Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ac5aa@juno.com: 606 ]

Total 606 documents matching your query.

141. [TenTec] Spec comparison of Ten-Tec Pegasus VS Kachina 505DSP (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 19:24:30 -0500
The answer was provided in response to a question posted on the reflector. It appears to me (a rabid Ten-Tec fan) to be very objective and directly to the point, regardless of it's being provided by
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00159.html (8,445 bytes)

142. [TenTec] Aligning Frequency Display O 6+ (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 16:10:01 -0500
That's odd, mine appears to be very close, if not dead on. Did I get a broken one? :-) 73, Duane AC5AA Duane A. Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas ac5aa@juno.com -or- ac5aa@earthlink.net Day: dacalvin@us.ib
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-08/msg00278.html (9,446 bytes)

143. [TenTec] eme: Omni D vs vi+ DSP, wondering... (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 13:40:21 -0500
When I first started with DSP on my IC-765, I *could* copy signals with the original Timewave DSP-9 that I couldn't copy without it. This was with or without the ICOM 500 Hz filters cascaded. It woul
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00059.html (8,430 bytes)

144. [TenTec] AGC: ON or OFF Survey (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 15:07:27 -0500
I use NR on CW almost all the time - the difference in readability of many signals is very noticeable. But, I like to chase the ones down in the noise - I almost never tune to S5 or over as they tend
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00064.html (13,008 bytes)

145. [TenTec] Pegasus - the litmus test (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 1999 11:23:18 -0500
I'd say quite the contrary. I work in the computer industry and use computers all day long at work and at home. I test the latest stuff - things most users will never see or use, and I have somewhat
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-07/msg00203.html (9,741 bytes)

146. [TenTec] TT vs. INRAD Filters (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 21:21:11 -0500
Forget the advice about the Timewave DSP. It will NOT do what crystal filters will for you. It only adds selectivity on the resultant audio. I really like DSP (and both the Omni's DSP and my JPS NIR-
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-06/msg00216.html (12,163 bytes)

147. [TenTec] And Another Thing! (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Sat, 1 May 1999 17:37:23 -0500
They were also at Ham-Com in Dallas either 2 or 3 years ago. Kenwood was almost a no-show for the last couple of years, one year just handing out literature - not a single rig in sight. 73, Duane AC5
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00015.html (10,685 bytes)

148. [TenTec] Dell/Gateway comparison (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Sun, 2 May 1999 13:30:16 -0500
Yeah, you forgot the automatic QSO-maker that would watch the packet and work the stations for you while you're gone. Then there would be the automatic award-mailer that would mail off for the awards
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00052.html (9,584 bytes)

149. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 21:02:15 -0500
Since we're all guessing until some of us see it (so glad I chose this year to go to Dayton!), who wants to venture a guess as to its position vs the Omni. If the model number means anything, it's lo
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00258.html (8,596 bytes)

150. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Wed, 12 May 1999 21:33:05 -0500
At the risk of opening up this discussion again, NO, I also hope it's a standalone rig. I have no use for another computer in the shack. No mouse button for me instead of a tuning knob! But, hey, I d
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00261.html (10,486 bytes)

151. [TenTec] DSP Rom Version of Omni 6+ (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Thu, 13 May 1999 12:12:59 -0500
No update (why?), and no update to firmware either to fix the "REV" error if XIT is on, or the lack of XIT/RIT unique per VFO (which is advertised.) 73, Duane AC5AA Duane A. Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Tex
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00274.html (8,006 bytes)

152. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (Duane A. Calvin)
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 19:27:27 -0400
The 6N2 is black with green LED digits. It does NOT look like the Omni series... 73, Duane Duane Calvin, AC5AA Austin, TX (But on vacation in Cincinnati after Dayton...) -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.con
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00367.html (8,635 bytes)

153. [TenTec] 6N2 Multimode Rig (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (Duane A. Calvin)
Date: Sun, 16 May 1999 19:34:02 -0400
The original (I think) "6N2" was the Johnson Viking/Valiant 6N2 and/or their "6N2 Thunderbolt" linear amp. The TT 6N2 has some exciting possibilities, from what I could see, and I hope that it includ
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00368.html (7,800 bytes)

154. [TenTec] Dayton Photos (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 20:31:55 -0500
I have a couple photos of TenTec's new radios on my web site. Check the Dayton'99 page at: http://home.earthlink.com/~ac5aa/dayton_99.htm I should apologize for the photos - with my little point/shoo
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00464.html (7,436 bytes)

155. [TenTec] Fw: Dayton Photos - bad link (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Fri, 21 May 1999 22:36:51 -0500
Sorry - I keep doing this. The real link is: http://home.earthlink.net/~ac5aa/dayton_99.htm .net, not .com - gotta get that through my head . . . 73, Duane Duane A. Calvin, AC5AA Austin, Texas ac5aa@
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00466.html (8,175 bytes)

156. [TenTec] Omni 6 passband shifts with heat??? (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 09:13:28 -0500
Hi Barry, Heard you once in the contest - you were doing S&P and nailed someone either just after or just before I did. Your signal sounded FB. I'm curious, are you running with a low sidetone? I use
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00533.html (9,531 bytes)

157. [TenTec] Omni 6 passband shifts with heat??? (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Mon, 31 May 1999 14:57:19 -0500
Gee, and what does an IC-781 cost compared to an Omni-VI? Then add a $300 DSP on top of the 781 . . . methinks thou protesteth too loudly! 73, Duane (By point of comparison, I moved from IC-765 to Om
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-05/msg00537.html (10,485 bytes)

158. [TenTec] Kachina comparison? (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 1999 20:24:25 -0600
Hi Gary, I saw the Kachina at Dallas HamCom last year, and have to admit that I'm not one who favors the PC-based radios. I guess the GUI/keyboard/mouse approach doesn't lend itself to what I think w
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-03/msg00017.html (9,073 bytes)

159. [TenTec] Tuning up with a dummy load ? (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 00:24:12 -0600
Tuning up on a dummy load is good practice for a tube rig that needs "tuning up". For a broadband rig like the Omni's, to tune a long wire antenna, tuning on the dummy will always produce an out-of-t
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-03/msg00117.html (9,864 bytes)

160. [TenTec] SCOUT Questions (score: 1)
Author: ac5aa@juno.com (ac5aa@juno.com)
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 20:38:24 -0600
So, what would you recommend in the $600 price range, new, for mobile work, Walt? Surely not the IC-706 with an RX as wide as a barn door and non-existent QSK and so many buried menus that it's a won
/archives//html/TenTec/1999-03/msg00183.html (13,468 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu