Mail Archive Search: <+from:SFIKE@twa.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:SFIKE@twa.com: 19 ]

Total 19 documents matching your query.

1. [TenTec] 526 6m/2m rig (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 1 Dec 1999 18:57:13 LOC; Anyone know what the current status is on the yet to be released 526 6m/2m DSP all-mode rig? My gosh, here it is December already and I first read about the rig way back in February!!! Wonder what th; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00021.html (7,183 bytes)
2. [TenTec] QST (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 13 Dec 1999 17:40:42 LOC; Anyone got the January 2000 issue of QST yet? 73 Scott,kc0bus -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contest; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00228.html (6,440 bytes)
3. [TenTec] Favor (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 15 Dec 1999 17:20:26 LOC; I need someone with web access to voluntarily do me a favor that would be greatly appreciated! I don't have web access...... It is totally unrelated to Ten Tec. Thanks in advance for any helpers! 73; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00285.html (6,591 bytes)
4. [TenTec] Favor done (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 15 Dec 1999 19:14:35 LOC; Thanks for all the kind offers to help me out with my favor. It has been accomplished already!!!!!(Very expeditously I must add too!) Glad to see so many nice, helpfull people on this reflector! Than; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-12/msg00286.html (6,603 bytes)
5. [TenTec] Pegasus (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 5 Nov 1999 16:17:03 LOC; Does anybody know if the Pegasus has been reviewed by QST yet? I'm not a member of the ARRL so I don't get QST. And if not, do you know which issue it is scheduled to be reviewed in? Thanks, 73 Scott; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00115.html (7,637 bytes)
6. [TenTec] Pegasus take two (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 5 Nov 1999 17:46:23 LOC; Well it looks as though there is an ever so slight chance that I might be getting a Pegasus after all. I had originally been saving up for a Corsair II station but todays surprise bonus check from my; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00118.html (7,219 bytes)
7. [TenTec] Undeliverable Mail (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 9 Nov 1999 20:57:20 LOC; ** Forwarding note from SMTP --VMIDS 11/09/99 20:56 ** == To: <tentec@contesting.com> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 20:56:49 LOC From: <SMTP@VMTCP03.TWA.COM> To: <SFIKE@VMIDS> Subject: Undeliverable Mail VM; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00203.html (7,725 bytes)
8. [TenTec] Overhaul (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 14 Nov 1999 20:16:13 LOC; Anybody know how much Ten-Tec charges to have a rig given an overall tune-up alignment with a PTO rebuild to bring the rig back to within factory spec? And what does all the servicing include and wha; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00289.html (6,883 bytes)
9. [TenTec] Newbie question (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 17 Nov 1999 18:37:29 LOC; Can somebody explain to me how the modes PSK31/FSK31 work? 73, Scott,KC0BUS -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com Administrative requests: tentec-R; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00320.html (6,744 bytes)
10. [TenTec] other ten tec reflectors (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 29 Nov 1999 18:58:24 LOC; Does anybody know about any other Ten*Tecreflectors other than this one? Thanks in advance! 73 Scott,KC0BUS -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contesting.com A; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00552.html (6,750 bytes)
11. [TenTec] QSK question (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 30 Nov 1999 15:35:45 LOC; Can anyone tell me if Ten*Tecs trademark, silky-smooth QSK has been on every rig that Ten*Tec has ever made (including the first Power-Mite in 1969), or is it a relatively new feature that is only on; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00560.html (7,363 bytes)
12. [TenTec] used list (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 30 Nov 1999 21:30:28 LOC; Can someone forward me a copy of the last usedlist that Ten Tec posted. I accidentally deleted mine. Thanks! 73 Scott -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm Submissions: tentec@contes; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-11/msg00569.html (6,513 bytes)
13. [TenTec] model numbers (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 19 Oct 1999 18:54:15 LOC; Hi all, I just joined the list today so sorry if this question has been asked before. Does anybody know how to decode Ten Tecs model numbers? Or are they just random numbers pulled out of the air and; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00481.html (6,861 bytes)
14. [TenTec] rig recommendations (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 19 Oct 1999 21:54:58 LOC; Hi all, I am looking to buy my first HF rig and I would like to buy a good used Ten Tec rig of some sort. I'm not flushed with mounds of cash and would like stay as close to $500 as possible. I am lo; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00493.html (7,528 bytes)
15. [TenTec] New (to me) HF rig (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 20 Oct 1999 20:10:08 LOC; Just wanted to thank everyone who gave me suggestions for my first HF rig! Most of you advocated a Corsair I, II or an Omni C. This has helped me tremendously in narrowing down my choices.If anyone c; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00538.html (6,906 bytes)
16. [TenTec] How to read specs. (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 27 Oct 1999 17:10:24 LOC; Hi folks, I need someone who knows how to read technical specifications to show me how to interpret them. I have a couple of transcievers I'm comparing the specs. against eachother and trying to deci; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00715.html (7,954 bytes)
17. [TenTec] newbie question (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 28 Oct 1999 22:25:37 LOC; I am trying to decide if it is better for a transciever to NOT have a general coverage receiver. There seems to be a couple of schools of thought on this. Some say the rig will perform better on the; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00762.html (7,290 bytes)
18. [TenTec] Original Delta (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 29 Oct 1999 15:42:19 LOC; Hi all, I have been reading a lot about the Scout and Delta II lately on this reflector. I was just wondering what some of your opinions are on the original Delta ( I call it the Delta I ) were. Is t; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00813.html (7,570 bytes)
19. [TenTec] Inbody Address Error Notification (score: 1): Author: SFIKE@twa.com (SFIKE@twa.com); Date: 29 Oct 1999 21:21:35 LOC; ** Forwarding note from SYSADMIN--TWAMS01 10/29/99 21:20 ** To: SFIKE --VMIDS ** If that is the case, why not start designing its replacement now for when the Scout finially gets retired. Since you s; /archives//html/TenTec/1999-10/msg00831.html (7,453 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 19
Page: [1]