they may have used diodes in the circuit. Remember all the complaints about how some folks could hear their relay and others couldn't? :-
Merle, I've been struggling with the "overdriven" audio sound ever since installing 2.062a. I also hope they get to this soon. The only solution I've found is to run both the NB and NR at between 1 a
There were a couple others of us who suggested this same thing. 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com It may go against ham culture, but I suggested (long ago) that TT should sell
I don't think we were talking about open-sourcing. This comes up every now and again. I don't believe TT will go for that as they believe they have considerable intellectual property tied up in it an
Dave - I can't tell you the comparative output of the VI+ vs the Argo, but I can tell you that running the audio out (line level) from the VI+ in my shack was more than sufficient to drive an HAL DXP
There were at least two levels of firmware on the Omni VI+, but I don't recall the differences- they were very minor. Neither fixed the problem I found (XIT offset is off by 300 Hz or so when you try
I've used a 238 or 238B for several years now. It works great, and got great reviews from the QST comparative review a few years ago. 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com --Origi
Art, I used the 2-wire ICOM interface with mine and it played really well. I built the interface that is in the (1991?) QST magazine instead of buying the expensive ICOM unit. Supported up to 4 rigs
Art, I remember my VI+ had most of the gain in the first 90 degrees of rotation (from 7 o'clock to 10 o'clock, with the latter being VERY loud.) I think your headsets may be adding to the problem - m
Steve, I started with a HAL DXP-38 hardware TNC on the Orion and it ran FB. Last year I switched to a microHam DigiKeyer, and run it with MMTTY on FSK and it also works FB (I also run it in PSK31 and
Is your Sony a plasma or an LED? 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas www.ac5aa.com Rick, you may have got mine! I had purchased a similar model from Panasonic and tried everything to reduce t