Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ac5aa@juno.com: 606 ]

Total 606 documents matching your query.

381. Re: [TenTec] OT: Software Testing (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 13:57:57 -0500
Which leads to Rule #1 of all test engineers: 1. What error conditions do you think the programmer never thought of? Start testing there. 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas _________________
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00383.html (7,727 bytes)

382. Re: [TenTec] rcvr/no audio (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:27:58 -0500
My Orion has run faultlessly in several contests now - both RTTY and CW. I don't do much SSB contesting, so haven't tried that yet. An Orion I used last fall occasionally had the problem described by
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00550.html (13,292 bytes)

383. Re: [TenTec] rcvr/no audio (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:25:33 -0500
I tend to leave the amp off during contests due to the neighbors. I've had no problems with the Alpha 99 on the QSK loop so far, but I haven't had a lot of operating with it (work has been very time
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00560.html (17,003 bytes)

384. Re: [TenTec] rcvr/no audio (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:44:07 -0500
Hi Tommy, We've talked about this before. Yes, it is in the keying loop, and works fine. I don't remember the specifics of your problem, but at one point I was going to try to reproduce them here. I
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00572.html (20,922 bytes)

385. Re: [TenTec] 6N2 (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:41:28 -0500
Paul, I just sold mine. It was an excellent radio. The controls are not as 'slick' as the JA rigs. I liked it a lot - especially that I could run 6m on my untuned-on-6m G5RV Jr., and it would still p
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00607.html (8,422 bytes)

386. Re: [TenTec] open source (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:37:21 -0500
The way I understand it, if someone reverse engineers the code, and then uses *any* of the algorithms or code sequences anywhere in his "new" code, he has violated copyright - assuming TT copyrights
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00661.html (14,451 bytes)

387. Re: [TenTec] New firmware for the Orion... (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 19:33:20 -0500
Eric and reflector, I have the unpleasant task of reporting that I have validated Eric's bug report - my first SSB contest with my Orion (Feb '04 manufacture). I ran the DVK for the first hour of the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00693.html (12,603 bytes)

388. Re: [TenTec] New firmware for the Orion... (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:15:03 -0500
I know, bad form to reply to your own posting, but more data: - problem only occurs when Speech Processor is engaged - fail symptom (pulsing xmit audio) is not 100% repeatable, and can be stopped by
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00696.html (15,365 bytes)

389. Re: [TenTec] New firmware for the Orion... (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:36:11 -0500
This is a follow-up to my posting of a bug discovered on my Orion (very like Eric's) with the pulsing audio on playback of SSB recorded messages, and highly distorted TX audio with SP on and voice ke
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00776.html (8,299 bytes)

390. Re: [TenTec] Re Please tell me about the TT Omni VI+ (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 22:58:22 -0500
I'll add one more voice re: RFI and Omni VI+'s. My shack is very RF rich (1 KW into a wire ~15' overhead.). I had zero problems with the Omni VI+, although I have some other equipment in the shack th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-09/msg00841.html (9,325 bytes)

391. Re: [TenTec] amp/tuner advice needed... (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2004 21:08:30 -0500
As one who has owned both the Centaur and the Centurion, I'd recommend the Centurion. You'll run 600w with ease on it, and the fan noise is almost non-existant. I also felt the component quality of t
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00036.html (9,317 bytes)

392. Re: [TenTec] Extra Class Licensing (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:58:28 -0500
I usually don't respond to these discussions, and I don't want to start a firestorm, but I have to disagree with this idea. Ham radio is *both* a technical and a communications hobby. The reason ther
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00093.html (12,105 bytes)

393. Re: [TenTec] INRAD 762 filter (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 23:13:29 -0500
I've used it on RTTY (FSK). Seems to work fine. (I use the #352 kit version that preceeded the #762.) In general, I like this filter a lot, and have it in the 1 KHz slot. 73, Duane On Thu, 21 Oct 200
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-10/msg00328.html (7,231 bytes)

394. Re: [TenTec] My new Orion and a question... (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 10:42:24 -0600
Eric, Now that you mention it, I had a couple of encoders that were stiffer than the others on my Orion when it was new. Either they have all smoothed out through use, or I've gotten so used to it th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00014.html (9,976 bytes)

395. Re: [TenTec] Re: FULL QSK? What it is (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:31:01 -0600
Of course, Steve was stating the ultimate goal. Almost all implementations are going to fall short of it, but should aim at it. I'm in agreement with him. I enjoy conversational CW, and, even when wo
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00262.html (9,388 bytes)

396. Re: [TenTec] QSK with QSK-5PC (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:32:50 -0600
Depends on the amplifier's relay close delay time, doesn't it? That assumes you're using the QSK loop and the amp relay is keying the rig. So, in this case, it would be a fixed value depending on the
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00263.html (9,757 bytes)

397. Re: [TenTec] FS: Tentec Omni VI+ 564 (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 17:08:06 -0600
Hey John! Wish I weren't in dept up to my eyes in guitar stuff or I'd consider this one. Has a familiar ring to it. hi! Hope things are good with you. 73, Duane (have a great Thanksgiving and Christm
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00437.html (9,452 bytes)

398. Re: [TenTec] Orion and digital modes? (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 12:25:24 -0600
As an alternative for RTTY, running in the FSK mode allows for very easy filter manipulation, and no issues with RF on the audio signal. Of course, it requires an external TNC. Works terrific with my
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00469.html (9,212 bytes)

399. Re: [TenTec] Question regarding Omni VI+ on SSB (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 17:36:09 -0600
Jeff - I always got great results with my Heil ProSet, using the more natural sounding HC-5 mic element. The TT 705 also got good reports. On the Heil, I ran both the mic gain and the processing at a
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00583.html (12,251 bytes)

400. Re: [TenTec] Omni 6+ rx dead (score: 1)
Author: Duane A Calvin <ac5aa@juno.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 18:31:53 -0600
Hi Jim, VI+'s go for anywhere from $1300 - 1500 depending on condition, filters included, etc. If it has the TCXO that will make it worth a little more (or will help it sell faster). Mine went for $1
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-11/msg00640.html (14,725 bytes)

Current List: 381 - 400
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20]
This search system is powered by Namazu