Mail Archive Search: <+from:Rsoifer@aol.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:Rsoifer@aol.com: 310 ]

Total 310 documents matching your query.

141. Re: [TenTec] Suggestions please (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 13:34:36 -0500 (EST); Jerry, Iowa may be a worse environment for ice than New Jersey where I was at the time, but I had no problems with mechanical strength. Of course, my feedline run was only 50 feet, pretty much straig; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00241.html (10,698 bytes)
142. Re: [TenTec] Any Orion II diversity users out there? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 19:19:24 -0500 (EST); Hi Barry, I'm not a frequent user, but I do use it on our weekly 20m club net (also my only regular venture onto SSB). The two antennas I use are a vertical and a 130-foot long wire. Sometimes it hel; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-01/msg00378.html (7,396 bytes)
143. Re: [TenTec] orion beta firmware (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 13:32:44 -0500 (EST); Steve, Do you mean 2.041XT, or is there a more recent one that I'm not familiar with? As for 2.041XT. I liked the waterfall display but didn't like the NR, which is better in 2.044A. 73 Ray W2RS. In; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00166.html (7,293 bytes)
144. [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 17:00:57 -0500 (EST); Hi John, I hear you about the 566. V2.044A is very good, but please don't forget about the waterfall display. I'm not at all convinced I would want a high speed sweep board, but I did like the old wa; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00336.html (7,840 bytes)
145. Re: [TenTec] Orion II (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 10:33:26 -0500 (EST); In 2.041XT, the waterfall was not instead of the sweep display, it was a menu-driven option. If you would rather have the sweep display, you could choose that. What I liked about the waterfall was th; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00358.html (9,346 bytes)
146. [TenTec] Orion II transmit equalization (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 10:11:21 -0500 (EST); John, I operated my Orion II this weekend in the AWA's AM QSO Party, and noticed that the transmit equalization is quite a bit different between AM and SSB. On SSB, it sounded best when flat (0 dB),; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00393.html (7,000 bytes)
147. Re: [TenTec] Orion II transmit equalization (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:31:53 -0500 (EST); John, Further to my earlier email, I ran some more tests, listening to myself on an external receiver (actually, an Argonaut V). The difference in equalization between AM and SSB did not show up ther; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00397.html (7,133 bytes)
148. Re: [TenTec] Orion II transmit equalization (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:43:21 -0500 (EST); Ron, It sounds that way to me too. Hope T-T includes the monitor in their next revision. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 2/21/2011 8:34:56 P.M. GMT Standard Time, ronc@sonic.net writes: There is a dis; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00408.html (10,108 bytes)
149. Re: [TenTec] Orion on AM (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 18:45:34 -0500 (EST); Bob, It is a form of controlled carrier, but the Orions already have great RF speech processors built in. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 2/21/2011 11:31:18 P.M. GMT Standard Time, k4bg@planters.net w; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00409.html (7,173 bytes)
150. Re: [TenTec] KPA 500 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 19:22:24 -0500 (EST); Hi George, Yes, my experience with solid state amps is also that they can't take abuse as well as a tube amp can. Tube amps are also better value for money. For those who really need no-tune bandswit; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00476.html (12,908 bytes)
151. Re: [TenTec] pr40 (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 03:47:49 -0500 (EST); I don't do that much SSB but am very pleased with the 707 Regal. It needs more gain than condenser mikes (HW gain 12 dB, MIC 55 with my voice) but it sounds great. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 2/26; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00550.html (13,195 bytes)
152. Re: [TenTec] Orion II sweep display? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:44:49 -0500 (EST); Tim, I don't know what you mean by "freezes," but when I turn the VFO knob the display doesn't move for about one second. That's enough for me to tune close to the desired signal, if not right on it.; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00556.html (8,464 bytes)
153. Re: [TenTec] Orion II sweep display? (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:23:29 -0500 (EST); Lee, Sounds good to me. Bring it back, along with the waterfall! 73 Ray In a message dated 2/26/2011 4:17:46 P.M. GMT Standard Time, kc9cdt@aol.com writes: Ray, He is talking about the nice feature (; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00560.html (10,338 bytes)
154. Re: [TenTec] OII V2.044A (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 11:57:35 -0500 (EST); Lee, I hardly ever use the AN (rather useless on CW) but I find the NR MUCH better than 2.041XT. Not much difference from 2.039d, though. 73 Ray W2RS In a message dated 2/26/2011 4:44:48 P.M. GMT Sta; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00567.html (10,920 bytes)
155. Re: [TenTec] OII V2.044A (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 12:45:33 -0500 (EST); Lee, Interesting. The only Hallicrafters receivers I have here are an S-38 and an S-38C. The 566 beats them :-) It also beats my KWM-2 (on reception that is -- Collins transmit audio is still Collins; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00574.html (12,811 bytes)
156. Re: [TenTec] OII V2.044A (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:52:43 -0500 (EST); Jerry, Lee, and others, It may be useful to draw a distinction between digging weak signals out of the noise and improving the SNR on stronger signals so they sound better. As we know, most of the in; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00581.html (10,394 bytes)
157. Re: [TenTec] OII V2.044A (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 18:44:08 -0500 (EST); Jerry, Sounds reasonable to me. I have no data on the effect of fatigue. I do know that in the good old days (1980s-1990s), when men were men and EME was on CW, some of the best EME operators, like V; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00590.html (14,129 bytes)
158. Re: [TenTec] O II v2.044A (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:35:20 -0500 (EST); Jerry, Yes, operators do vary. Here's a paper I wrote on the subject in 2002. 73 Ray W2RS _Click here: N1BUG Web: The Weak-Signal Capability of the Human Ear_ (http://www.g1ogy.com/www.n1bug.net/tech; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00602.html (6,942 bytes)
159. [TenTec] Link (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2011 06:40:45 -0500 (EST); If the link in my previous email didn't work, here it is again: _N1BUG Web: The Weak-Signal Capability of the Human Ear_ (http://www.g1ogy.com/www.n1bug.net/tech/w2rs/humanear.html) 73 Ray __________; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00603.html (6,663 bytes)
160. [TenTec] Test, please disregard (score: 1): Author: Rsoifer@aol.com; Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 09:29:03 -0500 (EST); _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec; /archives//html/TenTec/2011-02/msg00608.html (6,266 bytes)

Current List: 141 - 160
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16]