Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Rick@dj0ip.de: 3273 ]

Total 3273 documents matching your query.

341. RE: [TenTec]dreaming about a 100 w. mobile rig (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:59:50 -0700
Make it a full 100w. 50w won't drive many of the current linears to full power. In fact many need about 120w. (I'm referring to linears for home, not for mobile). The mobile linear can be 400 to 500w
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00131.html (9,897 bytes)

342. RE: [TenTec] Orion QSK (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:45:36 -0700
Lee, I think the a rig needs to meet a couple of basic requirements at any and all speeds that man is capable of working at: 1. It should not cause key clicks! 2. It should not shorten the first dit
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00160.html (9,618 bytes)

343. RE: [TenTec] Missing 565 Manual? (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 14:26:17 -0700
Hi Ed, Here's the file you are looking for. I found it just now under the link Scott sent us. I have saved it in a form that can be viewed with your browser. You should get the attachment. The others
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00174.html (8,791 bytes)

344. RE: [TenTec] 500 HZ Roofing Filter Attenuation-Orion (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:32:05 -0700
Toby, have you adjusted the center frequency offset for the 500 Hz filter. If not, that might be the reason you have too much attenuation. Then again the filter might be defective. There should be no
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00182.html (8,641 bytes)

345. RE: [TenTec]dreaming about a 100 w. mobile rig (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:32:53 -0700
If you are serious about mobile operations, buy a car with a diesel engine. You won't have any problem with ignition noise. 73 Rick My mobile HF operation (40m) is more limited by power line noise ru
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00183.html (8,316 bytes)

346. RE: [TenTec] Re: Orion qsk (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 19:37:36 -0700
Bob (or others), do the traffic nets (NTS) in CW still exist? I thought PR would have eliminated them. I used to be quite active in the 60's - also NCS for local and reginal nets. Callsign back then
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00185.html (8,644 bytes)

347. RE: [TenTec]dreaming about a 100 w. mobile rig (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 20:29:16 -0700
I said buy a car, not a ... ;-) I haven't any noise problems with my Mercedes diesel. Just ask Scott. He ran several QSOs from the passenger seat on our way to Friedrichshafen. 73 Rick Unless they re
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00191.html (10,568 bytes)

348. RE: [TenTec] Re: Orion qsk (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 20:30:31 -0700
Tnx Tony, Yes, that's the one thing I missed most about moving to Europe. We can go to other countries, some of them even desirable ones (HB0, 3A, etc.), but we don't have anything like NTS over here
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00192.html (8,734 bytes)

349. RE: [TenTec]dreaming about a 100 w. mobile rig (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 20:34:20 -0700
OK guys, you have won the sale. So many of you disputed my point that it must be wrong - at least for the states. I concede. I guess I should say, "buy a German diesel". Unfortunately Germany does no
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00193.html (8,392 bytes)

350. RE: [TenTec] QRP (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 13:20:33 -0700
No Barry, that's OK what he is doing. You are allowed to advertise your planned operations in advance - you just are not allowed to do it during the contest. Announcement: during WAEDC CW contest, li
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00326.html (7,857 bytes)

351. RE: [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:43:20 -0700
"Chops of the first dit by 30%" - lovely! Still, he did like the rig, overall! Some TT readers might be interested in RSGB review of IC-7800. G3SJX noted second oscilator noise being higher then IC-7
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00354.html (7,364 bytes)

352. RE: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:11:36 -0700
Hi Bill, Wonder what you work 5w with from your camper? I am just about to receive an Argonaut 515 which has been refurbished at the factory. It will arrive either today or tomorrow in Hamburg (at th
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00371.html (10,855 bytes)

353. RE: [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:15:14 -0700
Hi Sinisa! "Systematically" and by the way, I have NOT noticed the Orion doing that. I've tested it quite a bit using a second receiver and up to about 60 or 70 wpm it was OK. Beyond that I honestly
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00372.html (7,987 bytes)

354. RE: [TenTec] Orion Roofing Filter Cut In (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 21:17:14 -0700
SRI for the SPAM, the previous email was meant for Bill. Sure wish someone would turn this "broadcast feature" off! 73 Rick Hi Bill, Wonder what you work 5w with from your camper? I am just about to
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00373.html (11,350 bytes)

355. RE: [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:49:30 -0700
In QSK mode, EVERY dit and dah is the first dit! So in that case, you read it right. And it chops 30% at just 40 wpm. Also, there is no provision for keying a QSK linear (at any speed). 73 Rick I rea
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00391.html (8,902 bytes)

356. RE: [TenTec] dit chopper IC-7800 (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:26:41 -0700
I dissagree. I think Icom just does't care about high-speed break-in. If it did, then it would at least attempt to incorporate a QSK keying circuit for QSK linears. They didn't even address the issue
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00396.html (12,722 bytes)

357. RE: [TenTec] G3SJX IC-7800 review (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:47:00 -0700
Bob, Well, to the letter, I must admit that I am not personally sure. However here's my source of info on that data point: RadCom, August 2004 edition, page 18, written by Peter Hart, G3SXJ: "There i
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00401.html (9,537 bytes)

358. RE: [TenTec] IC7800 Review: Why is this getting covered here? (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:53:23 -0700
Seems pretty clear to me Rob. People with an Orion like to understand how it stacks up against other high-end rigs. The 7800 review in RadCom came out just a few days ago so it's currently a hot topp
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00403.html (8,259 bytes)

359. RE: [TenTec] dit chopper IC-7800 (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 14:56:55 -0700
Well we can continue on Icom and CW. On my IC-706 mobile rig, the front panel is detachable and everything can be connected and controlled from the remote front panel - except the paddle. It has to p
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00404.html (7,659 bytes)

360. RE: [TenTec] dit chopper IC-7800 (score: 1)
Author: "NJ0IP" <Rick@dj0ip.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 21:22:36 -0700
Tom, I'm sure he sounded excellent. He just wasn't running QSK. This brings us to the point: what do CW operators really want? Well, I suppose we won't even agree amongst ourselves so how can we expe
/archives//html/TenTec/2004-08/msg00446.html (16,177 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu